trial game results

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Re: trial game results

Postby Pag » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:16 pm

Falcon Chick wrote:How did you blokes go?

SMOSH did us by about 6. They move the ball very well and very quickly, will be even more impressive with a few to come back in who didn't play yesterday. We had about 8-9 out of our best 21 as well, playing in the 2s or not playing at all, so we were also pretty happy with how we went.

Our Bs got up too which was really encouraging.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: trial game results

Postby wattle » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:38 pm

Ovingham defeated Nth Pines yesterday by over 20 goals
wattle
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby twogood4u » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:51 pm

Pag wrote:Kilburn over Virginia by about 4 goals in the end. Chicks were up by 6 at 1/4 time, game was over. Got out to about 10 then they took the foot off the pedal. The 4 goal margin wasn't indicative of the actual game. Virginia were not very good at all.
Waz at the game and i'll put a diffrent slant on this, Virginia did start slow(friday night cricket pres) but played some good hard footy after 1/4 time and run the game out better than kilburn. kilburn need to do alot of work to justify the money they are spending pag! nothing to impressive there .
twogood4u
Under 16s
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby footballfollower » Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:43 pm

twogood4u
i also will put a slant on it
kilburn 10 up then took players off and gave kids a go
also had 6 out first choice players
and to as you say justify the money....you wouldnt have a clue so why bring money up
footballfollower
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:06 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby TIRED TIGER » Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:47 pm

bit sensitive there football follower. taken over from andy?
TIRED TIGER
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: ADELAIDE
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 46 times
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Re: trial game results

Postby EB53 » Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:59 pm

T.T. did you find out the result of ROCS V BROADIES
EB53
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:55 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 7 times

Re: trial game results

Postby TIRED TIGER » Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:32 pm

rocs won by about 5 or 6 gls mate told me today. and no i dont know scoreline in case anybody asks
TIRED TIGER
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: ADELAIDE
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 46 times
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Re: trial game results

Postby twogood4u » Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:51 pm

TIRED TIGER wrote:bit sensitive there football follower. taken over from andy?
GOOD CALL T,T. by the way FF, u the only team resting players and trying a few thing in trials now!
:oops:
twogood4u
Under 16s
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby Rotter » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:34 pm

footballfollower wrote:twogood4u
i also will put a slant on it
kilburn 10 up then took players off and gave kids a go
also had 6 out first choice players
and to as you say justify the money....you wouldnt have a clue so why bring money up
I'm amazed a club would give someone another chance to come in, spend big and maybe even have a little success with scant regard for the trail of destruction he creates through trying to satisfy his own insecurities as a coach. On that he's not even a very good coach at that, just a con-man. Occa that is.
Further to that, what sort of club is in a position to "rest" first choice players in trial games after an 07 season of thrashings and subsequent relegation, what a load on crap.
Rotter
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby Pag » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:39 pm

twogood4u wrote:
Pag wrote:Kilburn over Virginia by about 4 goals in the end. Chicks were up by 6 at 1/4 time, game was over. Got out to about 10 then they took the foot off the pedal. The 4 goal margin wasn't indicative of the actual game. Virginia were not very good at all.
Waz at the game and i'll put a diffrent slant on this, Virginia did start slow(friday night cricket pres) but played some good hard footy after 1/4 time and run the game out better than kilburn. kilburn need to do alot of work to justify the money they are spending pag! nothing to impressive there .

Mate I watched the game as well, and I'm calling it how I saw it. I went out to the Kilburn huddle at 3/4 time and O'Connor brought about 5 kids on who looked about 17 years old each. Wilson moved out of the middle. Peter Dempsey racked up stats without looking like he got out of second gear. O'Loughlin provided a target for Virginia, and has a beautiful kick for goal on him, but is not fit. I didn't think Kilburn were the fittest side ever to be honest with you, and are not unbeatable in Div 3 this year. But if that was good footy for Virginia, I'd expect another long year. Kilburn didn't give a crap once the margin hit ten goals.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: trial game results

Postby Pag » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:43 pm

Rotter wrote:
footballfollower wrote:twogood4u
i also will put a slant on it
kilburn 10 up then took players off and gave kids a go
also had 6 out first choice players
and to as you say justify the money....you wouldnt have a clue so why bring money up
I'm amazed a club would give someone another chance to come in, spend big and maybe even have a little success with scant regard for the trail of destruction he creates through trying to satisfy his own insecurities as a coach. On that he's not even a very good coach at that, just a con-man. Occa that is.
Further to that, what sort of club is in a position to "rest" first choice players in trial games after an 07 season of thrashings and subsequent relegation, what a load on crap.

I'd never seen O'Connor before last night, only had heard what had been said through this place. But I listened to Greg Phillips at 1/4 time, and then O'Connor at 3/4 time, and there was no comparison whatsoever. O'Connor seemed to speak really well, seemed very thorough in his zones, set-ups etc. I know it's only one break in a trial game but he seemed like he knew what he was on about.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: trial game results

Postby Rotter » Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:55 pm

Pag wrote:
Rotter wrote:
footballfollower wrote:twogood4u
i also will put a slant on it
kilburn 10 up then took players off and gave kids a go
also had 6 out first choice players
and to as you say justify the money....you wouldnt have a clue so why bring money up
I'm amazed a club would give someone another chance to come in, spend big and maybe even have a little success with scant regard for the trail of destruction he creates through trying to satisfy his own insecurities as a coach. On that he's not even a very good coach at that, just a con-man. Occa that is.
Further to that, what sort of club is in a position to "rest" first choice players in trial games after an 07 season of thrashings and subsequent relegation, what a load on crap.

I'd never seen O'Connor before last night, only had heard what had been said through this place. But I listened to Greg Phillips at 1/4 time, and then O'Connor at 3/4 time, and there was no comparison whatsoever. O'Connor seemed to speak really well, seemed very thorough in his zones, set-ups etc. I know it's only one break in a trial game but he seemed like he knew what he was on about.
I should qualify my own observations having played in sides against his coaching and general chat from players in his teams that I've retained as friends over the years. He does sound good, hence my con-man jibe, he does have good set ups and structures but the reality is that's been plagiarized from others but mostly Tony Roach. However he has absolutely no understanding of what to do when he has to change his pre match plans when or if an opposition team threatens to compromise his plan A which no matter how well prepared you are that threat is intangible and tests a coach to think on his feet and he just doesn't have that.
Put simply, he is an excellent recruiting manager but coaching is not his forte
Rotter
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby Pag » Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:59 pm

Rotter wrote:
Pag wrote:
Rotter wrote:I'm amazed a club would give someone another chance to come in, spend big and maybe even have a little success with scant regard for the trail of destruction he creates through trying to satisfy his own insecurities as a coach. On that he's not even a very good coach at that, just a con-man. Occa that is.
Further to that, what sort of club is in a position to "rest" first choice players in trial games after an 07 season of thrashings and subsequent relegation, what a load on crap.

I'd never seen O'Connor before last night, only had heard what had been said through this place. But I listened to Greg Phillips at 1/4 time, and then O'Connor at 3/4 time, and there was no comparison whatsoever. O'Connor seemed to speak really well, seemed very thorough in his zones, set-ups etc. I know it's only one break in a trial game but he seemed like he knew what he was on about.
I should qualify my own observations having played in sides against his coaching and general chat from players in his teams that I've retained as friends over the years. He does sound good, hence my con-man jibe, he does have good set ups and structures but the reality is that's been plagiarized from others but mostly Tony Roach. However he has absolutely no understanding of what to do when he has to change his pre match plans when or if an opposition team threatens to compromise his plan A which no matter how well prepared you are that threat is intangible and tests a coach to think on his feet and he just doesn't have that.

Fair enough. Like I said, the three minutes I heard of him he sounded good, and Kilburn weren't exactly challenged or threatened so I can't comment on that part of it.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: trial game results

Postby footballfollower » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:12 pm

rotter welcome your comments
what i know is the facts, his coaching in barossa leauge
over 70% win ratio
last 2 years premiership coach
his coaching record previously at kilburn. made finals 4 years in a row in A1, that would = say around 60% +..........sounds like someone who can think on his feet to me
As the people at Kilburn have said their only way to get back to A1 is to get Occker back
Might i suggest we continue this discussion at the end of the year when the results will then decide.
footballfollower
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:06 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby twogood4u » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:55 pm

Rotter wrote:
footballfollower wrote:twogood4u
i also will put a slant on it
kilburn 10 up then took players off and gave kids a go
also had 6 out first choice players
and to as you say justify the money....you would have a clue so why bring money up
I'm amazed a club would give someone another chance to come in, spend big and maybe even have a little success with scant regard for the trail of destruction he creates through trying to satisfy his own insecurities as a coach. On that he's not even a very good coach at that, just a con-man. Occa that is.
Further to that, what sort of club is in a position to "rest" first choice players in trial games after an 07 season of thrashings and subsequent relegation, what a load on crap.
well put rotter, what is the point of trials? the huge influx of new players would demand they get as much match time as possible. making excuses at this time of the season! :oops: the game was good hit out for both Virginia and kilburn (A's )
twogood4u
Under 16s
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby twogood4u » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:59 pm

Pag wrote:
twogood4u wrote:
Pag wrote:Kilburn over Virginia by about 4 goals in the end. Chicks were up by 6 at 1/4 time, game was over. Got out to about 10 then they took the foot off the pedal. The 4 goal margin wasn't indicative of the actual game. Virginia were not very good at all.
Waz at the game and i'll put a diffrent slant on this, Virginia did start slow(friday night cricket pres) but played some good hard footy after 1/4 time and run the game out better than kilburn. kilburn need to do alot of work to justify the money they are spending pag! nothing to impressive there .

Mate I watched the game as well, and I'm calling it how I saw it. I went out to the Kilburn huddle at 3/4 time and O'Connor brought about 5 kids on who looked about 17 years old each. Wilson moved out of the middle. Peter Dempsey racked up stats without looking like he got out of second gear. O'Loughlin provided a target for Virginia, and has a beautiful kick for goal on him, but is not fit. I didn't think Kilburn were the fittest side ever to be honest with you, and are not unbeatable in Div 3 this year. But if that was good footy for Virginia, I'd expect another long year. Kilburn didn't give a crap once the margin hit ten goals.
out off touch pag, seen many cocky teams eat them words :wink:
twogood4u
Under 16s
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby twogood4u » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:00 pm

ever played for or against virginia pag?
twogood4u
Under 16s
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby Pag » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:04 pm

Mate I'm not associated with Kilburn or Virginia. Never played in the APFL against Virginia either. Only watched a couple of APFL games in my life but they both were a lot better than what Virginia showed last night.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: trial game results

Postby twogood4u » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:13 pm

Pag wrote:Mate I'm not associated with Kilburn or Virginia. Never played in the APFL against Virginia either. Only watched a couple of APFL games in my life but they both were a lot better than what Virginia showed last night.
TRIAL GAME! :oops: :wink: :lol:
twogood4u
Under 16s
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:15 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: trial game results

Postby Pag » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:17 pm

twogood4u wrote:
Pag wrote:Mate I'm not associated with Kilburn or Virginia. Never played in the APFL against Virginia either. Only watched a couple of APFL games in my life but they both were a lot better than what Virginia showed last night.
TRIAL GAME! :oops: :wink: :lol:

I understand that mate. How many did they have out then? Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Virginia at all, I'm just making the comparison since the APFL is of an A3 standard...
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |