Warner or Marsh ?

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Warner or Marsh ?

Postby panther » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:15 am

David Warner or Shaun Marsh, who should be in the 50 over australian team
Marsh is in the squad, Warner is not, the selectors must make an obvious decision, one is a potential superstar the other on this seasons form should be playing Grade cricket
These are the records of both players this domestic season [hope I didnt miss any games]

Marsh

Sheffield Shield
25, 74*,5,30,1,15,16,1....167 runs @ 23-85

Ford Ranger
1[8]...13[13]...18[14]...27[42]...21[27]....71[123]..........151 runs of 227 balls s/rate 66

Big Bash
1[5]...31[19]...11[10]....25[22].......68 runs off 56 balls s/rate 121


Warner

Sheffield Shield
nil

Ford Ranger
31[35] batting at 7....0[2] batting at 6 then dropped[?] from the team !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
then the reserrection after missing or being dropped for 2 games he returned as an opener
18[27]...165[112]....97[54].....31[20]....1[6]....343 runs off 256 balls s/rate 133

Big Bash
8[5]...28[22]...65[35]... 101 runs of 62 balls ...s/rate 162




International form this season

20-20 International
Marsh 9 [9]
Warner 89[43]


The final damning stat for Marsh
Ford ranger Marsh has made 151 runs in 227 balls in 6 innings
29th november Warner made 165 runs in 112 balls in 1 innings


Who should be the first opener picked ?
In my opinion he is not in the ODI squad [yet]
panther
Rookie
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:56 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby The Ash Man » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:16 am

Pretty self-explanatory I reckon
Marsh aint much chop
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby panther » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:12 pm

A list of the openers or guys that can open state by state that must be considered as good or better than Marsh

queensland
watson
hopes
hayden [but retired]

new south wales
jaques [but injured] the forgotten man
hughes
katich
warner !!!

victoria
quinney
rogers
hodge

tasmanina
dighton
birt
lockyear

south australia
harris
klinger

western australia
ronchi

the list of openers who are not as good as Marsh in domestic cricket

perron
davis


aplogies if i have overlooked or missed any other players good or better
panther
Rookie
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:56 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Hondo » Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:25 am

Bit of a reality check for Warner last night I thought.

Interesting to see what happens when International standard bowlers get a chance to do some homework beforehand.

Given it's 20-20 you can no more rely on his first game than last night in making an assessment. However, I think it shows that we need to be a bit careful with our expecations on a couple of our young (potential) guns around the country. The step up from state cricket is bigger than we sometimes think. Especially for Warner he has a lot of development still to do in First Class cricket.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:27 am

Did Warner miss out last night? Must be time for him to retire then.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby The Ash Man » Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:46 am

Rik E Boy wrote:Did Warner miss out last night? Must be time for him to retire then.

regards,

REB


=))
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby NFC » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:34 pm

Marsh easily, easily.

Look at him today, and that was him coming into the game 'out of form'. I told you, get him at international level and he provides results. Marsh= future of Australian cricket. Get him into the #6 spot at test level ASAP.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby rod_rooster » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:38 pm

NFC wrote:Marsh easily, easily.

Look at him today, and that was him coming into the game 'out of form'. I told you, get him at international level and he provides results. Marsh= future of Australian cricket. Get him into the #6 spot at test level ASAP.


If Marsh is the future of Australian cricket the future looks pretty bleak.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby NFC » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:39 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
NFC wrote:Marsh easily, easily.

Look at him today, and that was him coming into the game 'out of form'. I told you, get him at international level and he provides results. Marsh= future of Australian cricket. Get him into the #6 spot at test level ASAP.


If Marsh is the future of Australian cricket the future looks pretty bleak.

Gem of a poster.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby rod_rooster » Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:38 pm

NFC wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
NFC wrote:Marsh easily, easily.

Look at him today, and that was him coming into the game 'out of form'. I told you, get him at international level and he provides results. Marsh= future of Australian cricket. Get him into the #6 spot at test level ASAP.


If Marsh is the future of Australian cricket the future looks pretty bleak.

Gem of a poster.


Thanks ;)
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby panther » Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:20 pm

Well Done little swampy
Marsh's domestic season has been poor, But his International 50 over form is outstanding.
This is why the selectors stuck with him and did not groom Warner, round 1 to those selectors, and NFC is :D
panther
Rookie
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:56 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby westozfalcon » Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:31 am

Actually this David Warner hysteria would never have got off the ground had mid-on been about 2-foot deeper last Sunday for the first over of the innings. Warner's mis-timed thrash off Makhaya Ntini only just cleared Albie Morkel's outstretched (and very safe) hands.

There's no doubting Warner's skill as a big hitter but a little bit of luck can sometimes take you a long way in a short time!

He played a very ordinary shot when Steyn knocked his middle pole back at the Gabba on Tuesday.

At this stage Shaun Marsh is the better batsman by a fair margin.
westozfalcon
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Perth WA
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby RoosterMarty » Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:58 pm

A half century in a ODI means you should be #6 in Tests?
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby NFC » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:41 pm

RoosterMarty wrote:A half century in a ODI means you should be #6 in Tests?

Some people have a little thing called foresight.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:50 pm

I reckon Shaun Marsh has done really well so far in the one dayers and I might have been a bit quick to bag him based on his Warriors form, or lack of it. Problem is, the guy has got into the high 70's twice and hasn't gone on with it twice. I reckon another 50 runs over those two knocks and the test spot would have been his. His inability to finish off might relegate him to 'one dayers only'. He really coughed up his wicket today in particular.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:52 pm

westozfalcon wrote:Actually this David Warner hysteria would never have got off the ground had mid-on been about 2-foot deeper last Sunday for the first over of the innings. Warner's mis-timed thrash off Makhaya Ntini only just cleared Albie Morkel's outstretched (and very safe) hands.

There's no doubting Warner's skill as a big hitter but a little bit of luck can sometimes take you a long way in a short time!

He played a very ordinary shot when Steyn knocked his middle pole back at the Gabba on Tuesday.

At this stage Shaun Marsh is the better batsman by a fair margin.



I'd have to agree. I'd leave Warner in for the rest of this series though and just give him the freedom to play naturally. You can't expect a young guy who hasn't even played a Shield game to consistently belt the best bowler in Cricket around the place. He copped a beauty today but he was trying to play a pretty funky shot.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby MightyEagles » Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:02 pm

Marsh.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Ned » Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:19 pm

I dont understand how Warner can get a game from two good performances in the Ford Ranger and one in the KFC Big Bash, surely it would be beneficial to give Hughes a game especially if he is to replace Hayden in the test matches. Gilchrist always said that being involved in the odi team before making his debut in test cricket helped him and made him feel comfortable from the first ball of his test career.
Such Is Life
User avatar
Ned
Rookie
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:49 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:21 am

Ned wrote:I dont understand how Warner can get a game from two good performances in the Ford Ranger and one in the KFC Big Bash, surely it would be beneficial to give Hughes a game especially if he is to replace Hayden in the test matches. Gilchrist always said that being involved in the odi team before making his debut in test cricket helped him and made him feel comfortable from the first ball of his test career.


I have to say I was thinking the same thing when Warner walked off yesterday.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Warner or Marsh ?

Postby Hondo » Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:32 am

What worries me about Warner is if the demons start nagging him about his lack of first-class experience

It would take a confident player to put that behind him and feel like he belongs in International cricket

I'd hate to see us de-rail a great talent by putting OTT expectations on him too early. That first 20-20 innings could end up being his curse.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Next

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |