by mal » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:44 pm
by smac » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:47 pm
rod_rooster wrote:smac wrote:Scores gentlemen?
9/391 at lunch
by NFC » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:48 pm
smac wrote:rod_rooster wrote:smac wrote:Scores gentlemen?
9/391 at lunch
Thanks, sorry to interrupt.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:49 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:49 pm
NFC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:NFC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:How so? We need someone who is a very ordinary bowler even when fit? Perhaps we need more players breaking down? Makes perfect sense
FC bowling average of 30. ODI bowling average of 31.
Yep, dreadful figures.
Ah yes, stats tell the whole story. That's right, silly me
Ah yes, 103 wickets must all be flukes and tailenders.
by NFC » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:52 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Where did i say that?
Bowling to international batting lineups is a fair bit different than bowling to the Redbacks for example.
You might want to re-check that ODI bowling average as well.
by Dirko » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:53 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:54 pm
NFC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Where did i say that?
Bowling to international batting lineups is a fair bit different than bowling to the Redbacks for example.
You might want to re-check that ODI bowling average as well.
34 with the ball. Not bad at all.
Especially to go with a batting average of 34.
by NFC » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:55 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:NFC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Where did i say that?
Bowling to international batting lineups is a fair bit different than bowling to the Redbacks for example.
You might want to re-check that ODI bowling average as well.
34 with the ball. Not bad at all.
Especially to go with a batting average of 34.
Good averages for Englishmen but pretty underwhelming given that he is aspiring to don the green and gold. Sorry NFC but those figures aren't that special. I've yet to be convinced by your mate Watto.
regards,
REB
by mal » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:59 pm
smac wrote:Scores gentlemen?
by mal » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:00 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:07 pm
mal wrote:14 in a row and Stuart Clark played in all of them
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:07 pm
by NFC » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:10 pm
rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:14 in a row and Stuart Clark played in all of them
How many did Watson play in?
by mal » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:13 pm
rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:14 in a row and Stuart Clark played in all of them
How many did Watson play in?
by Rik E Boy » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:14 pm
mal wrote:rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:14 in a row and Stuart Clark played in all of them
How many did Watson play in?
How many did Luke Pomersbach and Shaun Marsh and Victor Trumper and Julius Ceaser play in ?
by Pup » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:15 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:
Different story Mal.
Pratt, great name that, was sub-fielding while fast bowlers were resting, not injured.
Symonds was not resting, but injured, hence Lockyear fielding throughout the match.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:16 pm
mal wrote: How many did Luke Pomersbach and Shaun Marsh and Victor Trumper and Julius Ceaser play in ?
by Pup » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:17 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:
Different story Mal.
Pratt, great name that, was sub-fielding while fast bowlers were resting, not injured.
Symonds was not resting, but injured, hence Lockyear fielding throughout the match.
by mal » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |