by Rooster_cracker » Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:59 pm
by Rooster_cracker » Sat Apr 15, 2006 6:24 pm
by Interceptor » Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:04 pm
by Peter Falconia » Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:46 pm
Interceptor wrote::evil:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
6 goals up and lost against the f'n eagles again
really shits me
sounds like incompetant umpiring really cost us in the end as well (according to 5rph)
by rsemmler » Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:59 pm
by spell_check » Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:14 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:15 pm
Interceptor wrote::evil:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
6 goals up and lost against the f'n eagles again
really shits me
sounds like incompetant umpiring really cost us in the end as well (according to 5rph)
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:19 pm
spell_check wrote:Don't ask me how the Eagles won, Norwood should have easily. Norwood comprehensively beat the Eagles in three quarters particularly the first and last. We were very, very lucky to come away with a win, it's so frustrating to see another poor start.
by Dissident » Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:36 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:44 pm
Dissident wrote:I stood in front of the scoreboard the whole game - and what do I see right at the start? Passador go to the back pocket. It's nt like he CAN'T play well there but hell, look what happened i nthe second when he stayed at that end and was up forward - took some great contested marks.
Umpiring wasn't great most of the day, both ways. At the end there seemed to be about 5 BALL chants from the Legs fans behind me in the space of 15 seconds. One or two might have been there but not all!
If someone kicks you the ball really low and you go to ground to attempt to mark it and someone gets on top of you right away, that ain't holding the ball.
The Legs forward line looked more damaging than ours, with some 202 ruckman forward (De Longhi heater?) kicked three goals on the run, one with a checkside no less!
by Interceptor » Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:11 pm
Peter Falconia wrote:Interceptor wrote::evil:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
6 goals up and lost against the f'n eagles again
really shits me
sounds like incompetant umpiring really cost us in the end as well (according to 5rph)
Did 5rph mention how many times Norwood had an opportunity to win the game in the last? Norwood only have themselves to blame.
by Interceptor » Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:20 pm
rsemmler wrote:The umpiring wasn't great, but it definitely didn't lose us the game. We conceded 8 goals in the second quarter, that lost us the game. Full credit to the Eagles, Norwood had better fitness, which showed with about 14 inside 50's to 5 in the last quarter but just couldn't convert.
by sturt1 » Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:34 pm
by MightyEagles » Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:38 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:24 pm
MightyEagles wrote:Agreed, you don't lead by 6 or 7 goals at qtr time and lose by a couple of pts. I remember a couple years back when we played at Norwood 5 goals down at Qtr time and won by 10 points.
by Pseudo » Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:24 pm
rsemmler wrote:Very disappointing crowd of just over 4000. Maybe we'll see some Glenelg supporters come out of the woodwork after their massive win.
by Tiger Couple » Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:56 pm
by RustyCage » Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:20 am
by spell_check » Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:21 am
pafc1870 wrote:They said on ABC News tonight that the Eags will be investigated by the SANFL for having McKenzie come back on to the ground near the end of the game. Surely the Eagles officials would know the rules.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |