by luvcricket » Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:59 pm
by Ian » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:02 pm
by MW » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:06 pm
by luvcricket » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:12 pm
by luvcricket » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:15 pm
by The Big Shrek » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:21 pm
by Psyber » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:25 pm
by A Mum » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:29 pm
Psyber wrote:Do they still allow you a 10 kph margin? They give you 3 kph in Victoria, and I don't think there are any signs before or after them here.
by luvcricket » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:32 pm
by Squawk » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:34 pm
luvcricket wrote:The cop just sits in the car, whereas normally they hold the radar gun.
by mick » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:35 pm
MW wrote:I know a great method of beating the speed cameras....stick to the speed limit stupid
by heater31 » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:38 pm
Squawk wrote:luvcricket wrote:The cop just sits in the car, whereas normally they hold the radar gun.
They are not cops in the car, they are speed camera operators - standard public servants. Tolerances are not made public here in SA.
by Psyber » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:53 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:00 am
by heater31 » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:01 am
Psyber wrote:I think in most states speedometers are allowed a 10% accuracy margin so at 60k it could read anything from 54 to 66 kph and be legal, and at 110 it could read from 99 to 121.
Back in the late 1980s in SA the cops just allowed 10 kph because they couldn't be expected to be able to work out 10%.
Here in Vic. at 60 kph they allow you 3kph [5%] - less than legal speedo variance - and at 100Kph they still only allow 3kph...
Your speedo being within legal range and misleading you into speeding in not a defence in Victoria.
by spell_check » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:13 am
by heater31 » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:17 am
spell_check wrote:heater, do you find that cars regularly overtake you, even though it says you are doing say 3-4 km/h over the limit? Becuase that's what happens to me - I'm always doing less than what the speedo says. So I thought that may happen to you and that's why you didn't get fined.
by spell_check » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:21 am
by heater31 » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:25 am
spell_check wrote:
I would have thought if you didn't get the fine by 4 weeks later, then you wouldn't get one.
by Squawk » Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:45 am
heater31 wrote:yeah but the SA minister had no troubles revealing the tolerances of Victoria so you work it out![]()
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |