Sturts 3 on report from last week

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Sturts 3 on report from last week

Postby Jimmy » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:24 pm

2 got off and 1 with a rep from db.org

:D
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:33 pm

thats crap, if hargraves gets off then surely the sturt lads would have and should have got games!!!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60931
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13430 times
Been liked: 4640 times

Re: Sturts 3 on report from last week

Postby Punk Rooster » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:35 pm

Jimmy wrote:2 got off and 1 with a rep from db.org

*
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Sturts 3 on report from last week

Postby RustyCage » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:38 pm

*


What the hell does that mean!!!
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15303
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 937 times

Postby MST » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:43 pm

What sort of punishment are the three circus clowns, I mean umpires, in line for given the time and resources wasted on a tribunal hearing??

Shane Harris was at the game and surely would have been embarrassed by the performance of the three 'men' in white. Or would he?

I am personally tired of Umpires having a bearing on the pattern of games. The amount of guessing and over-officiating that occured on Friday night was beyond laughable. I had Norwood supporters apologising to me at half-time.......

Wake up Shane. Our competition desrves better than some of the crap we're getting at the minute.
Last edited by MST on Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MST
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: The Home of Football, Unley Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

for the meaning of *

Postby Lunchcutter » Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:00 pm

see footysa.com
RIP my DH 1964 - 2009 - You were one of the best and I miss you
User avatar
Lunchcutter
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Example

Postby Lunchcutter » Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:11 pm

Jimmy Gowans was pulled off * 26 min mark of the third quarter....
:lol:
RIP my DH 1964 - 2009 - You were one of the best and I miss you
User avatar
Lunchcutter
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Postby JK » Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:39 pm

MST wrote:What sort of punishment are the three circus clowns, I mean umpires, in line for given the time and resources wasted on a tribunal hearing??

Shane Harris was at the game and surely would have been embarrassed by the performance of the three 'men' in white. Or would he?

I am personally tired of Umpires having a bearing on the pattern of games. The amount of guessing and over-officiating that occured on Friday night was beyong laughable. I had Norwood supporters apologising to me at half-time.......

Wake up Shane. Our competition desrves better than some of the crap we're getting at the minute.


Hard to disagree with that ... Most of the fellow Legs fans I was near couldn't work out what the reports were for either ... Certainly nothing obvious which used to be the case for copping a report in the SANFL ...
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: for the meaning of *

Postby RustyCage » Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:46 pm

Lunchcutter wrote:see footysa.com


See footysa.com? Hahaha, I'd rather not read that shite.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15303
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: for the meaning of *

Postby Lunchcutter » Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:55 pm

pafc1870 wrote:
Lunchcutter wrote:see footysa.com


See footysa.com? Hahaha, I'd rather not read that shite.


ah ok each to their own.. you did however ask the question.. i just gave an answer... personally I like to keep a balanced view of issues....

:roll:
RIP my DH 1964 - 2009 - You were one of the best and I miss you
User avatar
Lunchcutter
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: for the meaning of *

Postby RustyCage » Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:58 pm

Lunchcutter wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:
Lunchcutter wrote:see footysa.com


See footysa.com? Hahaha, I'd rather not read that shite.


ah ok each to their own.. you did however ask the question.. i just gave an answer... personally I like to keep a balanced view of issues....

:roll:


Wasn't saying anything against you Lunchy, just there are a couple of people there who seem to dominate every forum thread who make me angry reading their posts, so I avoid the site, but you answered my question, and cheers for that.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15303
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: for the meaning of *

Postby Lunchcutter » Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:00 pm

pafc1870 wrote:
Lunchcutter wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:
Lunchcutter wrote:see footysa.com


See footysa.com? Hahaha, I'd rather not read that shite.


ah ok each to their own.. you did however ask the question.. i just gave an answer... personally I like to keep a balanced view of issues....

:roll:


Wasn't saying anything against you Lunchy, just there are a couple of people there who seem to dominate every forum thread who make me angry reading their posts, so I avoid the site, but you answered my question, and cheers for that.


my pleasure pafc1870 :)
RIP my DH 1964 - 2009 - You were one of the best and I miss you
User avatar
Lunchcutter
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Modbury

without knowing

Postby bayman » Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:01 pm

would the umpire who made the report(s) be an afl listed umpire ? as that comp has 'different rules/interpretations' to the sanfl
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby sturt1 » Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:37 pm

I saw all 3 of them get reported but didnt see what they did wrong. :?
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Wedgie » Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:47 pm

MST wrote:What sort of punishment are the three circus clowns, I mean umpires, in line for given the time and resources wasted on a tribunal hearing??


Good point and the time of the players and clubs involved.
The Hargraves report was downright laughable.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga


Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |