by Dog_ger » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:55 pm
by bulldogproud » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:56 pm
by woodwt » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:58 pm
Dog_ger wrote:I don't think mitsubishi are to blame here.
They have done everything right here.
(a) Took over from Chrysler and employed all for more than a decade.
(b) Do you own a 360...?
If they can't sell the product, they realy can't stay in bussiness...?
Well Done Mitsubishi.....
Why didn't the State Government buy more fleet 360's.
It isn't rocket science....
by woodwt » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:08 pm
by Ian » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:10 pm
Dog_ger wrote:I heard a rumour a few years back.
The General was thinking about moving to China.......
by bazza1 » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:18 pm
by Squawk » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:26 pm
by Rucciangelo » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:28 pm
by TroyGFC » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:33 pm
woodwt wrote:Im surprised that no one lost it during todays meeting
by TroyGFC » Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:39 pm
Rucciangelo wrote:Why didn't they make a more appealing car?
We all know they needed an all wheel drive machine to interest the export market!
Just not fast and furious enough!
I feel for all those who are now out of work.
All the best people.
by the wonder elephant » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:25 pm
by TroyGFC » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:32 pm
by bulldogproud » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:36 pm
by the wonder elephant » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:40 pm
TroyGFC wrote:Don't quote me but I think Mitsubshi owns buildings and Chyrsler still own land- only rumour though
by JAS » Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:36 am
bulldogproud wrote:Yes, may I echo the above sentiments re those now out of work. Hoping something good turns up for you in the very near distant future.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:35 am
by mick » Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:19 am
by gadj1976 » Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:37 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:good luck to all looking for new employment
as mentioned above when the 380 or whatever was built the car industry was going small not big
surely they would have been better off trying to build a small car?????
by woodwt » Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:38 am
TroyGFC wrote:woodwt wrote:Im surprised that no one lost it during todays meeting
I think alot of people in a state of shock that the enviable actually happened. Do you work there woowt?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:58 am
gadj1976 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:good luck to all looking for new employment
as mentioned above when the 380 or whatever was built the car industry was going small not big
surely they would have been better off trying to build a small car?????
When I was at Mitsi, I realised that the plans for the latest Magna at the time were hatched 5 years previous, that's how long it takes to fully design, test and manufacture the new model.
That means that Mitsi needed to be looking well ahead into the market (like some other manufacturers did), but from my perspective, looked at the Commodore and Falcon staying "big" and trying to mix it in that market, rather than go off on a slight tangent and either go "green" or go "small". I think Mitsi as a company would've looked at the Lancer as their export saviour for the small market (as it's not manufactured here), and therefore left Mitsi Australia with no choice but to build a 6 cylinder car.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |