by bayman » Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:48 pm
by JAS » Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:01 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:00 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by hearts on fire » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:11 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:I'm a tad superstitious, & don't mind reading them.
However, I don't live my life by them.
by Thiele » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:13 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:I'm a tad superstitious, & don't mind reading them.
However, I don't live my life by them.
by bayman » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:14 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:We need a poll bayman!
by Pseudo » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:52 pm
by JK » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:56 pm
mick wrote:bullshit no other word for it
by therisingblues » Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:38 am
Pseudo wrote:Being born on a cusp (23 July), half of the papers had me as a Leo and the other half as a Cancer. I would read both and pick the one I liked best![]()
I don't take them seriously and rarely read them, but believe that they might have some utility from a Freudian point of view... Most of the daily capsule horoscopes are written in broad, general terms. It is possible that on reading a horoscope, the reader's subconscious would affect his/her interpretation of that horoscope. It thereby acts as a sounding board, allowing thoughts to crystallise and bringing them to the forefront of consciousness. I point out that any such utility, real or imagined, is completely tangential to the intended purpose of the horoscope.
I knew a bloke who was seriously into astrology. After expressing curiosity about exactly what he did, he took down my birth details, and the next time I saw him he produced one of those "natal chart" thingies with all the planets and other bodies in various positions at the time of my birth. He proceeded to explain the whole thing to me. I did gain a better appreciation of the whole astrology thing, and how it might be useful to anyone who was seriously in to it. Again, much of the utility I see is in the fact that the results and interpretation are broad and ill-defined, and what can be learned about an individual is more from his own interpretation of the chart, rather than any inherent property of the chart itself. I don't for a second believe that the positions of astral bodies at the moment of your birth has any influence on you, your personality or your life. One could generate a natal chart completely at random, and it would still work as a sounding board for the subject's own thoughts. Again I stress that this property is entirely tangential to the proclaimed purpose of astrology.
by Booney » Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:49 am
Constance_Perm wrote:mick wrote:bullshit no other word for it
Im with you Mick
by Footy Chick » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:04 am
by A Mum » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:11 am
by Psyber » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:40 am
by Wedgie » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:43 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Punk Rooster » Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:34 pm
Wedgie wrote:Im a Virgin, whoops I mean Virgoean.
Id guess a lot of IT workers would be too.
PS I give astrology as much creedence as religion, ie none
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by SABRE » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:10 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |