Name your most hated players in the league

[Wedgie]

The competition started 19 games ago?
Convenient!

Not as convenient as remembering just 1 game

I'm very old, I remember 13 premierships and being champions of Australia, not just 1 game or 19!

[doggies4eva]

The competition started 19 games ago?
Convenient!

Not as convenient as remembering just 1 game

I'm very old, I remember 13 premierships and being champions of Australia, not just 1 game or 19!

You must be VERY old. North won their first premiership in 1900!. With a memory like that you must remember their 1989 GF. Was that the one where they went out "with one goal in mind"?

[Wedgie]

You must be VERY old. North won their first premiership in 1900!. With a memory like that you must remember their 1989 GF. Was that the one where they went out "with one goal in mind"?

I do remember 1905 when we kept Port to 1 goal in a GF, at least it took ut 84 years longer to copy and even then, they scored less than us!

[doggies4eva]

I do remember 1905 when we kept Port to 1 goal in a GF, at least it took ut 84 years longer to copy and even then, they scored less than us!

Now that's what I call selective memory. Are you seriously saying that the standard of the comp was the same in 1905 as 1989? Low scores were fairly common 100 years ago.

[Wedgie]

Now that's what I call selective memory. Are you seriously saying that the standard of the comp was the same in 1905 as 1989? Low scores were fairly common 100 years ago.

Standard was much better in those days as less team, you'll have to trust my memory too.

I blame others for getting off topic at times but looking at the original topic and what I'm crapping on about now I can safely blame myself as much as anyone else!

[doggies4eva]

Now that's what I call selective memory. Are you seriously saying that the standard of the comp was the same in 1905 as 1989? Low scores were fairly common 100 years ago.

Standard was much better in those days as less team, you'll have to trust my memory too.

I blame others for getting off topic at times but looking at the original topic and what I'm crapping on about now I can safely blame myself as much as anyone else!

Perhaps our abaove debate should be transferred into a new thread called "Why North are Crap"?

[Wedgie]

Perhaps our abaove debate should be transferred into a new thread called "Why North are Crap"?

lmao!

[doggies4eva]

Perhaps our abaove debate should be transferred into a new thread called "Why North are Crap"?

lmao!

And to think that i just put a good word in for you after you were unfairly accused on the CDFC site

[drebin]

Now that's what I call selective memory. Are you seriously saying that the standard of the comp was the same in 1905 as 1989? Low scores were fairly common 100 years ago.

Standard was much better in those days as less team, you'll have to trust my memory too.

I blame others for getting off topic at times but looking at the original topic and what I'm crapping on about now I can safely blame myself as much as anyone else!

Perhaps our abaove debate should be transferred into a new thread called "Why North are Crap"?

Doesn't that get included in just about every thread in any case

[doggies4eva]

[drebin]

Now that's what I call selective memory. Are you seriously saying that the standard of the comp was the same in 1905 as 1989? Low scores were fairly common 100 years ago.

Standard was much better in those days as less team, you'll have to trust my memory too.

I blame others for getting off topic at times but looking at the original topic and what I'm crapping on about now I can safely blame myself as much as anyone else!

Perhaps our abaove debate should be transferred into a new thread called "Why North are Crap"?

Doesn't that get included in just about every thread in any case

You mean the "North's won it this year- just look at our team on paper" Thread?

No, sorry missed that one? Can you show me the link! Must be under the same section as this thread "Dogs Supporters suprised, "There was a SANFL prior to 2000? thread"

[doggies4eva]

Now that's what I call selective memory. Are you seriously saying that the standard of the comp was the same in 1905 as 1989? Low scores were fairly common 100 years ago.

Standard was much better in those days as less team, you'll have to trust my memory too.

I blame others for getting off topic at times but looking at the original topic and what I'm crapping on about now I can safely blame myself as much as anyone else!

Perhaps our abaove debate should be transferred into a new thread called "Why North are Crap"?

Doesn't that get included in just about every thread in any case

You mean the "North's won it this year- just look at our team on paper" Thread?

No, sorry missed that one? Can you show me the link! Must be under the same section as this thread "Dogs Supporters suprised, "There was a SANFL prior to 2000? thread"

Look under "Dark Ages"

[drebin]

Look under "Dark Ages"

Isn't that the continuing thread about South Adelaide FC?

[GWW]

You must be VERY old. North won their first premiership in 1900!. With a memory like that you must remember their 1989 GF. Was that the one where they went out "with one goal in mind"?

I do remember 1905 when we kept Port to 1 goal in a GF, at least it took ut 84 years longer to copy and even then, they scored less than us!

Its amazing how North supporter's bring up this 1905 game when the 89 grand final is brought up, i wouldnt have thought there was much comparison - the 1989 game would be in most of our lifetimes...the 1905 game would have been before most of our grandparents were alive......in 1905 the average scores would no doubt have been a lot lower than they were in 89.

[Punk Rooster]

Its amazing how North supporter's bring up this 1905 game when the 89 grand final is brought up, i wouldnt have thought there was much comparison - the 1989 game would be in most of our lifetimes...the 1905 game would have been before most of our grandparents were alive......in 1905 the average scores would no doubt have been a lot lower than they were in 89.

1989 is ancient history, get over it!

[Wedgie]

The only difference between the 2 GFs were that Port kicked less in 1905 than Port kicked in 1989.
They're both in the record books.
Try telling my kids that 1989 was important! lol

Port will have to keep us to a lower score in a GF than 1905 before they have bragging rights, they haven't for the last 101 years and they won't ever!

[GWW]

Its amazing how North supporter's bring up this 1905 game when the 89 grand final is brought up, i wouldnt have thought there was much comparison - the 1989 game would be in most of our lifetimes...the 1905 game would have been before most of our grandparents were alive......in 1905 the average scores would no doubt have been a lot lower than they were in 89.

1989 is ancient history, get over it!

I was responding to a North supporter who was discussing it.

[drebin]

Its amazing how North supporter's bring up this 1905 game when the 89 grand final is brought up, i wouldnt have thought there was much comparison - the 1989 game would be in most of our lifetimes...the 1905 game would have been before most of our grandparents were alive......in 1905 the average scores would no doubt have been a lot lower than they were in 89.

1989 is ancient history, get over it!

I was responding to a North supporter who was discussing it.

Punky is only 13 years of age so anything before 1993 is ancient!

[Punk Rooster]

Punky is only 13 years of age so anything before 1993 is ancient!

As opposed to Drebin, who is 108!

[drebin]

Punky is only 13 years of age so anything before 1993 is ancient!

As opposed to Drebin, who is 108!

Still waiting for my telegram from the Queen