by Footy Chick » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:24 am
by zedman » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:25 am
by zedman » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:29 am
by Footy Chick » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:33 am
zedman wrote:hi FC..2nd half might be more interesting..keep the cameras rolling..never know what action you might get in a relegation battle
had a nice wrap on channel 7 this week for our 97 y/o bbq steward art bradshaw, been at the club since the mid 1940's !!!..make sure you check him out FC
by turk186 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:50 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:53 am
zedman wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:How did you attract the Murphy's zedman? Bit of spare change lying around Kenilworth?
your a smart lad shrek..im sure you can work it out
i have not said anywhere there is something wrong with paying players..have I?
i have said it would be nice to have 35k each year to spend..which is about 32k more than we have each year..dig?
by The Big Shrek » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:59 am
zedman wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:How did you attract the Murphy's zedman? Bit of spare change lying around Kenilworth?
your a smart lad shrek..im sure you can work it out
i have not said anywhere there is something wrong with paying players..have I?
i have said it would be nice to have 35k each year to spend..which is about 32k more than we have each year..dig?
by sprinttospace » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:39 am
by zedman » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:50 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:02 am
by The Big Shrek » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:11 am
zedman wrote:you know what happens when you assume shrek..
how do you know wes? ..did you get cleaned up by him one day and have never forgotten it?
this is wes and kanes second year at the club, i dont see how that means we are in the market to pay players,of course if the right player comes around and he is worth some dollars then we will try and secure him, but we are a div 5 club with no pokies or council handouts and we do what we can with what we have got.. they have a mate who is an official at the club and they joined last year..got anything bad to say about kane as well?
we have a 100+ league game, saafl represenative, a1 premiership player who plays for nothing..as does all our leadership group..we have no identity as a "suburban" club as kenilworth does not exist as a suburb and we have no tie ins with sanfl clubs or high schools..we get players anyway we can through mates and our juniors..we struggle at times but that makes it sweeter when we win..
maybe you should concentrate on playing finals and not choking with your "million dollar team"
by BenchedEagle » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:54 am
Harder u defend Greensheilds the better he plays mate, the best defenders against Trentice is athletic tall defenders who use their heads instead of bodys. Smithies have noone even close to stoppin 2 big guys like stobbes and Rizer. Eagles by 5 goals @ Anderson Walkzedman wrote:smithies and elizabeth should fall smithies way by 5-6 goals imo..stop stobbe and allen, tag platten and defend grenshields hard and its all over
by BenchedEagle » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:01 pm
by zedman » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:11 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:zedman wrote:you know what happens when you assume shrek..
how do you know wes? ..did you get cleaned up by him one day and have never forgotten it?
this is wes and kanes second year at the club, i dont see how that means we are in the market to pay players,of course if the right player comes around and he is worth some dollars then we will try and secure him, but we are a div 5 club with no pokies or council handouts and we do what we can with what we have got.. they have a mate who is an official at the club and they joined last year..got anything bad to say about kane as well?
we have a 100+ league game, saafl represenative, a1 premiership player who plays for nothing..as does all our leadership group..we have no identity as a "suburban" club as kenilworth does not exist as a suburb and we have no tie ins with sanfl clubs or high schools..we get players anyway we can through mates and our juniors..we struggle at times but that makes it sweeter when we win..
maybe you should concentrate on playing finals and not choking with your "million dollar team"
Getting a bit fired up buddy? When you question other teams about how they throw money around you open yourself up to the same questions. There obviously is some money at Kenilworth and this was all I was pointing out.
I'm not sure if Wes would risk putting his hair out of place to clean someone up. I hear Kane is a nice guy, so no, nothing bad to say about him.
by zedman » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:14 pm
by BenchedEagle » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:19 pm
I heard 27 of those goals came straight out the midfield so easily Trent never even got a look in! hahazedman wrote:duncs: a 19 y/o in his first season of A grade held him to about 4 kicks on saturday and 2 goals when elizabeth kicked 29..so i disagree..and i wouldnt call allen a big guy..very good player but hes stoppable and so is stobbe if you are smart enough to make him pay when he leaves his man..we werent obviously
by BenchedEagle » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:21 pm
by zedman » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:53 pm
duncs wrote:I heard 27 of those goals came straight out the midfield so easily Trent never even got a look in! hahazedman wrote:duncs: a 19 y/o in his first season of A grade held him to about 4 kicks on saturday and 2 goals when elizabeth kicked 29..so i disagree..and i wouldnt call allen a big guy..very good player but hes stoppable and so is stobbe if you are smart enough to make him pay when he leaves his man..we werent obviously
by The Big Shrek » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:22 pm
zedman wrote:
and yes kane is a top bloke..you must have come across wes when kilburn played edwardstown and looks like he made an impression of sorts !
by turk186 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:24 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |