
I feel 1.80 is a more appropriate figure.
Does anyone think Sturt are too short?
Same the $1.35 for the Magpies against a re-juvenated Panther outfit.
by sturtpeter » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:01 pm
by Punk Rooster » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:14 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by bulldogproud » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:19 pm
sturtpeter wrote:I don't like the $1.60 being offered by Thorntons for Sturt![]()
I feel 1.80 is a more appropriate figure.
Does anyone think Sturt are too short?Same the $1.35 for the Magpies against a re-juvenated Panther outfit.
by sturtpeter » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:32 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:33 pm
sturtpeter wrote:I don't like the $1.60 being offered by Thorntons for Sturt![]()
I feel 1.80 is a more appropriate figure.
Does anyone think Sturt are too short?
Same the $1.35 for the Magpies against a re-juvenated Panther outfit.
by sturtpeter » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:41 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:46 pm
sturtpeter wrote:I won't mate.
Never bet under the odds.
good luck to the Bays tomorrow at Brighton Rd.
by sturtpeter » Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:36 pm
by Ecky » Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:51 pm
sturtpeter wrote:Of the 4 sides we've played this Year, WWT, CD, Glen and Norwood, the Bays have impressed me the most.
Well coached and managed.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by ryles-kennels » Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:29 pm
sturtpeter wrote:Of the 4 sides we've played this Year, WWT, CD, Glen and Norwood, the Bays have impressed me the most.
Well coached and managed.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |