by Mythical Creature » Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:02 am
by citycoaster17 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:25 am
hollywood7477 wrote:jo172 wrote:The way they both go down, and he walks away as if he's had the stuffing knocked out of him makes that one of the stranger things i've ever seen.
The spectators didn’t even know what happened. Yep it was a punch but not sure it was worth 16 games. I’ve seen worse get stuff all. The Portland captain a few years ago got 8 or something for more than that. Don’t condone violence on the footy field and he should never have hit, him just not sure it was worth 16.
by whufc » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:35 am
The Bedge wrote:4th Quarter (15 minutes in) 100:39
Brandon received 10 for striking and 4 for rough conduct (falling on the player after the hit). This has taken a few weeks to finalise for a couple of reasons - firstly was us trying to exhaust every avenue where this doesn't end up in a national dereg.. that became evident quickly was never going to be the case, so the second was negotiating to a degree an early plea to avoid Brandon having to front the tribunal to effectively be told he can never play again, and obviously the emotional impact that goes with that.
Brandon was on 11 games - 1 game meant no more AdFL that was obvious, and was never getting less than 4 games for striking, so really the number of games he received became academic.. our (my) concern is his future, keeping him involved in the club and remaining a mentor for younger lads, plus the potential to coach his son in the future.
Make no mistake, this incident has had a deep impact on Bran and his family.. he knows he ****** up, he hasn't shied away from that, and he's cut up not only about not playing, but the impact his actions have had on Rayner, his own family and the club.
As a club we will remain supportive to him - think what you like, but he's a quality bloke and he is a major reason we have been able to turn things around... end of the day he's a human with feelings who made a mistake and has to live with it.
We have made massive strides forward as a club in recent years, this incident doesn't define us, we will continue to press forward and drive standards / change from within.
by whufc » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:40 am
The Bedge wrote:4th Quarter (15 minutes in) 100:39
Brandon received 10 for striking and 4 for rough conduct (falling on the player after the hit). This has taken a few weeks to finalise for a couple of reasons - firstly was us trying to exhaust every avenue where this doesn't end up in a national dereg.. that became evident quickly was never going to be the case, so the second was negotiating to a degree an early plea to avoid Brandon having to front the tribunal to effectively be told he can never play again, and obviously the emotional impact that goes with that.
Brandon was on 11 games - 1 game meant no more AdFL that was obvious, and was never getting less than 4 games for striking, so really the number of games he received became academic.. our (my) concern is his future, keeping him involved in the club and remaining a mentor for younger lads, plus the potential to coach his son in the future.
Make no mistake, this incident has had a deep impact on Bran and his family.. he knows he ****** up, he hasn't shied away from that, and he's cut up not only about not playing, but the impact his actions have had on Rayner, his own family and the club.
As a club we will remain supportive to him - think what you like, but he's a quality bloke and he is a major reason we have been able to turn things around... end of the day he's a human with feelings who made a mistake and has to live with it.
We have made massive strides forward as a club in recent years, this incident doesn't define us, we will continue to press forward and drive standards / change from within.
by MW » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:54 am
by wenchbarwer » Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:03 am
MW wrote:Good riddance. This is the reason we lost so many players in the early 2000's because they got sick of getting their noses broken behind play to guys like this.
by ROUNDTHETRAPS » Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:48 am
by MW » Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:56 am
by Courtney Fish » Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:18 am
Dutchy wrote:Brodlach wrote:Are you allowed to be involved in a club if you are deregistered by the league?
Was thinking the same thing, could he coach or does the deregistration just cover playing?
If there is genuine remorse then I think it is great that the club is supporting him, many wouldn't.
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:43 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by MW » Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:50 am
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:54 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by LaughingKookaburra » Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:55 am
MW wrote:If he has personal battles that make him susceptible to assaulting people on the football field, then it is negligent from the club to allow him to play knowing this.
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:03 am
MW wrote:If he has personal battles that make him susceptible to assaulting people on the football field, then it is negligent from the club to allow him to play knowing this.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by MW » Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:05 am
by BenchedEagle » Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:32 am
by hollywood7477 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:53 am
by whufc » Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:41 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:See Dan Gorringe has put it up on his socials. Saw it just then on Facebook.
by morell » Fri Jul 11, 2025 6:43 pm
by woodublieve12 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:18 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |