North vs Centrals this week

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby Blue Boy » Fri May 05, 2006 10:24 am

RM wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:Im tipping North.

They have a bloke named Gill runnin around out there who is just branin it.



My mail is that we will not have Gill Friday night due to injury.

Centrals must start favourites.
.

Well this does change it - if he doesnt play. Not changin my tip though.

This will be a good test then to see where both sides are at.
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Postby sydney-dog » Fri May 05, 2006 2:05 pm

the dogs are starting to get some structre back but may lack some match fitness, if Gill is out, this might make it interesting
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby am Bays » Fri May 05, 2006 2:30 pm

Doesn't matter who the forwards are if the midfield can get it in quick to a leading forward goals will be scored. Don't get me wrong North will miss Gill but not enough to even up the contest. FWIW NNorth will have a better conversion rate (goals:points) this game. :lol: :lol:

About two thirds of Norths goals last week were kicked by their midfield or resting midfielders in the forward line.

At the minute North have the best midfield in the comp, not having both Gowans for Centrals will relieve the pressure some what on the North midfield and allow them to deliver it more quickly to the forwards who ever they are.

That is why North will win this game.

IMHO the 2006 interpretations on the laws of football are taylor made for quick running midfield orientated teams. The effectiveness of scragging defenders/taggers has been diminshed somewhat by the new interpretations. This is the major reason for North and to a much lesser extent Glenelg's performance this year but it certainly has helped those teams.

I only wish these rules had come into effect when Paul Northeast was playing, he would have been umpired out of the game, thank christ.

Never underestimate the value of a good forward to provide you structure and a target, the bottom line is though, if the ball doesn't get down there via the midfield, well your forwrds are as useful as a pocket on a singlet.........
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19721
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby doggies4eva » Fri May 05, 2006 2:44 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:IMHO the 2006 interpretations on the laws of football are taylor made for quick running midfield orientated teams. The effectiveness of scragging defenders/taggers has been diminshed somewhat by the new interpretations. This is the major reason for North and to a much lesser extent Glenelg's performance this year but it certainly has helped those teams.

I only wish these rules had come into effect when Paul Northeast was playing, he would have been umpired out of the game, thank christ.


I only wish these rules had come in in the 70s and 80s when we had fast skillful sides that got scragged in the finals. I believe that the interpretations that are being so strictly applied early in the season will be gradually relaxed and by finals time we will be back to the usual where the umps put the whistle away for anything except the most blatent infringements.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby RoosterMarty » Fri May 05, 2006 2:59 pm

Yeah Tassie I agree with what you say to some extent (without saying North WILL win!)

If our midfield gets more of the ball then we won't need Gill, he's a huge loss because he's the best forward in the league at the moment, but Daethgod is still up there, Lads kicks goals, Unit too, and Tubby, Banger and friends can run forward and score too. We might not take as many marks in the forward lines, we just have to make sure we can bring the ball to ground and let Little Flash shark the packs.
It will be a good game and a big test for both sides tonight, I just hope the weather holds off. A perfect night would draw 5000+
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Dogwatcher » Fri May 05, 2006 4:59 pm

Cmon Doggies!!!!!!!!! *hopeful*
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby Wedgie » Fri May 05, 2006 5:43 pm

Latest News:

Gill's playing.
:D
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby duncs7 » Sat May 06, 2006 12:41 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Doesn't matter who the forwards are if the midfield can get it in quick to a leading forward goals will be scored. Don't get me wrong North will miss Gill but not enough to even up the contest. FWIW NNorth will have a better conversion rate (goals:points) this game. :lol: :lol:

About two thirds of Norths goals last week were kicked by their midfield or resting midfielders in the forward line.

At the minute North have the best midfield in the comp, not having both Gowans for Centrals will relieve the pressure some what on the North midfield and allow them to deliver it more quickly to the forwards who ever they are.

That is why North will win this game.


Jimmy wrote:But i think North will win and put another nail in the coffin of the dogs dynasty (this doenst mean im writing them off just yet....but its getting close)


Afterthoughts guys?
\:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/
Beware the dogs are comin. Red, white and blue......
User avatar
duncs7
Under 18s
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Argana Park
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Wedgie » Sat May 06, 2006 12:45 am

duncs7 wrote:Afterthoughts guys?
\:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/
Beware the dogs are comin. Red, white and blue......


How about thoughts from Thursday night?

:lol:

Wedgie wrote:I'm putting some money on Central, got some inside info about a possible late change to North tomorrow! :wink:
Hopefully I can get a piece of the $3 being offered.


Ended up getting $2.80 but can't complain. :wink:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby duncs7 » Sat May 06, 2006 12:50 am

How many coins did ya flip on? I know someone who did very very well with this match.
User avatar
duncs7
Under 18s
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Argana Park
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Wedgie » Sat May 06, 2006 12:53 am

duncs7 wrote:How many coins did ya flip on? I know someone who did very very well with this match.


$50 for a $140 return and a $90 profit. :wink:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby duncs7 » Sat May 06, 2006 12:55 am

Wedgie wrote:
duncs7 wrote:How many coins did ya flip on? I know someone who did very very well with this match.


$50 for a $140 return and a $90 profit. :wink:

Very Tidy lil bet. Beer money for the weekend Ay. Good on ya, u did call it thursday. Ur not as one eyed as some of the other cocks on here.
User avatar
duncs7
Under 18s
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Argana Park
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby StrayDog » Sat May 06, 2006 1:22 am

Noticed that one agent had Central at $8 for a 40+ win.
StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1455
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Carpark.
Has liked: 1329 times
Been liked: 205 times

Postby am Bays » Sat May 06, 2006 8:46 am

duncs7 wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Doesn't matter who the forwards are if the midfield can get it in quick to a leading forward goals will be scored. Don't get me wrong North will miss Gill but not enough to even up the contest. FWIW NNorth will have a better conversion rate (goals:points) this game. :lol: :lol:

About two thirds of Norths goals last week were kicked by their midfield or resting midfielders in the forward line.

At the minute North have the best midfield in the comp, not having both Gowans for Centrals will relieve the pressure some what on the North midfield and allow them to deliver it more quickly to the forwards who ever they are.

That is why North will win this game.


Jimmy wrote:But i think North will win and put another nail in the coffin of the dogs dynasty (this doenst mean im writing them off just yet....but its getting close)


Afterthoughts guys?
\:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/
Beware the dogs are comin. Red, white and blue......


So I'm wrong not for the first time and not for the last, well done Dogs, Duncs 7 go read my post after we beat you and my updated predictions at no stage had I written the Dogs off....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19721
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |