by mal » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:44 am
by mal » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:47 am
bayman wrote:great game both sides had opportunities to win & north took theirs at the right time (for them) i at least hope that our players realise that they can more than match the top sides & the players from both sides should be applauded in they way they played it was quick attacking football & they (both sides) put their bodies on the line with no malice or spite & i hope my friend MAL at least watched the game so he can tell me that i'm wrong & we were suspect at "body pressure" as i dont think we are any worse at 'body pressure' than anyone else, i was proud of their efforts today
by Wedgie » Sun Aug 20, 2006 2:39 am
mal wrote:WEDGIE congratulations on the Safooty blooper of the year
Ian Perrie wins the game for North not Glenelg!
Dont despair mate you and your team had the last laugh.
by Punk Rooster » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:10 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i dont think there is anything wrong with our inclusions this week i would have Rogers in instead of Duldig but losing willo both must play and Jack Horan has been really good in the ressies the last few weeks and deserves a call up
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by am Bays » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:52 am
Punk Rooster wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i dont think there is anything wrong with our inclusions this week i would have Rogers in instead of Duldig but losing willo both must play and Jack Horan has been really good in the ressies the last few weeks and deserves a call up
Duldig kicked 7...
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:10 am
Punk Rooster
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
i dont think there is anything wrong with our inclusions this week i would have Rogers in instead of Duldig but losing willo both must play and Jack Horan has been really good in the ressies the last few weeks and deserves a call up
Duldig kicked 7...
by Pseudo » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:25 pm
Wedgie wrote:Just be glad they didn't take Perrie, a huge plus for the Bays that he's in our side.
by RoosterMarty » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:34 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:46 pm
Pseudo wrote:Wedgie wrote:Just be glad they didn't take Perrie, a huge plus for the Bays that he's in our side.
! ! ! !
So you're the supporter Jars was talking about in today's writeup! (Sunday Mail, 20/8)
by Stevie_K » Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:34 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:19 pm
sydney-dog wrote:Can anyone confirm how Perrie and Hudson played ?
by sydney-dog » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:26 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:29 pm
sydney-dog wrote:Wedgie
Given the crows recent performanace, and the Sarge and Huddo's form over the past three weeks, how seriously do you think they will come under consideration
by sydney-dog » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:33 pm
by rod_rooster » Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:58 am
by Jimmy » Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:03 am
by Ian » Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:31 am
Jimmy wrote:should north have won by more if they had kicked straight or was it as close as the score suggests?
by Stevie_K » Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:38 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |