by McAlmanac » Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:53 am
by Dirko » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:46 am
by Dogwatcher » Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:47 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:33 pm
by smithy » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:59 pm
by Dirko » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:06 pm
smithy wrote:Are the Rams the worst EPL team ever ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/d/derby_county/4856682.stm
by McAlmanac » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:07 pm
smithy wrote:Are the Rams the worst EPL team ever ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/d/derby_county/4856682.stm
by smithy » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:58 pm
McAlmanac wrote:smithy wrote:Are the Rams the worst EPL team ever ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/d/derby_county/4856682.stm
Despite being a supporter for over 30 years - yes.
Interesting that a couple of candidates in that article won away at Liverpool during their horror campaigns.
by smithy » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:00 pm
SJABC wrote:smithy wrote:Are the Rams the worst EPL team ever ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/d/derby_county/4856682.stm
![]()
Nah they mention Sunderland twice in that article...
by johntheclaret » Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:43 am
smithy wrote:SJABC wrote:smithy wrote:Are the Rams the worst EPL team ever ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/d/derby_county/4856682.stm
![]()
Nah they mention Sunderland twice in that article...
SOrry SJABC - I was just quoting the articles headline, not stating an opinion.
It must be heartbreaking going from watching your team every week on the tv in the top league to struggling in DIV 1, which they reckon is harder to get back out of.
by johntheclaret » Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:50 am
by RoosterMarty » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:27 am
by Dirko » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:33 am
johntheclaret wrote:Fulhams disappointing draw at Derby has left them with a lot of work to do.
by Shoes » Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:45 pm
by Royal City » Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:11 pm
Shoes wrote:4-1! Its been a long time since the lads put in a performance like that. Id say the bottom three will stay how they are, although Id like Brum to take Fulhams place. I think fulham have a tough run home, 4 away matches or something?
by Dogwatcher » Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:21 pm
by Shoes » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:09 pm
Royal City wrote:Shoes wrote:4-1! Its been a long time since the lads put in a performance like that. Id say the bottom three will stay how they are, although Id like Brum to take Fulhams place. I think fulham have a tough run home, 4 away matches or something?
Oh dear, not another Mag![]()
![]()
Apparently Keegan is the messiah again based on two victories!!
by Dogwatcher » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:28 pm
by Royal City » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:33 pm
Shoes wrote:Royal City wrote:Shoes wrote:4-1! Its been a long time since the lads put in a performance like that. Id say the bottom three will stay how they are, although Id like Brum to take Fulhams place. I think fulham have a tough run home, 4 away matches or something?
Oh dear, not another Mag![]()
![]()
Apparently Keegan is the messiah again based on two victories!!
Haha, the messiah has returned. Two wins is all it takes to go from relegation threat to chasing a uefa cup spot![]()
by Dogwatcher » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:38 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |