The irony is that following recent leadership elections ,the liberal party voted Mr Brendan Nelson to lead the party. Mr Nelson is not only a former Union leader but also a former member of the labor party................

by blueandwhite » Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:50 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:05 pm
blueandwhite wrote:During the election campaign the liberals went to great pains to inform the electorate of the great danger Australia faced if labor was elected and that their cabinet and ministry would contain 70% former trade unionists.
The irony is that following recent leadership elections ,the liberal party voted Mr Brendan Nelson to lead the party. Mr Nelson is not only a former Union leader but also a former member of the labor party................
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by McAlmanac » Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:20 pm
by Psyber » Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:27 pm
McAlmanac wrote:"You can't trust union leaders" was the thrust of the Liberal campaign. The claim of irony is highly appropriate.
by McAlmanac » Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:08 am
by Psyber » Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:35 am
McAlmanac wrote:At the end of the day, "you can't trust union leaders" was followed by the Liberals electing one from the past as their leader. A simple fact which is simply ironic. Nothing sinister - just amusing.
In any case, he looks like the short term fall guy for Turnbull or Costello to come along after the next election.
by redden whites » Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:49 am
by redandblack » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:22 am
by Psyber » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:41 pm
redandblack wrote:Psyber, I am a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
Of course it's a union.
by Hondo » Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:24 pm
redandblack wrote:Psyber, I am a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
Of course it's a union.
by oldfella » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:32 pm
by Andy #24 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:58 am
by Andy #24 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:05 am
Psyber wrote: The only one I resented was compulsory membership of the students' union at Adelaide Uni because I didn't need or use what they offered and objected to providing a training pitch for future politicians..
by BIG SEXY » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:13 am
by Andy #24 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:37 am
by heater31 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:48 am
Andy #24 wrote:Psyber wrote: The only one I resented was compulsory membership of the students' union at Adelaide Uni because I didn't need or use what they offered and objected to providing a training pitch for future politicians..
I reckon you would have struggled to go through Uni without using some union service. The services, clubs and events that the Union funded gave the place culture and a sense of community. Now the place is like an "education" vending machine, pump in the money, take out a degree.
by stan » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:20 pm
heater31 wrote:Andy #24 wrote:Psyber wrote: The only one I resented was compulsory membership of the students' union at Adelaide Uni because I didn't need or use what they offered and objected to providing a training pitch for future politicians..
I reckon you would have struggled to go through Uni without using some union service. The services, clubs and events that the Union funded gave the place culture and a sense of community. Now the place is like an "education" vending machine, pump in the money, take out a degree.
Well I too like psyber resented the compulsory union membership. I collected the free stuff in my first year as my O week booklet said to. Forgot to do it the 2nd year and third the voluntary rules kicked in. Never used any other service other than the canteen facilities which had a small price rise since this all happened. Still get my newspapers at half price as like before the VSU
However I still pay my coin for my degree's student club even though I get farg all out of it.
by Andy #24 » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:48 pm
by stan » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:46 pm
Andy #24 wrote:Not a pollie mate I hate them, almost clobbered a few that got in my way. The Union does run the unibar, I think it was set up when John Bannon was the union pres. The Union runs unibooks and mayo too. They operate as stand alone businesses and student fees don't go into them but they are still run by the union.
Would it be different if the University charged a student services fee and provided the services themselves? I think the term union and the fact that people were compelled to join an organisation seperate to uni was what people objected too.
by GWW » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:48 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |