by daysofourlives » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:59 am
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:27 pm
by mighty hounds » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:36 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Sunday Mail's country footy preview has him playing at Willaston.
by Texas Rattlesnake » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:39 pm
by Pinch Hitter » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:53 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:57 pm
Pinch Hitter wrote:From what i hear willaston won't clear him to smithfield so james could be watching more footy than he plays this year.
I am assuming with all the intrigue that this bloke can play a bit? anyone on here know what sort of player he is?
by maddog009 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:01 pm
by Old Dog 13 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:01 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:03 pm
Pinch Hitter wrote:From what i hear willaston won't clear him to smithfield so james could be watching more footy than he plays this year.
I am assuming with all the intrigue that this bloke can play a bit? anyone on here know what sort of player he is?
by hawkseye » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:14 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Pinch Hitter wrote:From what i hear willaston won't clear him to smithfield so james could be watching more footy than he plays this year.
I am assuming with all the intrigue that this bloke can play a bit? anyone on here know what sort of player he is?
How could Willaston stop him from getting cleared back? Unless they paid him some cash up front they'd have no reason to hold him.
by zedman » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:37 pm
by Old Dog 13 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:39 pm
zedman wrote:Blackfriars V Kenilworth
Pulteney V The Farmers
Hope Valley V Plympton
Rosewater V Smithfield
Elizabeth V Westminster
tough one the last pick..elizabeth always very tough to beat at home..only reason i picked them..not confident
by zedman » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:42 pm
by Pinch Hitter » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:49 pm
demonseye wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Pinch Hitter wrote:From what i hear willaston won't clear him to smithfield so james could be watching more footy than he plays this year.
I am assuming with all the intrigue that this bloke can play a bit? anyone on here know what sort of player he is?
How could Willaston stop him from getting cleared back? Unless they paid him some cash up front they'd have no reason to hold him.
Sounds like a contract has been signed somewhere, Dogwatchers point is right on the money.
by Bluedemon » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:49 pm
by heater31 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:26 pm
kookas wrote:
Some real challenging games to start round 1. Good tests for Westminster and Hope Valley who have come up a grade. Hoping that Kenilworth can be competitive in their first game. Perrie in his first game for the navy blues could get off to a flying start with at least 4 plus goals (if he kicks straight of course)
by magpie » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:45 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:old farmer wrote:Heard up at the Settlers on the weekend that Ingle Farm have knocked back clearances for 4 players as unfinancial. As i know for a fact that all A grade players were sponsered last year and not required to pay subs personally how can you now put them down as unfinancial because they want a clearance As i was a player sponser last year i find this unaccetable and won't be putting any more money in if i don't know where it's going. Pooraka, Modbury and Hectorville, i wouldn't be paying any money out until you look into it
If true, not cool
by daysofourlives » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:12 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Pinch Hitter wrote:From what i hear willaston won't clear him to smithfield so james could be watching more footy than he plays this year.
I am assuming with all the intrigue that this bloke can play a bit? anyone on here know what sort of player he is?
He's classy and flashy![]()
great little player (well actually he's pretty tall), would be a shame if he couldn't play much footy this year. Willaston would have to have a bloody good reason not to clear him.
It would be worth Smithfield paying subs to Willaston if they're claiming unfinancial just to get him back.
by The BulldogLover » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:43 pm
Top dog 13 wrote:zedman wrote:Blackfriars V Kenilworth
Pulteney V The Farmers
Hope Valley V Plympton
Rosewater V Smithfield
Elizabeth V Westminster
tough one the last pick..elizabeth always very tough to beat at home..only reason i picked them..not confident
Are you sure about the first one???
by Old Dog 13 » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:56 am
The BulldogLover wrote:Top dog 13 wrote:zedman wrote:Blackfriars V Kenilworth
Pulteney V The Farmers
Hope Valley V Plympton
Rosewater V Smithfield
Elizabeth V Westminster
tough one the last pick..elizabeth always very tough to beat at home..only reason i picked them..not confident
Are you sure about the first one???
Topdog13 how did you pull up big guy???
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |