Byron Pickett
26 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by Booney » Mon May 22, 2006 3:26 pm
It was taken out of context.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
Booney - Coach
-
- Posts: 61656
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has liked: 8202 times
- Been liked: 11936 times
by sydney-dog » Mon May 22, 2006 4:14 pm
I was very critical of Byron's conditioning and form at the begining of the year, but it seems he needs games to run himself in to fitness, over the past 6 weeks he has shed some kg's and the form has followed, along with some team success credit to him
Can anyone explain to me why the Power gave him the boot, this is the type of player they are screaming for
Can anyone explain to me why the Power gave him the boot, this is the type of player they are screaming for
- sydney-dog
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
by ORDoubleBlues » Thu May 25, 2006 5:15 pm
sydney-dog wrote:I was very critical of Byron's conditioning and form at the begining of the year, but it seems he needs games to run himself in to fitness, over the past 6 weeks he has shed some kg's and the form has followed, along with some team success credit to him
Can anyone explain to me why the Power gave him the boot, this is the type of player they are screaming for
Would be Power supporters on this site that no more about it than myself but it had more to do with off field issues.
-
ORDoubleBlues - League - Top 5
-
- Posts: 3275
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 16 times
- Grassroots Team: Wisanger
by sydney-dog » Thu May 25, 2006 7:32 pm
ORDoubleBlues
It still seems a little strange, if my mail is right their has been a few player issues "off field" at the Power in recent years
It still seems a little strange, if my mail is right their has been a few player issues "off field" at the Power in recent years
- sydney-dog
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
by Magpiespower » Fri May 26, 2006 4:38 am
It was in the best interests of both party's for Byron to go.
He was just as unreliable as a junior at Port - that's why he wasn't picked in the inaugural squad.
Nobody ever doubted his talent.
Seriously doubt he would be playing the type of footy he is now had he stayed at Alberton - too many off-field distractions.
He was just as unreliable as a junior at Port - that's why he wasn't picked in the inaugural squad.
Nobody ever doubted his talent.
Seriously doubt he would be playing the type of footy he is now had he stayed at Alberton - too many off-field distractions.
-
Magpiespower - Coach
-
- Posts: 6292
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:12 am
- Location: Salisbury
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 125 times
- Grassroots Team: Salisbury
26 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Football AFL
Who is online
Advertisements by Advertisement Management