by stampy » Sat Sep 20, 2025 6:18 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sat Sep 20, 2025 6:39 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat Sep 20, 2025 7:52 pm
stampy wrote:that last free to porties was a ******* joke
by UpThere » Sat Sep 20, 2025 9:43 pm
by Mdj66 » Sat Sep 20, 2025 10:33 pm
by footy1992 » Sat Sep 20, 2025 10:38 pm
stampy wrote:that last free to porties was a ******* joke
by Divers » Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:47 pm
by tigerpie » Sun Sep 21, 2025 1:05 pm
UpThere wrote:SFL umpiring has to be up there with worst in the state im sure of it
by Tiger83 » Sun Sep 21, 2025 2:31 pm
by wenchbarwer » Mon Sep 22, 2025 9:18 am
Tiger83 wrote:So does Jarman keep his job or is there truth in an unhappy playing group that want him gone? I wouldn’t have thought the club will make a change now? Premierships paper over cracks. Other clubs have a lot of Points room though so Porties may fade into irrelevance for another 28 years?
by Dutchy » Mon Sep 22, 2025 4:20 pm
footy1992 wrote:stampy wrote:that last free to porties was a ******* joke
I'll draw your attention to the CSLFUP interpretation of laws for SFL & GSFL
DELIBERATE RUSHED BEHIND
A deliberate rushed behind will only be paid if the defending Ruckman hits the ball over the goal line on the full. A behind is NOT recorded and a free kick taken from where the ball crossed the line (On an angle between the points and straight in front in the goal square).
NO other rushed behind will be penalised in our leagues.
Another case of players (and the abysmal commentary team) not knowing the rules. Its been in there since 2017....
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |