South Problems

All discussions to do with the SANFL

South Problems

Postby Ruck Legend » Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:49 am

I believe the problems at South do not relate to management but to a bunch of old players who seem to control the club. Maybe they should leave it to the people in charge and the club maybe better off. The southern suburbs need a very strong South Adelaide and if I didn't barrack for Sturt I would follow the panthers. They have not made the finals I think since 1990 which is a bloody long time. Play the locals, develop the club and get them to finish 2nd next year cause Sturt will the win flag so the best they can no is second.
Ruck Legend
Rookie
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 11:19 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby zipzap » Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:39 am

What are the problems going on at the moment? Last night K..k..kk..kenneth was alluding to the fact that something was up at Noarlunga but he wouldn't go into it at this stage
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 39 times

Postby Jimmy » Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:49 am

what would kkk.kkk.KKk.kenneth know...no doubt he can tell ya what jocks the roo is wearing... :lol:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: South Problems

Postby Pseudo » Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:32 am

Ruck Legend wrote: They have not made the finals I think since 1990 which is a bloody long time.

Since 1992. Haven't won one since 1990. Haven't won two since 1979.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12230
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1650 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Postby stan » Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:03 am

So what are they doing about this then. Get a whole stack of recurits....nah that didnt work, maybe the coach might have to be looked at. Or maybe they should try to build a team around some good younger players instead of buying a team?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15512
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Postby therisingblues » Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:40 am

It would be great if they could actually make the finals. We may witness a "Woodville-like" showing from non-represented fans hoping to see the SANFL's perennial loser do well. I hope the die hard South fans aren't too hard on those that jump aboard, they'll never build up a supporter base if they choose to punish their newly acquired fans when the team is doing well.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Postby MightyEagles » Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:08 pm

It seems that South always have a problem. I mean look at their oval for one, they've got slow growing trees and oval drainage problems and a road at the northern end (in the outter) that when it rains is muddy for days after.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Postby Grand Central » Wed Nov 23, 2005 3:32 pm

A bunch of old players don't win games today. Get rid of them. There is not one "old player" at South who can lay claim to a successful culture. Old players are better off sitting in the stands reminiscing about what could have been. They had their chance long ago.
User avatar
Grand Central
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Centrals BBQ
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Eddie Expert » Wed Nov 23, 2005 3:45 pm

Did I hear somewhere that Nunan was involved at South?
Eddie Expert
 

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:18 pm

Why wasn't Mark Demasi playing senior football?
I really can't work that one out.
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Postby blueandwhite » Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:22 pm

South have all sorts of issues away from the playing side of the club at present.
There are 5 vacant board positions with a heap of candidates including a ticket of past players who have a number of issues with the board and the on field performance last year.
The current board have positioned the club in the soundest financial position since our inception into the sanfl.
My personal opinion is that the board should be left to do its work and get on with the job. If the past players ticket is successful I see unrest and another under achieving season ahead.
Apparently there is to be work done prior to the commencement of the season on spectator facilities,including terracing.
Tiocfaidh ár Lá
User avatar
blueandwhite
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1656
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Cloney Harp
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 219 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Postby Wedgie » Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:48 am

Here's a link to the article in the paper about it today:
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/footy/story_page/0,8747,17434088%255E21546,00.html
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Rushby Hinds » Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:29 am

blueandwhite, good call. From my limited background knowledge of the "challengers" @ South, their business and corporate skill sets appear to be less then the incumbent directors, and may stuff up a whole lot of good work off the field. They may also get a surprise if they are elected to the many facets of running a footy club, which is just a tad more then getting 21 players and a coach to turn up at the correct oval every week.
User avatar
Rushby Hinds
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Rushby Hinds » Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:51 am

One of the past players is having a tilt at his 3rd time on the Board,
having spat the chewie 2 times previously and resigning. I would have
thought the members would want someone on the board that actually has the
gumption to guts it out. Notwithstanding, that board member was actively
involved in establishing all the things that he is now complaining about !
User avatar
Rushby Hinds
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Jman » Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:56 pm

I agree play the local boys and hopefully more people from down the South will follow the panthers.
I also agree that our ground is shocking, with the amount of money the club gets it could use this cash to make the venue a better standard for SANFL patrons.
I think the current board should be left alone as they are doing a good job with the off field. We were one of the first clubs to use pokie machines and although people dont like to hear this they are the saviour of the SANFL clubs.
Now many clubs have copied that and saved themselves, E.g North.
The Current recruiting techniques have to be blamed on the coach Pyman, however I think he should be allowed the full year to improve his track record. Pyman is directly responsible for our current player coming and goings.
However he was willing to go full time and that got him the job.
Anderson was doing the right thing developing local boys, but wouldn't go full time so the club got rid of him, wrong move in my books. Ando promoted Warren, Manhood, Jackson, Demasi, Stevens and Newberry just to name a few. However now Warren only gets a full game, a shame that these other players weren't allowed to develop more at league level.
Melrose Park that aint South I'm talking about the real South.
User avatar
Jman
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: The Real South
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time


Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], mots02, northerner and 50 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |