by The Big Shrek » Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:40 pm
by Pag » Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:17 pm
Well said ZZ.zipzap wrote:Pag wrote:
Insterad of striking, I wouldn't mind seeing AEU members only doing the 38 hours a week that full-time work entails. I'd bet the Government would love seeing blank report cards at the end of the year, horribly planned and run lessons, and no tests or assignments marked. Could probably scrap lunch and recess duty under that scheme as well.
Well, that's what our school is doing at the moment - we've chosen not to go on strike but focus on the core business of learning and teaching, while putting on hold the extra-curricular stuff which we truly do heaps of at a school like mine (eg. camps, performances, sports, open nights etc).
It's an interesting scenario - the naive idea was that not striking would limit the impact on the learning of the kids and hopefully reinforce the idea to parents that our core business is teaching their children and that all the extra stuff we do unpaid is icing on the cake, done out of the goodness of our collective heart. The idea is that we do our 38 hours and that's it (the reality of course is not much has changed re my workload - I still do my planning, assessment, training after school).
It got a bit of a (negative) run on Ch 7 and 5AA, thanks largely to a certain newsreader whose child attends the school.
The reaction, I've got to say, has been mostly negative despite some very vocal minority support. It has been seen as quite mean-spirited to deprive kids of their camps especially. But the amount of parents who think a teacher babysitting their kids on a 3 night camp is their God-given right is gob-smacking. (This is the first year I think I've not taken a class on camp BTW and I could count on one hand how many times I've actually been thanked). And, no, you never ever get paid to go on camp - tell me another profession where that would be allowed to happen??
There is actually one agitator who because his kid has chosen to play interstate volleyball all of the final week of school and will thus miss Graduation (another out-of-hours 'expectation' which incidentally staff voted to retain despite the dispute), is furious that teachers will not move the ceremony to the weekend instead. Sorry mate, perhaps in the past but not now... There is still this perception in the community that teachers begin at 9 and knock off at 3 - an incredibly insulting and ignorant view that I'm quite sick to death of to be honest. Unfortunately, despite its intentions, I don't think our school's actions have remedied this situation.
As for things that give you the sh1ts, I'm sick and tired of letters to the editor saying teachers need to join the 'real world', whatever that is, before lumping in their claims with the lot of the automotive industry or child care workers etc as in today's paper (teaching is a University qualified profession and it's not unreasonable to suggest that rates of pay reflect this). I dare say today's modern classroom is a lot more 'real' than when many people went to school - an absolute multi-cultural, socio-economic melting pot where real issues are investigated, technology explored, skills honed etc. A lot more 'real' than being terminally embedded in the same identikit cubicle with a window that doesn't open.
I'm all for performance based pay rates though quite how you do it I'm not sure. There was a guy from the NY Ed system on the 7.30 Report the other night who had some very confronting but powerful possible solutions, but I doubt anyone here would be brave enough to implement them here. BTW teachers DO go through annual performance management / review meetings with their line managers, like Tassie suggests, but if I'm being totally honest, this could afford to be a whole lot more rigorous.
by Psyber » Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:36 pm
Nursing used to be regarded as a profession, particularly when the training was in hospitals and they were not being churned through theoretical courses with little practical experience.The Big Shrek wrote:Is nursing a profession Psyber?
I take your point though, the government does not like groups thinking they are better at running themselves than the government.
Rann is having a fair go at debasing the legal profession too, starting with the courts.
Lucky for us that if there is a group who don't like giving up power more than politicians, it's lawyers!
by The Big Shrek » Sat Nov 08, 2008 4:08 pm
by Mic » Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:02 pm
zipzap wrote:Pag wrote:
Insterad of striking, I wouldn't mind seeing AEU members only doing the 38 hours a week that full-time work entails. I'd bet the Government would love seeing blank report cards at the end of the year, horribly planned and run lessons, and no tests or assignments marked. Could probably scrap lunch and recess duty under that scheme as well.
Well, that's what our school is doing at the moment - we've chosen not to go on strike but focus on the core business of learning and teaching, while putting on hold the extra-curricular stuff which we truly do heaps of at a school like mine (eg. camps, performances, sports, open nights etc).
It's an interesting scenario - the naive idea was that not striking would limit the impact on the learning of the kids and hopefully reinforce the idea to parents that our core business is teaching their children and that all the extra stuff we do unpaid is icing on the cake, done out of the goodness of our collective heart. The idea is that we do our 38 hours and that's it (the reality of course is not much has changed re my workload - I still do my planning, assessment, training after school).
It got a bit of a (negative) run on Ch 7 and 5AA, thanks largely to a certain newsreader whose child attends the school.
The reaction, I've got to say, has been mostly negative despite some very vocal minority support. It has been seen as quite mean-spirited to deprive kids of their camps especially. But the amount of parents who think a teacher babysitting their kids on a 3 night camp is their God-given right is gob-smacking. (This is the first year I think I've not taken a class on camp BTW and I could count on one hand how many times I've actually been thanked). And, no, you never ever get paid to go on camp - tell me another profession where that would be allowed to happen??
There is actually one agitator who because his kid has chosen to play interstate volleyball all of the final week of school and will thus miss Graduation (another out-of-hours 'expectation' which incidentally staff voted to retain despite the dispute), is furious that teachers will not move the ceremony to the weekend instead. Sorry mate, perhaps in the past but not now... There is still this perception in the community that teachers begin at 9 and knock off at 3 - an incredibly insulting and ignorant view that I'm quite sick to death of to be honest. Unfortunately, despite its intentions, I don't think our school's actions have remedied this situation.
As for things that give you the sh1ts, I'm sick and tired of letters to the editor saying teachers need to join the 'real world', whatever that is, before lumping in their claims with the lot of the automotive industry or child care workers etc as in today's paper (teaching is a University qualified profession and it's not unreasonable to suggest that rates of pay reflect this). I dare say today's modern classroom is a lot more 'real' than when many people went to school - an absolute multi-cultural, socio-economic melting pot where real issues are investigated, technology explored, skills honed etc. A lot more 'real' than being terminally embedded in the same identikit cubicle with a window that doesn't open.
I'm all for performance based pay rates though quite how you do it I'm not sure. There was a guy from the NY Ed system on the 7.30 Report the other night who had some very confronting but powerful possible solutions, but I doubt anyone here would be brave enough to implement them here. BTW teachers DO go through annual performance management / review meetings with their line managers, like Tassie suggests, but if I'm being totally honest, this could afford to be a whole lot more rigorous.
by Aerie » Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:31 pm
Pag wrote:Insterad of striking, I wouldn't mind seeing AEU members only doing the 38 hours a week that full-time work entails. I'd bet the Government would love seeing blank report cards at the end of the year, horribly planned and run lessons, and no tests or assignments marked. Could probably scrap lunch and recess duty under that scheme as well.
by Mic » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:41 am
Aerie wrote:Pag wrote:Insterad of striking, I wouldn't mind seeing AEU members only doing the 38 hours a week that full-time work entails. I'd bet the Government would love seeing blank report cards at the end of the year, horribly planned and run lessons, and no tests or assignments marked. Could probably scrap lunch and recess duty under that scheme as well.
Good idea. 38 hours, and 4 weeks annual leave...
by hearts on fire » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:15 pm
by Dirko » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:25 pm
hearts on fire wrote:The teachers have snagged another strike tomorrow, how many has this been for the year? 4 or 5? (not that I'm complaining)
by hearts on fire » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:27 pm
SJABC wrote:hearts on fire wrote:The teachers have snagged another strike tomorrow, how many has this been for the year? 4 or 5? (not that I'm complaining)
Nope..the strike is OFF ! The IRC ordered the teachers to work...
Here's the link CLICK HERE
Off to school you go. I heard on the news and advised my sister and she's dirty, as she has rescheduled her whole day including baby sitting duties
etc with my Mum. She thinks she'll just stick to the plan and not send her in. If they mark her as away she'll go troppo !
by Thiele » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:35 pm
better call your school in the Morning Hofhearts on fire wrote:SJABC wrote:hearts on fire wrote:The teachers have snagged another strike tomorrow, how many has this been for the year? 4 or 5? (not that I'm complaining)
Nope..the strike is OFF ! The IRC ordered the teachers to work...
Here's the link CLICK HERE
Off to school you go. I heard on the news and advised my sister and she's dirty, as she has rescheduled her whole day including baby sitting duties
etc with my Mum. She thinks she'll just stick to the plan and not send her in. If they mark her as away she'll go troppo !
okay doesn't matter, we still have the day off i think. The school sent us all a note home stating that there wasn't enough staff to take care of all the kids.
it's to late to get everyone to school, alot of schools have already called it off, so the teachers have still got their way, empty class rooms.
by hearts on fire » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:37 pm
by Squawk » Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:28 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:10 am
by mick » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:04 am
The Big Shrek wrote:Traditionally a profession required:
its own set of ethics, monitored by the profession;
a theoretical body of knowledge capable of being transfered;
professional authority, so what the professional says goes. So you can't say to the doctor, 'your wrong give me some drugs for my cold' but yo can say to the guy at the hardware shop 'give me some hay to make my house'.
I think there were a couple of other requirements, can't really remember though. There is some debate about what is required.
by zipzap » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:30 am
Squawk wrote:6. A teacher on $75k a year
by mypaddock » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:50 am
zipzap wrote:Squawk wrote:6. A teacher on $75k a year
Wow, I'd like to meet this teacher. Must be in the private system. Or WA perhaps.
To those like Squawk who love getting stuck into teachers at any given opportunity, who like to compare 'our holidays' with 'their holidays', teachers having it easy according to other more noble professions, my job hasn't had a pay rise so why should you lazy layabouts blah blah etc etc (just keep wheeling out the cliches...) ... please remember what this dispute is really about.
SA teachers are the worst paid in the country, by a long shot. Whether or not the cost of living here is less is irrelevant - the fact is it's becoming increasingly difficult to attract the better, brighter candidates (and push out the tired baby boomers but that's another story) as evidenced by the fact that the TER for teaching has dropped markedly in recent years.
Bottom line is (and this is the same argument given by the recently successful and publicly supported doctors' dispute) if our base line salary in SA is not competitive, we run the risk of having a poorer education system. Surely any parent capable of rational though sees that and wants the very best for their kids. It's not rocket science, and I know some won't believe it, but it's bigger than the individual.
by Wedgie » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:51 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:01 am
by Hondo » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:33 am
zipzap wrote:SA teachers are the worst paid in the country, by a long shot. Whether or not the cost of living here is less is irrelevant - the fact is it's becoming increasingly difficult to attract the better, brighter candidates (and push out the tired baby boomers but that's another story) as evidenced by the fact that the TER for teaching has dropped markedly in recent years.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |