by RB » Wed Dec 03, 2025 12:56 pm
by locky801 » Wed Dec 03, 2025 12:59 pm
RB wrote:Webster is very, very unlucky not to get picked ahead of Inglis.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:08 pm
RB wrote:Webster is very, very unlucky not to get picked ahead of Inglis.
by am Bays » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:23 pm
by RB » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:30 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:36 pm
am Bays wrote:LM made me check the respective stats
Inglis 4 tests 119 runs 1x ton ave 30. 1st class 3246 runs at 36
Webster 7 tests 381 runs 4 x 50 ave 35. 1st class 6253 runs at 37
So yeah Webster is getting the rough end of the Pandanas leaves (noting his time playing at Darwin CC as the interstate recruit)
I'm with LM now!
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:37 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:am Bays wrote:LM made me check the respective stats
Inglis 4 tests 119 runs 1x ton ave 30. 1st class 3246 runs at 36
Webster 7 tests 381 runs 4 x 50 ave 35. 1st class 6253 runs at 37
So yeah Webster is getting the rough end of the Pandanas leaves (noting his time playing at Darwin CC as the interstate recruit)
I'm with LM now!
Russell scoed 102 of his test runs in one innings when we would've scored 1000 if we kept batting, and we were playing against an under 11 team.
The extra bowling option and the fact he has showed up when others haven't gives him the nod for me.
by whufc » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:44 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:am Bays wrote:LM made me check the respective stats
Inglis 4 tests 119 runs 1x ton ave 30. 1st class 3246 runs at 36
Webster 7 tests 381 runs 4 x 50 ave 35. 1st class 6253 runs at 37
So yeah Webster is getting the rough end of the Pandanas leaves (noting his time playing at Darwin CC as the interstate recruit)
I'm with LM now!
Russell scoed 102 of his test runs in one innings when we would've scored 1000 if we kept batting, and we were playing against an under 11 team.
The extra bowling option and the fact he has showed up when others haven't gives him the nod for me.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:51 pm
whufc wrote:
Yep agree. If there is runs were actually weighted Webster has definitely made the 'tougher' runs.
Also means we can cover 5 slips with just Green and Webster.
by whufc » Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:53 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:
Yep agree. If there is runs were actually weighted Webster has definitely made the 'tougher' runs.
Also means we can cover 5 slips with just Green and Webster.
Have you seen footage of Webster playing footy back in the day?
Other Sports
Cricket
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

