Leaping Lindner wrote:Psyber wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:No prejudice here Psyber. I think his mother is a fantastic person a "true" liberal. Not someone who sold their soul to John Howard's "drys" like her son did.
I disagreed with him to his face about both the workplace arrangements and the handling of the David Hicks affair and he was civil about it, if non-commital.
His dilemma was that having stood down from the leadership in favour of John Howard, for what he saw at the time as the greater good, and pledged loyalty in doing so to JH's leadership, he was, in his view, bound to honour that committment and not sow dissension in the party. I think he genuinely believed in the rightness of most of the policies, and declined to comment when he disagreed, as part of that pledge of loyalty. Had JH stepped down in office and another leader taken over then he would have been free to speak his mind.
Personally, I favour a less right wing position than was manifest in government under either Howard, or Hawke/Keating.
That's were we differ. No dilemma in my book. You either have a backbone or you don't. Downer quite clearly doesn't same as his mate Costello.
So someone who disagrees with a policy of their employer must state so publicly? You're smarter than that, LL.