RB wrote:Booney wrote:People are being instructed to do it?
Instructive - i.e. informative.
I can't help but notice that it's mainly grumpy old blokes like us that he's copping a roast from. I'm about as much of a cricket purist as it gets, but I can't help but think that the change in approach at the crease Konstas is bringing might pay dividends (arguably it already has). And gee he's copped a bit, seems pretty resilient as well though.

Got a spare ten
Exactly this ^^^^^^
A pair of 20’s is not setting the world alight but is also par for the course, if not just over given what both sides top 6 have produced. IF Australia get up an opening stance of 0/39 to start a small run chase is playing a role.
Yeah the second innings dismissal sounds like a bad look but it’s it lending into an almost identical scenario to Pant. You’re going to get the best out of Konstas when you take the good with the bad and accept it.
I think the best summary is that this test has shown equal measures of brilliance as well as lingering question marks and the answer to whether Konstas can make it as a test batsmen is no clearer.
What makes me laugh is most of us on here couldn’t remember or at least count on one hand the amount of teenage openers we have seen in our life time score a 50 and average 30 in a series. BUT because he has a bit of an attitude his the devils son.
The even funnier part is the chatter on here about McSwenney being the unluckiest bloke on the planet yet didn’t produce a third of what Konstas has. The SA bias in here is embarrassing given it’s a national team.