Fantasy SANFL 2007

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Fantasy SANFL 2007

Postby rsemmler » Fri Aug 18, 2006 5:43 pm

Not sure if anyone else is in the AFL Herald Sun 'Supercoach' league but it's a great concept and I've really got into it this year. Basically it's similar to the Fantasy Premier League where you get a salary cap and pick players from all the clubs to play off against other 'Supercoaches'. Each player racks up points for things like kicks, goals, clangers, etc (all stats which are available to us from the SANFL).

Wedgie/Spellcheck, any way of getting a website like this running for the SANFL next year? Great way to get some interest going in our comp.
rsemmler
Member
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:51 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Wedgie » Fri Aug 18, 2006 5:49 pm

Great idea but a hell of a lot of work.
The only way I could see it working would be if there was an "honour" system involved where people added up their own stats.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby MightyEagles » Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:37 pm

Good idea, how about getting the SANFL or Phil H to help out with the stats.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Postby zipzap » Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:42 pm

That would be cool, maybe something for the SANFL to consider for 2007. Certainly a better publicity prospect than another year of Tim Shaw ads.
I enjoy the AFL Dream Team comp, but I don't enjoy the AFL itself so it's all a bit hollow...

Go the Squids!
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 39 times

Postby heater31 » Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:06 pm

MightyEagles wrote:Good idea, how about getting the SANFL or Phil H to help out with the stats.




SANFL wont go for it because it requires forward thinking and they dont do that at West Lakes these days

but its worth a try
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16677
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Postby Ecky » Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:09 am

I have been heavily involved in various AFL Fantasy Football competitions since 1997 and have often wondered whether it would work in the SANFL. I have never pursued the idea seriously for the following reasons

:arrow: The bye means that managers who have players who have the bye are disadvantaged in those rounds (this is the biggest issue by far)
:arrow: It has been harder to get SANFL stats in electronic form (this may not be such an issue now thanks to PhilH and Spelly)
:arrow: There are not set team lists like the AFL so it much messier organising which players are eligible (much higher turnover of players)
:arrow: Having AFL listed players means that many of the better players will annoyingly be "dropped" during the season
:arrow: Overall there is less interest in the SANFL so it will be harder to get enough interest to run a successful competition
:arrow: Personally, I predominantly see the AFL as a fantasy-football stats generating machine, while the SANFL is where I forget about player stats totals and just care about Glenelg. I am happy to keep it that way.

BUT...if anyone is keen to put in the hard work and organise a competition, I would be interested in being involved to an extent in organising it - I have spent far too much of my spare time thinking about fantasy football rules :lol:

PS heater31 - you must have seen the Chaser tonight :wink:
User avatar
Ecky
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:26 am
Location: Wherever the stats are
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 78 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Postby spell_check » Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:22 am

Marks should have a greater weight in the SANFL. :wink:
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby heater31 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:37 am

to get around these problems perhaps it could be prohibited from selecting AFL listed players and expand the bench players to combat the bye or limit the number of players that can be selected from each club. dont know how to get around the very large group of player each club can pick their teams from




Ecky wrote:PS heater31 - you must have seen the Chaser tonight :wink:


Yes I did watch the Chaser tonight but not usally my regular friday nite viewing. Heard Chis and Craig talking on Robbie Buck's Triple J show this arvo and completely lost it at work for about 10 mins and decided to tune in to see the vision as well.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16677
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Postby spell_check » Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:48 am

heater31 wrote:to get around these problems perhaps it could be prohibited from selecting AFL listed players and expand the bench players to combat the bye or limit the number of players that can be selected from each club. dont know how to get around the very large group of player each club can pick their teams from


Perhaps a maximum amount of players you can choose from one club in the squad?
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby Punk Rooster » Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:05 am

4 players per club (36 in total)-
a forward
a midfielder
a defender
a utility
Having a squad of 36 allows you to select your best 22 each week considering the bye.
No trades, what you select is what you got.
I reckon the mob that run the AFL one put in a lot of work- there must be formulas for re-adjusting a players value mid season etc.
Would be too hard I think, but enjoyable.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby heater31 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:08 am

Punk Rooster wrote:4 players per club (36 in total)-
a forward
a midfielder
a defender
a utility
Having a squad of 36 allows you to select your best 22 each week considering the bye.
No trades, what you select is what you got.
I reckon the mob that run the AFL one put in a lot of work- there must be formulas for re-adjusting a players value mid season etc.
Would be too hard I think, but enjoyable.



could we put a 2 week trade period mid season to offload any players who sustain season ending injuries?? just a suggestion feel free to shoot me down
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16677
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Postby TroyGFC » Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:28 am

I like bigfootys concept a player for each team, best score. We could use the MAils stats as true(even though not).
http://www.palmoilaction.org.au/

JUST SMASH 'EM TIGERS!!
User avatar
TroyGFC
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Meningie, formally at Warradale
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Meningie

Postby spell_check » Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:28 am

Punk Rooster wrote:4 players per club (36 in total)-
a forward
a midfielder
a defender
a utility
Having a squad of 36 allows you to select your best 22 each week considering the bye.
No trades, what you select is what you got.
I reckon the mob that run the AFL one put in a lot of work- there must be formulas for re-adjusting a players value mid season etc.
Would be too hard I think, but enjoyable.


Good idea. 8)
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby spell_check » Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:28 am

heater31 wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:4 players per club (36 in total)-
a forward
a midfielder
a defender
a utility
Having a squad of 36 allows you to select your best 22 each week considering the bye.
No trades, what you select is what you got.
I reckon the mob that run the AFL one put in a lot of work- there must be formulas for re-adjusting a players value mid season etc.
Would be too hard I think, but enjoyable.



could we put a 2 week trade period mid season to offload any players who sustain season ending injuries?? just a suggestion feel free to shoot me down


Good idea as well. 8)
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby mal » Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:57 am

I reckon I would win.
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30179
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2104 times
Been liked: 2126 times

Postby westside » Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:14 pm

Ecky wrote: :arrow: The bye means that managers who have players who have the bye are disadvantaged in those rounds (this is the biggest issue by far)


All teams have an equal number of byes, so the problem is evenly distributed over the year. You may get screwed by it in round 3, but another player will get screwed in round 17, etc etc. All evens out in the end.
westside
Under 16s
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:11 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time


Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |