pafc1870 wrote:It really is just a token amount of green in the Eagles guernsey. If I was a Woodville supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
If I was a Port supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.

by Aerie » Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:15 am
pafc1870 wrote:It really is just a token amount of green in the Eagles guernsey. If I was a Woodville supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
by RustyCage » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:07 pm
Aerie wrote:pafc1870 wrote:It really is just a token amount of green in the Eagles guernsey. If I was a Woodville supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
If I was a Port supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
by once_were_warriors » Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:55 am
by cd » Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:28 pm
by cd » Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:22 am
by Mickyj » Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:52 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Aerie wrote:pafc1870 wrote:It really is just a token amount of green in the Eagles guernsey. If I was a Woodville supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
If I was a Port supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
Go on, explain why a Port supporter would be pissed off?
by cd » Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:13 am
by MightyEagles » Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:22 am
by am Bays » Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:28 pm
by McAlmanac » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:09 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Lets hope the Eagles players get into the spirit of wearing a West Torrens guernsey and put in a typical display to remind us how we remember West Torrens v Glenelg clashes.....
by McAlmanac » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:11 pm
once_were_warriors wrote:From a former woodville supporter
I think the club has done quiet well in all regards of representing both clubs history
Eagles as club nickname, honours West Torrens
Home ground Woodville Oval honours Woodville.
Games at Thebby , which i once was going to boycott is now probably ok recognition of West Torrens history.
The one thing that gives me th Sh@#s is th guernsey and uniform.
Shocking guernsey to start with and the lack of green does not represent the history of Woodville.
How the club can persist with this is staggering
At least the shorts and socks should be green , this would be fairer. Cant get much worse than it is now
I hope the club looks into a more traditional football guernsey/uniform next year
I support the Eagles with passion , the result on the weekends sets my mood for the rest of the week.
The club should change the guernsey as a more representable statement of both former clubs
by Wedgie » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:19 pm
McAlmanac wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Lets hope the Eagles players get into the spirit of wearing a West Torrens guernsey and put in a typical display to remind us how we remember West Torrens v Glenelg clashes.....
Does spelly or anyone have a record of West Torrens v Glenelg clashes from 1955-1970, which encompasses the "Big Eagle" guernsey era? The last four years might tip towards Glenelg, but I suspect this Eagle guernsey might have had the wood on the Bays during its lifetime.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by am Bays » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:45 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Lets hope the Eagles players get into the spirit of wearing a West Torrens guernsey and put in a typical display to remind us how we remember West Torrens v Glenelg clashes.....
by am Bays » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:46 pm
Wedgie wrote:Changed club Tassie?
by Mickyj » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:48 pm
McAlmanac wrote:once_were_warriors wrote:From a former woodville supporter
I think the club has done quiet well in all regards of representing both clubs history
Eagles as club nickname, honours West Torrens
Home ground Woodville Oval honours Woodville.
Games at Thebby , which i once was going to boycott is now probably ok recognition of West Torrens history.
The one thing that gives me th Sh@#s is th guernsey and uniform.
Shocking guernsey to start with and the lack of green does not represent the history of Woodville.
How the club can persist with this is staggering
At least the shorts and socks should be green , this would be fairer. Cant get much worse than it is now
I hope the club looks into a more traditional football guernsey/uniform next year
I support the Eagles with passion , the result on the weekends sets my mood for the rest of the week.
The club should change the guernsey as a more representable statement of both former clubs
I think you speak for a lot of people.
by Aerie » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:33 am
by Wedgie » Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:35 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by RustyCage » Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:24 am
Mickyj wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Aerie wrote:pafc1870 wrote:It really is just a token amount of green in the Eagles guernsey. If I was a Woodville supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
If I was a Port supporter, I'd be pretty pissed off.
Go on, explain why a Port supporter would be pissed off?
Well I as an Eagles fan can not tell you why youd be pissed off mate .But can you answer me which Port Adelaide football club won all the flags .Can you also tell me and most of the port fans which team plays in the SANFL because when you play port the majority of port fans wear the Power's colours and not the magpies !!
geez mate and your pissed off at a small amount of green in a WWT jumper at least our fans wear eagles colours to a game and not an AFL clubs colours.
Get a life PAFC1870 or go down to the port river and get over the new damn bridge !!
by RustyCage » Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:35 am
Wedgie wrote:Very disappointed to see the replica Torrens guernsey today in the paper, a poor effort by the club and as a lover of the SANFL history I think they failed miserably on 4 points but I'm willing to conced on the last:
1) Fake laces look shocking, I was the biggest critic of North's first heritage guernsey when they did this, its also on the current Magpies guernsey, looks like a joke as laces were there for a practical purpose and not part of the actual design of the guernsey, no need to include them, they look gay.
2) Hill sponsorship, now correct me if I'm wrong but Hills weren't sponsoring Torrens in the 50s? Completely cheapens the guernsey and compromises the design. North found Robert Gerard very understanding when leaving Mistral off their heritage guernsey, I'm sure a great sponsor such as Hill would be willing to do the same for one week so as not to compromise the integrity of the guernsey
3) As above but this time with the Jax Sports emblem which isn't as big, if other clubs can manage no sponsors on their heritage guernsey how hard would be to leave off at least 1 on the front (I dread to see the back, could be another point there)
4) The Eagle, now unless my Bob Hank book has been doctored the Eagle on this new guernsey looks shocking
Some may think I'm being petty but as a loyal lover of the history of the SANFL I think a shocking job has been done here. I'll wear my heritage top from last year to show them how it should have been done. Poor effort Eagles.
(And I don't expect the usual one eyed suspects to agree with me on any points and may I point out I was just as critical of North's first effort on one of the points and would have been equally critical on all of the points if they'd arisen for North, this rant is made purely as a lover of the SANFL)
by am Bays » Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:42 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |