by sturtpeter » Sun Dec 04, 2005 4:21 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Dec 04, 2005 4:44 pm
sturtpeter wrote:Thanks also to Wedgie for clarifying the reason that North won't be playing Sturt at Unley. If only North were as gracious when they switched their programmed Adelaide Oval clash back to Prospect several year's ago:)
by rd » Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:37 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:22 pm
rd wrote:I'm a Sturt man and can't complain with the 2006 draw.....Sturt fans cannot whinge about the draw.
by sturtpeter » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:26 pm
by Punk Rooster » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:59 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by ORDoubleBlues » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:08 pm
by MatteeG » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:12 pm
by Jimmy » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:18 pm
ORDoubleBlues wrote:The only two problems I have with the draw are that for at least the second year running we have the bye before the state game and that the club specifically requested a game against Port for the opening handful of rounds, yet the SANFL has somehow managed to schedule our first clash with Port for round 14!!!!
by therisingblues » Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:11 am
Jimmy wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:The only two problems I have with the draw are that for at least the second year running we have the bye before the state game and that the club specifically requested a game against Port for the opening handful of rounds, yet the SANFL has somehow managed to schedule our first clash with Port for round 14!!!!
agreed, esp when we had a celebration planned for the 26, 66 & 76 flag wins in which 2 were vs port...im sure the SANFL could have sorted us out on those two requests, but it looks as tho most teams didnt get what they wanted....but this will not have any effect on where we finish on the ladder...i look forward to the challenge to play the eags and dogs 3 times, gives us more chances to beat them and wouldnt that be sweet!!!!
by drebin » Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:55 am
rd wrote:I'm a Sturt man and can't complain with the 2006 draw. Sturt's 2005 draw should have seen them finish in the top 3 but the team suddenly couldn't beat teams like Norwood and North...
by ElizabethVCRThief » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:21 am
Punk Rooster wrote:A good team will win, no matter where they play. It's really only the supporters who care where the game's played (and their perception of how it's crucifying the team). Losers make excuses, winners don't. Only one point I will make, and that it is not right that sides be penalise with preparation (ie a team playing a Sunday/Monday game, backing up on a Fri night, when the other side has had the bye). This happened to the Dogs (I think) this year, and North have it next year. I say it's disgraceful, no matter which team has it. This was evident also in the AFL- same thoughts there.
by Jimmy » Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:06 pm
ElizabethVCRThief wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:A good team will win, no matter where they play. It's really only the supporters who care where the game's played (and their perception of how it's crucifying the team). Losers make excuses, winners don't. Only one point I will make, and that it is not right that sides be penalise with preparation (ie a team playing a Sunday/Monday game, backing up on a Fri night, when the other side has had the bye). This happened to the Dogs (I think) this year, and North have it next year. I say it's disgraceful, no matter which team has it. This was evident also in the AFL- same thoughts there.
by MightyEagles » Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:54 pm
by Jimmy » Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:32 pm
MightyEagles wrote::lol: What's the bet that Sturt will be unhappy with the 2007 SANFL Draw this time next year.
by Dog_ger » Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:31 pm
by Punk Rooster » Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:47 pm
ElizabethVCRThief wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:A good team will win, no matter where they play. It's really only the supporters who care where the game's played (and their perception of how it's crucifying the team). Losers make excuses, winners don't. Only one point I will make, and that it is not right that sides be penalise with preparation (ie a team playing a Sunday/Monday game, backing up on a Fri night, when the other side has had the bye). This happened to the Dogs (I think) this year, and North have it next year. I say it's disgraceful, no matter which team has it. This was evident also in the AFL- same thoughts there.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by SBR » Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:12 pm
MightyEagles wrote::lol: What's the bet that Sturt will be unhappy with the 2007 SANFL Draw this time next year.
by Rooster_cracker » Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |