THACHY_7 wrote:Felch wrote:piccachu wrote:i watched the portland and hills game on saturday and para hills look to be a very good side no 10 who i believe is hanson or something like that was way to good for any one we had to stand him, pushed the less stronger bodies of the portland defender out of the contest way to easily. i wouldnt mind finding out how close to full strength there side was on the weekend because i spoke to 2 para hills players after the game one said that was there full strength side and other one said still have plenty to come in?
I thought Hanson played well, and was dominant early - think he kicked 2 of Para Hills first 3 ??? He was all over his first opponent, but i thought Granleese broke even, if not got slightly the better of him, once he was switched to him. It looked as though early on Hanson would kick a big bag, but was held to 3. I thought our defenders did an 'ok' job to restrict them to 16 goals, especially seeing how much ball actually went down there. Goodwin cut us to absolute ribbons, thought Jarvis played well too.
Hanson kicked 3 goals 5 behinds 2 out of bounds and had a fair few assists..
Its fair to say he had the better of his opponent/s saturday, he jus failed to capitalise on the scoreboard..
There was atleast 5 or 6 off the top off my head that were missing from saturday and 2-3 will walk straight into the A's..
The others played majority in the A's last year but will most probably make there way back in the 2's
I knew he missed a few, and he definately played well. Once Granleese went on to him though, he had someone who could, at the very least, match it with him physically in the air. He is very strong in that regard. To only kick 1 goal in 3 and-a-bit quarters, when you guys were so dominant, is disappointing for a forward, i would have thought. Anyway, all very minor details. You blokes got the points, and gave us a footy lesson.
Im just trying to find some kind of small positives, out of a very ordinary day.
