by DOC » Fri May 23, 2025 9:19 pm
by daysofourlives » Sat May 24, 2025 7:05 pm
stan wrote:This situation is crap, kane shouldn't be on the ground if there's thst much of an issue.MW wrote:Do we want the media deliberately getting under the skin of the coaches and players? Both were at fault here, Kane should not have engaged with Bevo on the field and Bevo should not have been death staring him walking so close.
Bevo needs a kick up the ass too, he engaged and made something out of nothing.
by Jimmy_041 » Sat May 24, 2025 10:26 pm
daysofourlives wrote:stan wrote:This situation is crap, kane shouldn't be on the ground if there's thst much of an issue.MW wrote:Do we want the media deliberately getting under the skin of the coaches and players? Both were at fault here, Kane should not have engaged with Bevo on the field and Bevo should not have been death staring him walking so close.
Bevo needs a kick up the ass too, he engaged and made something out of nothing.
Of course Kane is entitled to be on the ground, Bevo just needs to stop being a flog. They've won a couple games and Bevo is back to thinking he's the best coach of all time., Mind you theyre still only 6/5 anyone would think theyre unbeaten the way the rest of the media beat their meat of them.
These clubs that are boycotting Kane and anyone else for that matter might wana check how they're kept afloat. Bulldogs and North both rely heavily on the AFlL for funding and CH7 contribute alot to that through their rights deal. They would have every right to question the AFL over their clubs petulant behaviour towards their star employee
by Jimmy_041 » Sat May 24, 2025 10:26 pm
daysofourlives wrote:stan wrote:This situation is crap, kane shouldn't be on the ground if there's thst much of an issue.MW wrote:Do we want the media deliberately getting under the skin of the coaches and players? Both were at fault here, Kane should not have engaged with Bevo on the field and Bevo should not have been death staring him walking so close.
Bevo needs a kick up the ass too, he engaged and made something out of nothing.
Of course Kane is entitled to be on the ground, Bevo just needs to stop being a flog. They've won a couple games and Bevo is back to thinking he's the best coach of all time., Mind you theyre still only 6/5 anyone would think theyre unbeaten the way the rest of the media beat their meat of them.
These clubs that are boycotting Kane and anyone else for that matter might wana check how they're kept afloat. Bulldogs and North both rely heavily on the AFlL for funding and CH7 contribute alot to that through their rights deal. They would have every right to question the AFL over their clubs petulant behaviour towards their star employee
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 28, 2025 9:42 am
by Rik E Boy » Wed May 28, 2025 10:22 am
daysofourlives wrote:stan wrote:This situation is crap, kane shouldn't be on the ground if there's thst much of an issue.MW wrote:Do we want the media deliberately getting under the skin of the coaches and players? Both were at fault here, Kane should not have engaged with Bevo on the field and Bevo should not have been death staring him walking so close.
Bevo needs a kick up the ass too, he engaged and made something out of nothing.
Of course Kane is entitled to be on the ground, Bevo just needs to stop being a flog. They've won a couple games and Bevo is back to thinking he's the best coach of all time., Mind you theyre still only 6/5 anyone would think theyre unbeaten the way the rest of the media beat their meat of them.
These clubs that are boycotting Kane and anyone else for that matter might wana check how they're kept afloat. Bulldogs and North both rely heavily on the AFlL for funding and CH7 contribute alot to that through their rights deal. They would have every right to question the AFL over their clubs petulant behaviour towards their star employee
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:26 am
by Corona Man » Tue Jun 03, 2025 2:51 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jack riewoldt with a cornes style hot take. Doesn't suit his style, which he's probably still trying to figure out and certainly doesn't fit in with the style of On the Couch
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Jun 03, 2025 2:57 pm
Corona Man wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jack riewoldt with a cornes style hot take. Doesn't suit his style, which he's probably still trying to figure out and certainly doesn't fit in with the style of On the Couch
I find Jack a little hard to take. Not sure why, to be honest. His TV delivery style is not appealing to me. I liked him as a player, not so much as a presenter.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jun 03, 2025 2:58 pm
Corona Man wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jack riewoldt with a cornes style hot take. Doesn't suit his style, which he's probably still trying to figure out and certainly doesn't fit in with the style of On the Couch
I find Jack a little hard to take. Not sure why, to be honest.
by daysofourlives » Wed Jun 04, 2025 2:28 pm
Corona Man wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jack riewoldt with a cornes style hot take. Doesn't suit his style, which he's probably still trying to figure out and certainly doesn't fit in with the style of On the Couch
I find Jack a little hard to take. Not sure why, to be honest. His TV delivery style is not appealing to me. I liked him as a player, not so much as a presenter.
by wenchbarwer » Wed Jun 04, 2025 2:32 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |