by Jimmy » Fri May 19, 2006 11:59 pm
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 12:32 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 12:38 am
Mr66 wrote:Any photos on the way Wedgie?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Rooster_cracker » Sat May 20, 2006 12:44 am
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 12:48 am
Rooster_cracker wrote:What a bloody great win again aganist the odds. yet again most off the tipsters pick norwood.7 top players out and beat a pretty much full streath side. yet again we just toughed it out all game and came out tops. It's a great great club.......
come on the bays do us a favour a beat port and put us clear top.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 12:50 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 20, 2006 9:42 am
Rooster_cracker wrote:What a bloody great win again aganist the odds. yet again most off the tipsters pick norwood.7 top players out and beat a pretty much full streath side. yet again we just toughed it out all game and came out tops. It's a great great club.......
come on the bays do us a favour a beat port and put us clear top.
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat May 20, 2006 9:46 am
Wedgie wrote:Just for a different point of view, I (and most North/Norwood fans I stood with tonight) thought that Steven Bayley, ie Albino man was absolutely senational, easily BOG IMHO.
It's no coincidence he won the Norwood forum player of the year last year, he was fantastic.
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 9:56 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote: but I am not understanding this comment about winning "against the odds".
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by drebin » Sat May 20, 2006 5:43 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Rooster_cracker wrote:What a bloody great win again aganist the odds. yet again most off the tipsters pick norwood.7 top players out and beat a pretty much full streath side. yet again we just toughed it out all game and came out tops. It's a great great club.......
come on the bays do us a favour a beat port and put us clear top.
I don't want to detract from the victory as it was well deserved and North are the better team, but I am not understanding this comment about winning "against the odds". Even without those players, North still had a better group of players than we did. Norwood weren't full strength.
by GWW » Sat May 20, 2006 9:32 pm
Wedgie wrote:What a sensational game!!!!!!
I'm over the moon, to me this win was almost as important as last week.
Gutsy, gusty effort by the lads in a game tht was non stop attacking (despite the scoreboard) from end to end.
A great night to watch a great win, we looked like we were strulggling at half time but Jars worked his magic yet again.
Motlop was sensatinal and if the game was closer easily the matchwinner, to this moment I"m still astounded that some people would question his comittment to the red and white, he was great, easily the best forward on the ground despite playing most of the game from the wing.
His mark (?) in the goal square at the Northern end was something to behold, I think the umpire paid it purely on his unbelievable leap.
You're a champ Daniel, its amazing how well a player will play with a coach that doesn't base his gameplan around satisfying the ego of Tredrea.
GREAT WIN NORTH!!
Captain Younie comes through again.
I'm happy as a pig in poo.
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 10:24 pm
GWW wrote:Wedgie wrote:
You're a champ Daniel, its amazing how well a player will play with a coach that doesn't base his gameplan around satisfying the ego of Tredrea.
Motlop had 8 touches and 9 CLANGERS against Collingwood a few weeks ago, i'm not sure how much you can attribute that to Tredrea.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by GWW » Sat May 20, 2006 10:34 pm
Wedgie wrote:GWW wrote:Wedgie wrote:
You're a champ Daniel, its amazing how well a player will play with a coach that doesn't base his gameplan around satisfying the ego of Tredrea.
Motlop had 8 touches and 9 CLANGERS against Collingwood a few weeks ago, i'm not sure how much you can attribute that to Tredrea.
I didn't attribute anything to Tredrea, I said (and I've bolded it above) that I attributed it to the coach. Sorry, I thought my point was obvious.
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 10:37 pm
GWW wrote:Ahh so Choco is on the sidelines yelling out "do a Clanger Daniel, do a Clanger, we'll see if we can go for 9 this week even if you dont have that many possessions....make sure you dont do anything with the ball Daniel, and if you do happen to do a clanger well it'll be my fault anyway".
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by GWW » Sat May 20, 2006 10:43 pm
Wedgie wrote:GWW wrote:Ahh so Choco is on the sidelines yelling out "do a Clanger Daniel, do a Clanger, we'll see if we can go for 9 this week even if you dont have that many possessions....make sure you dont do anything with the ball Daniel, and if you do happen to do a clanger well it'll be my fault anyway".
No, but he does coach Daniel and the side around Daniel, hence why he's called a coach.
I thought it was obvious that in a lot of players make clangers if coached incorrectly or being placed in a team which would enhance errors to occur.
He's showed before and again last night that his skill level has nothing to do with it, once again, obvious I thought.
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 10:46 pm
GWW wrote:The guy is a big boy, surely he can do something with the ball if he gets it 8 times. And as for Tredrea, well i suppose it would make sense to base your forward line around him given that he he is a champion. Maybe they should put him in the back pocket so Motlop can play centre half forward and base the whole forward line around him. Surely thats obvious, i mean is that obvious, or am i just repeating the word obvious too much, hmm not sure if thats obvious or not.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by GWW » Sat May 20, 2006 11:10 pm
Wedgie wrote:GWW wrote:The guy is a big boy, surely he can do something with the ball if he gets it 8 times. And as for Tredrea, well i suppose it would make sense to base your forward line around him given that he he is a champion. Maybe they should put him in the back pocket so Motlop can play centre half forward and base the whole forward line around him. Surely thats obvious, i mean is that obvious, or am i just repeating the word obvious too much, hmm not sure if thats obvious or not.
If Port was full of big boys then going on your logic they wouldn't require a coach. Probably not a bad idea with Choko's recent gameplans.
Port should base their forward line around Damon White, Tredrea's a hack and has no right to have the word champion in the same sentence as his name.
When talking to a couple of Power trainers I also found out not only is Tredrea a hack but that he's an A Grade rude prick to his own club's support staff.
Anyway, if you want to discuss further Choko or Tredrea, start a thread in the AFL forum, I might join in.
Back on Topic.
Motlop was awesome and North were great, if someone had told me we'd win the last 2 games with the injury list we had I would have thought they were joking. Being near the Port ferals who only arked up when they were 9 goals up today made last week's victory even more sweeter, not that they said anything to me as I had my North hat on today.
by Wedgie » Sat May 20, 2006 11:18 pm
GWW wrote:I wasn't the one who brought up Williams' and Tredrea's name in the SANFL section.
GWW wrote:I'm sure the NAFC wouldnt want to have their performances in the 1980's based on a certain grand final towards the end of the decade.
GWW wrote:Yes Port have some fairly ordinary supporters, but i dont believe they have a mortgage on supporters with half a brain missing.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by GWW » Sat May 20, 2006 11:31 pm
Wedgie wrote:GWW wrote:I wasn't the one who brought up Williams' and Tredrea's name in the SANFL section.
You're right but at least my initial comment was regarding a player's performance in an SANFL game but as I said you're right, if I do have an issue or a gripe I've posted it in the wrong forum.GWW wrote:I'm sure the NAFC wouldnt want to have their performances in the 1980's based on a certain grand final towards the end of the decade.
Agreed just like I'm sure the PAFC woudln't want to have their performance in the 1900's based on the 1905 Grand Final result.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |