by stampy » Sun May 04, 2025 2:43 pm
by dedja » Sun May 04, 2025 5:09 pm
by locky801 » Sun May 04, 2025 5:19 pm
dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
by dedja » Sun May 04, 2025 5:31 pm
locky801 wrote:dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
Bays hit the front
by dedja » Sun May 04, 2025 5:37 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Sun May 04, 2025 7:19 pm
by mots02 » Mon May 05, 2025 10:26 am
dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
by dedja » Mon May 05, 2025 10:29 am
mots02 wrote:dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
Breeze dropped off in the 4th…. After working so hard for 2 qtrs into it and short on the bench Sturt did really well to steady in the last 5 minutes and grab the win after the bays hit the front
A good game, although a lot of turnovers and the umpires were too whistle happy all day, particularly pulling a lot of frees for holding in marking contests.
by mots02 » Mon May 05, 2025 10:50 am
dedja wrote:mots02 wrote:dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
Breeze dropped off in the 4th…. After working so hard for 2 qtrs into it and short on the bench Sturt did really well to steady in the last 5 minutes and grab the win after the bays hit the front
A good game, although a lot of turnovers and the umpires were too whistle happy all day, particularly pulling a lot of frees for holding in marking contests.
I thought the umps favoured the Bays![]()
Agree, the wind was less of a factor in the last. Even though they nearly did steal it, the Bays didn’t deserve to win so an appropriate result.
by Ronnie » Mon May 05, 2025 2:37 pm
by mots02 » Mon May 05, 2025 3:01 pm
Ronnie wrote:What a great advertisement that was for SANFL football. A great contest between 2 rivals played at a high level. Both sides have added some new elements to fairly settled sides. Was interesting to see Sturt keep a player on the field for the last quarter, Edmonds, who could hardly run, no doubt Mattner had his reasons but it does risk aggravating the injury.
Football
SANFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

