PAFC 2025

[Booney]

AGM coming up so there will be a member elect vote I'd imagine.

In essence he was voted onto the board by the members on a Hinkley out platform ( untenable ) and as it turns out his position became untenable but his work was done.

[wenchbarwer]

Would Bruce Abernathy put his hand up again? Seems far less of a nutjob

[Brodlach]

Another election , go one short or straight out appointment?

Another court case? If he can afford it?

[dedja]

Tredders booted out

Didn’t see that coming

[Bum Crack]

Tredders booted out

Didn’t see that coming

I can't believe it took this long.

[wenchbarwer]

Another election , go one short or straight out appointment?

Another court case? If he can afford it?

Need gold and silver coin for that, there is none, remember?

[dedja]

Tredders booted out

Didn’t see that coming

I can't believe it took this long.

I’m not surprised.

Due to the SovCit’s beliefs and litigious nature, the club would have had to make sure that they crossed and dotted every single possible scenario to cover all bases to mitigate him urguing his case any further.

[mighty_tiger_79]

Not over yet....

[Dutchy]

Removed due to what someone else said? I don't like the guy but think he has been poorly treated here.

[DOC]

Ben Rutten replaces Chris Davies.

[dedja]

Removed due to what someone else said? I don't like the guy but think he has been poorly treated here.

C’mon, you can’t be serious?

“Amongst other things, the board formally requested that Mr Tredrea agree to a Club Statement which included an apology to the club and anyone who took offence to the comments made on his podcast by Mr AJ Roberts,” the Power said.

“Mr Tredrea refused to agree with the public apology request to close out the matter.

“The board has afforded Mr Tredrea numerous opportunities to reconsider his position, which he has not changed.

“After exhausting all reasonable avenues for resolution, the board determined that Mr Tredrea’s continuation as a director was not in the best interests of the club.”

That’s fairly standard practice that if a guest of any media outlet spews radical views that could upset a section of the community or is out of step with community norms (attacking the actions of Jews during WWII is right up there) then that media outlet will apologies for those statements and clearly state that the views are of the guest and not of them. It doesn’t prohibit free speech, doesn’t stop him from having a podcast, but ensures that a representative of the club behaves in a way that isn’t a detriment to the club.

By not making such a statement, Tredrea is effectively condoning what was said by his guest.

Tredrea is a 1st class moron who can do whatever he likes as SovCit, but when he’s not solely representing himself, as was the case as a Board member, then he has to adhere to some standards.

[Booney]

Removed due to what someone else said? I don't like the guy but think he has been poorly treated here.

No, removed for not condemning it.