The Big Shrek wrote:jumbo wrote:You probably get the impression that I am not a fan of that draconian bylaw!!
Draconian? Bit rich there mate. There used to be a mercy rule in basketball on the plains too. Maybe the committees have switched over.
While I may not agree with the rule at least people are turning their attention to the difference between the top and bottom junior teams.
Losing may build character but so does playing for the other side. You'd soon find out who the mature players were when asking them to put the oppositions jumper on. I remember a young Nathan Young pulling on the Pt Wakefield jumper before the merger. He was the dominant force in colts footy at the time and played a cracker of a game.
By all means bag the rule but recognise the problem and maybe even give some possibe solutions.
The problem is certainly recognised but I dont believe pulling the rest of the league down to a lower level is the answer. Push/assist/force the clubs that need help to lift its numbers and improve, help their coaches, surely that is a more constructive and pro-football response. What is the role of the junior committee? To assist struggling clubs? Another question : where are the WWTE in this area? When was the last time anyone saw a WWTE official at any game? Where are they in assisting with junior development?
There are other league clubs whose development zone area are much further from Adelaide who do a lot more for their Junior development than we have ever seen in APFL. How about the WWTE helping out these struggling junior clubs - running clinics at their Ovals, promoting football in their areas - after all its the WWTE zone.
Has the APFL investigated any other options? It would appear not but if they have I for one would love to hear them if it helps to understand how the league came to this decision.
Lots more questions.