Desalination Plant

Anything!

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby smithy » Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:15 am

Punk Rooster wrote:Maybe those who also rely on the Murray (NSW & Vic) should be practising storm water harvesting too- back into the Murray &/or their own reservoirs.
The Murray requires a National approach, SA on it's own can't save it.


Primary Producers aside, I can assure you Punk that there are many shack owners who don't give a rats about the water restrictions.
smithy
 

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby FlyingHigh » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:30 pm

spell_check wrote:
Mickyj wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:Storm Water Harvesting is the option I'd like the Government to develop.
Pump the water through a series of purifiers, back up into our reservoirs, where nature can take it's course.


Where is this storm water every one is talking about ?(not looking for a fight how do u harvest what doesn't fall from the skies)
Havent seen much rain in Adelaide in how long ?
The last shower we had here the top couple of millimetres of soil/sand was damp .


I guess it depends on the capacity of the system, but I don't think it takes a lot of rain to get an adequate supply. Especially if the system is extensive. And if we do get a wet winter (or spring) that will be more for it.


Yes, MickyJ, it is dry around this time of year, and maybe we would need to draw on the Murray for a few weeks, but there for the rest of the year there is no reason why Adelaide can't be self-sufficient through stormwater plus increased awareness of water conservation.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4911
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Swamp Donkey » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:59 pm

Quichey wrote:I too think there could be massive implications for the marine ecology (although I am no expert). Why are they so readily ignoring this?


This is the main issue Quichey, but Mr "I have to have my name on it" Rann refuses to consider the ecological implications of having both desal plants. Particularly for the Whyalla plant, which will return the saline brine to the upper reaches of Spencer Gulf, in an area which doesnt have sufficient flushing to dilute the brine, thus the salinity increase in this area will be ecologically catastophic. The effects on marine organisms will be enormous. The most publicised impacts need to highlight the impacts on key fishery and ecotourism-important species suc as the giant Cuttlefish which attract thousands of people to the area to view the only known breeding site for this species in the world and also the commercial and recreational Snapper fisheries. SA snapper catches are highest in Nthn Spencer Gulf and the increased salinities will greatly effect spawning success and settlement of juveniles in these important nursery-like regions, which will effect the abundance of adults available for the fisheries, both recreational and commercial.

I cannot believe the ignorance shown by our Government on this issue. It is a convenient remedy that will just shift the focus from a lack of water to a massive ecological problem, something that Mr Rann is happy to let the next Governement deal with!! Tool!
User avatar
Swamp Donkey
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:02 am
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 129 times
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Q. » Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:09 pm

Good summary Swampy.

If anyone wants to do further reading:

http://ffc.org.au/Desalination.html

There is also a link in there to a scientific study into the ecological footprint of desalinisation plants.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby oldfella » Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:24 pm

I can not understand why they are not harvesting the salt by on moving the brine to the existing salt pans near Salisbury & Port Wakefield roads intersection or having it as part of the new desal plant

or could not the heat from the cement factory & power station at osborne be used to boil off water to reclaim salt from strong brime solution

Value adding to produce a product for sale using waste heat.
oldfella
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:47 pm
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Swamp Donkey » Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:28 pm

oldfella wrote:I can not understand why they are not harvesting the salt by on moving the brine to the existing salt pans near Salisbury & Port Wakefield roads intersection or having it as part of the new desal plant

or could not the heat from the cement factory & power station at osborne be used to boil off water to reclaim salt from strong brime solution

Value adding to produce a product for sale using waste heat.


I dont think you understand just how much salt will be produced. While this may utilise some of the salt, the volumes produced by this process will be enormous and far far far exceed the demand for salt. If the brine was pumped offshore in a region such as the southern coast which is high energy, the dilution process would be much quicker and impacts will be reduced significantly as opposed to releasing it within the Gulfs, in which it would sit and accumulate constantly.
User avatar
Swamp Donkey
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:02 am
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 129 times
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby The Yetti » Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:02 pm

Does anyone know how many desalination plants there are world wide?
I know Israel has a few as do some of the other Middle East countries.

One would hope that our Government has seen the impact on the marine enviroment of those plants and have a bit of an idea.

We can always come up with a reason to stop development ....my goodness we had people complaining about the wind generators saying that dumb birds will fly into them etc.
SA is the driest state on the driest continent on earth.

Can I ask a dumb question.
Why do we want to divert the storm water running into rivers and creeks and then running out to sea and therefore harvest it, YET we need to keep the Murray flowing into the sea and not harvest it all.

bring on the 1956 flood, fill everything up and we can forget about it, do nothing AGAIN and then start the whole thing over again. PS The Murray stopped flowing in 1971. We had gnashing of teeth, pollies walking across the empty Murray mouth promising the world. Ithink Chowilla dam was the go then instead of a weir. 1973 great rains and it went a2way!!!!!37 years later we still rely on rain across the nation.

Build the Desalination plant
SO MANY IDIOTS
SO FEW BULLETS
The Yetti
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:59 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: McLaren

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Q. » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:43 am

Furthermore to the detrimental ecological effects the desal plant will have, building one still doesn't solve the problem of the dying River Murray.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Booney » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:47 am

Quichey wrote:Furthermore to the detrimental ecological effects the desal plant will have, building one still doesn't solve the problem of the dying River Murray.


It could.

The only way The Murray can be saved is by rain fall and we cant make that happen. We could restrict the amount of water the primary producers up stream use but most in the Riverland are onyl on single figure %age allocations now. ( Some on as little as 5% ).

Perhaps the desal plant could not only provide water to the metro area but also be used to flood the Lakes in the Coorong and bring the water levels back up.

As it has been said, this is a 1 in 1000 year drought and The Murray has seen a few of those in its time so lets build the Desal plant for us and let nature take care of The Murray. Perhaps as I said above we can help it a little.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61868
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8238 times
Been liked: 11976 times

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Q. » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:55 am

But why destroy one ecosystem to save another? Is it because the destruction of the marine habitat won't be as visible and we can easily forget it's happening, unlike the very obvious death of the Murray Basin.

I don't like the implications of a desal plant, I'd rather see harvesting of water by other means and having that pumped into the basin if necessary.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby leftlegger » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:09 am

Yeah, this thread has confirmed my worry.
I'm going to see if there are any action groups that will take the Govt to task on this, and join up.
Yeah, Naah,..... Bollocks!
User avatar
leftlegger
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: PHOS Camden

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Swamp Donkey » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:46 am

The Yetti wrote:Does anyone know how many desalination plants there are world wide?
I know Israel has a few as do some of the other Middle East countries.

One would hope that our Government has seen the impact on the marine enviroment of those plants and have a bit of an idea.

We can always come up with a reason to stop development ....my goodness we had people complaining about the wind generators saying that dumb birds will fly into them etc.
SA is the driest state on the driest continent on earth.

Can I ask a dumb question.
Why do we want to divert the storm water running into rivers and creeks and then running out to sea and therefore harvest it, YET we need to keep the Murray flowing into the sea and not harvest it all.

bring on the 1956 flood, fill everything up and we can forget about it, do nothing AGAIN and then start the whole thing over again. PS The Murray stopped flowing in 1971. We had gnashing of teeth, pollies walking across the empty Murray mouth promising the world. Ithink Chowilla dam was the go then instead of a weir. 1973 great rains and it went a2way!!!!!37 years later we still rely on rain across the nation.

Build the Desalination plant


On January 2008, 13080 desalination plants existed worldwide, so yes it has been a common remedy to a lack of freshwater for human use and nobody is disputing this. My major concerns are not based on whether or not the idea will work, it is the placement and the consequential ecological impacts of the plant if they were placed in the proposed sites. As mentioned earlier these sites could not be more "unsuitable" in terms of recieving adequate flushing to remove the brine. So my arguement is that yes, we would greatly benefit from a desal plant in SA, however I think they are just making the convenient decisions in terms of its placement.

Here is some more interesting reading:
http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstrea ... Plants.pdf

Just a thought, 100 years ago, water was not an issue, either was the hole in the ozone layer. Given that over 13000 desal plants now exist and appear an instant remedy to solve the ongoing water problems around the world, when will there be "too many" desal plants? is that possible? At our current rate in 100 years there will be millions around the world and surely there will be some ecological impacts by that time!

Wind farms are a completely different situation, there are no impacts what so ever with wind farms. The occasional bird flying into the turbines is not a valid reason to justify their removal. A stupid comparison. We're talking about complete ecosystems with the Desal plants, not the occasional loss of individuals.

In terms of catching storm water, there is a balance, in that yes the water courses and river and estuaries rely on flows for ecological health, but the main focus of this issue in SA is the vol of water that is lost down the Torrens when it floods. The Torrens is a river that be diverted and the water releases can then be controlled to maintain ecological health. At the moment this river floods and dries floods and dries and we dont capitalise on the floods.
User avatar
Swamp Donkey
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:02 am
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 129 times
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Booney » Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:29 pm

Quichey wrote:But why destroy one ecosystem to save another? Is it because the destruction of the marine habitat won't be as visible and we can easily forget it's happening, unlike the very obvious death of the Murray Basin.

I don't like the implications of a desal plant, I'd rather see harvesting of water by other means and having that pumped into the basin if necessary.


What water are you going to harvest?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61868
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8238 times
Been liked: 11976 times

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Q. » Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:39 pm

Booney wrote:
Quichey wrote:But why destroy one ecosystem to save another? Is it because the destruction of the marine habitat won't be as visible and we can easily forget it's happening, unlike the very obvious death of the Murray Basin.

I don't like the implications of a desal plant, I'd rather see harvesting of water by other means and having that pumped into the basin if necessary.


What water are you going to harvest?


Whatever annual rainfall we do actually get.

I should clarify that it is the proposed locations of the desal plant that makes it unacceptable.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby Zelezny Chucks » Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:17 pm

Swampy, in your opinion, would it be a better alternative to place it somewhere outside of the Gulf??
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 95 times
Grassroots Team: Morphett Vale

Re: Desalination Plant

Postby smithy » Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:22 pm

v
Quichey wrote:Furthermore to the detrimental ecological effects the desal plant will have, building one still doesn't solve the problem of the dying River Murray.

These taken from Mypolonga today.
You will notice 2 pictures with willows mid stream.
They have fallen in the river from riverbank "slumping" or landslides from the banks drying up too quickly and not getting its moisture back.
This has happened a few times the past 2 months and is happening far more regularly as days go by.
Cracks are now appearing under shacks meaning that the days are numbered before they slide into the river also.
To answer Booneys question, DWLBC scientists suggest that even after 5 years in a row of above average rainfall, the river will only recover to a reasonable state.
The first picture showing the depth meter you may not be able to see, but near the top where the 4 metre mark is, shows the level of the 1956 flood.
Attachments
mypo water depth.jpg
Water meter
(249.23 KiB) Downloaded 39 times
mypo jetty.jpg
Mypo jetty
(195.8 KiB) Downloaded 41 times
mypo slumping 2.jpg
Mypolonga slumping
mypo slumping 2.jpg (144.57 KiB) Viewed 100 times
murray slumping.jpg
Murray Slumping
murray slumping.jpg (122.13 KiB) Viewed 100 times
smithy
 

Previous

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |