Salad wrote:Arry Gablett wrote:am Bays wrote:wedgetail wrote:All because port were petty, sore loser a---holes and wouldn't lend WT a new ball for port's second innings on the first day. Would suggest port will get short shrift from WT if asking any favours from them in the future! There have been numerous instances in the past where clubs have lent a new ball to the opposition when needed and then the club would give them a replacement ASAP.
Mate, that's like whinging over being stumped before over is called!!
How hard is it at any Grade of premier cricket to not have at least two new rocks.
Port well within their rights IMO not to give up a new Kooka Regulation to the oppo and I hate all things Port Adelaide
Fair dinkum!
I agree with this its not community cricket
Players and coaches involved in premier cricket are theoretically 2 performances away from the test team
so if i read this right and am happy to be corrected
WT forgot to pack a second ball - poor preparation
PORT wouldnt lend them one - many players looking to play at higher level, money invested into their wins, within their rights as its not their responsibility to help a rival club
WT coach threw the toys out of the cot again because he didnt get his way- may be a great bloke and coach but has a history of petulant behaviour when things dont go his way - and clearly has affected his chances to go higher
WT suporters blaming others for the organisation they support making a mistake that would not suggest high performance
What’s the theoretical performance you need to play to go from Grade cricket to Australia in 2 games do you think?
300no against a West Torrens/Kensington/Glenelg side then a 1st and 2nd innings double ton against a state side?
its theoretical champ you can make it what you want just back it up