by FD88 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:44 pm
by Rik E Boy » Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:59 pm
by topsywaldron » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:01 pm
FD88 wrote:They're good, but our best is good enough to do the job.
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:02 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:We haven't won this yet boys. Rain clouds gathering and we've got an impatient look about us as Ntini and Steyn are hanging about.
regards,
REB
by Dirko » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:02 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:We haven't won this yet boys. Rain clouds gathering and we've got an impatient look about us as Ntini and Steyn are hanging about.
regards,
REB
by FD88 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:10 pm
topsywaldron wrote:FD88 wrote:They're good, but our best is good enough to do the job.
Apart from the first two deciding tests of the series obviously.
by RoosterMarty » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:10 pm
FD88 wrote:Bah, I can't be bothered stepping lightly around the issue; quite simply if Clark comes with us to SA and is 100% fit we'll knock them over imo. They're good, but our best is good enough to do the job.
Yes the pitch has been tough for the team batting last but there have been plenty of good batting periods too. We've gone in with a kindergarten bowling attack including two debutants; no experienced spearhead in there - no Lee, no Clark. They've lost Smith but everyone else is still there. If they lose this much ascendancy against such a green bowling line up when all they've lost is a single batsman (hell we'll thrown in Prince although Duminy has looked pretty bloody good) then they've got more to worry about than us imo, especially when you consider that we've basically been carrying Hayden and Hussey through the series.
by FD88 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:13 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:FD88 wrote:Bah, I can't be bothered stepping lightly around the issue; quite simply if Clark comes with us to SA and is 100% fit we'll knock them over imo. They're good, but our best is good enough to do the job.
Yes the pitch has been tough for the team batting last but there have been plenty of good batting periods too. We've gone in with a kindergarten bowling attack including two debutants; no experienced spearhead in there - no Lee, no Clark. They've lost Smith but everyone else is still there. If they lose this much ascendancy against such a green bowling line up when all they've lost is a single batsman (hell we'll thrown in Prince although Duminy has looked pretty bloody good) then they've got more to worry about than us imo, especially when you consider that we've basically been carrying Hayden and Hussey through the series.
Yesterday you said RSA would probably chase this target down yet now you think we will win in South Africa if Clark plays....
by Thiele » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:14 pm
by Thiele » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:20 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:21 pm
by FD88 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:22 pm
by Dirko » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:22 pm
Thiele wrote:Will Smith
by Thiele » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:26 pm
by FD88 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:27 pm
NFC wrote:This is a joke.
by NFC » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:27 pm
FD88 wrote:Smith has disappeared from view, commentators think he might be getting into his whites.
by locky801 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:27 pm
by locky801 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:29 pm
by NFC » Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:30 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |