by JAS » Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:23 pm
EAGLES wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:EAGLES wrote:JAS wrote:Guys are you now talking about the Sturt v Centrals game? because there is a seperate thread for that one ...please try to leave this one for the game quoted in the subject heading.
Thank you
Regards
JAS
Sigh........
Its very relevant on sport when discussing the next game to discuss what happened in the last game.
How is an umpiring decision in last week's game have anything to do with this week?
Well the other thread is talking about an umpiring decision in 1996!
Why aren't they all getting warned as well?
Firstly...my original post was NOT a warning...it was a request...I don't, as a rule, use 'please' and 'thank you' if I'm warning people.
If by 'other thread' you are referring to the Norwood v Port review then they would have received a similar request if the mention of 1996 was irrelevant but as far as I can tell it was raised as a counter-arguement to comments made about the bias of a certain umpire...which would give it relevance to that discussion.
Regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.
We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump
Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually