by old farmer » Fri May 22, 2009 9:37 pm
by S Demon » Sat May 23, 2009 6:44 pm
by Footy Chick » Sat May 23, 2009 6:46 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Fitzroy v Greenacres
CBCOC v North Haven
Golden Grove v Unley
Adelaide Lutheran v Salis west
PAC v Pooraka - I tossed a coin, it came up heads
by Jimmy_041 » Sat May 23, 2009 7:13 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Sat May 23, 2009 7:36 pm
by Rowd072 » Sun May 24, 2009 12:34 am
by Flipper » Sun May 24, 2009 11:51 am
by amber_fluid » Sun May 24, 2009 11:56 am
Flipper wrote:Savagly sub standard umpiring. We had one umpire who was a joke! I honestly think he has something against the dolphins. We won by 30+ goals and its rare for someone after a win to carry on about the umps but this was a joke.
by Flipper » Sun May 24, 2009 12:07 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Flipper wrote:Savagly sub standard umpiring. We had one umpire who was a joke! I honestly think he has something against the dolphins. We won by 30+ goals and its rare for someone after a win to carry on about the umps but this was a joke.
Which umpire are you talking about? They were just as bad for both teams. A couple of your guys can count themselves lucky for not being reported for undisicplined acts. One was right in front of the umpire. I wouldn't be complaining about umpires.
by Dolphin Express » Sun May 24, 2009 12:09 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Flipper wrote:Savagly sub standard umpiring. We had one umpire who was a joke! I honestly think he has something against the dolphins. We won by 30+ goals and its rare for someone after a win to carry on about the umps but this was a joke.
Which umpire are you talking about? They were just as bad for both teams. A couple of your guys can count themselves lucky for not being reported for undisicplined acts. One was right in front of the umpire. I wouldn't be complaining about umpires.
by amber_fluid » Sun May 24, 2009 12:16 pm
Dolphin Express wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Flipper wrote:Savagly sub standard umpiring. We had one umpire who was a joke! I honestly think he has something against the dolphins. We won by 30+ goals and its rare for someone after a win to carry on about the umps but this was a joke.
Which umpire are you talking about? They were just as bad for both teams. A couple of your guys can count themselves lucky for not being reported for undisicplined acts. One was right in front of the umpire. I wouldn't be complaining about umpires.
Amber we have had the Dick Johnson lookalike the last two times we have played North Haven at home. He is consistently bad and I can see where Flip is coming from. In round 18 last year he took it upon himself to let NH back in the game with blatant one sided umpiring. Read into it what you will. I cant remember him umpiring us other than that, so I cant comment on his hate dislike for the dolphins.
You may be clutching at straws saying our blokes were undisciplined. Your Tina Turner lookalike ruckman was practically fly kicking our ruckmen at the centre bounces. Last time I checked that was reportable.
by Punk Rooster » Sun May 24, 2009 12:23 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Secondly, one of you blokes punched one of our U/18's Kids in the face in the last quarter right in front of the umpire. It may have only been a jumper punch but your bloke was a big bloke picking on a kid. If that's not an undiscipined act then what is?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by amber_fluid » Sun May 24, 2009 12:26 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Secondly, one of you blokes punched one of our U/18's Kids in the face in the last quarter right in front of the umpire. It may have only been a jumper punch but your bloke was a big bloke picking on a kid. If that's not an undiscipined act then what is?
it was an A grade game of football right? If he's only an "U/18's player", why's he playing A grade then?
Not condoning what allegedly happened, but not sure you can play that card....
by Flipper » Sun May 24, 2009 3:06 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Sun May 24, 2009 3:40 pm
Do what I say, not what I didn’t do
Of course, as coaches would know, it’s not easy putting experience into new heads, and he has quite a few of them at Unley. But Young will continue to persist because, amidst the disappointment, including losing the past two rounds to Prince Alfred Old Collegians by 72
when Mark Ricciuto kicked 12 goals, and last week to the unbeaten Fitzroy by 89, there have been some positive signs that the Jets are not as bad as some might believe.
by turk186 » Sun May 24, 2009 6:38 pm
by amber_fluid » Sun May 24, 2009 7:38 pm
Flipper wrote:Quote the bound ump that did report him "there was nothing in it". I did hear it was retaliation as well.
But i agree AF enough ump bashing. Empathic victory for the brothers i shouldnt be putting bad light on a game which had so many positives.
Allen 10 goals straight, Blash 6 and close to 40 poss, Ryan Bubba powerful display, Shilla rock solid in defence.
Also Shoey played in his 100th for the club great bloke and footy player. A huge personality at the club. Well done.
by aceman » Sun May 24, 2009 7:46 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:It would be good if the "official" SAAFL publication could get its facts right.
Every week there are blatant errors in the information.
Take Friday's Footy News:Do what I say, not what I didn’t do
Of course, as coaches would know, it’s not easy putting experience into new heads, and he has quite a few of them at Unley. But Young will continue to persist because, amidst the disappointment, including losing the past two rounds to Prince Alfred Old Collegians by 72
when Mark Ricciuto kicked 12 goals, and last week to the unbeaten Fitzroy by 89, there have been some positive signs that the Jets are not as bad as some might believe.
Ricciuto didn't play and he hasn't kicked 12 goals in any games. It is not difficult to check your facts when you are (i) the official publication of the SAAFL and therefore have all of their resources to use, and (ii) getting paid to do a job
A cursory glance at your own website would show you the facts. Maybe getting rid of your volunteers was not the smartest move................
by old moz » Sun May 24, 2009 9:45 pm
aceman wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:It would be good if the "official" SAAFL publication could get its facts right.
Every week there are blatant errors in the information.
Take Friday's Footy News:Do what I say, not what I didn’t do
Of course, as coaches would know, it’s not easy putting experience into new heads, and he has quite a few of them at Unley. But Young will continue to persist because, amidst the disappointment, including losing the past two rounds to Prince Alfred Old Collegians by 72
when Mark Ricciuto kicked 12 goals, and last week to the unbeaten Fitzroy by 89, there have been some positive signs that the Jets are not as bad as some might believe.
Ricciuto didn't play and he hasn't kicked 12 goals in any games. It is not difficult to check your facts when you are (i) the official publication of the SAAFL and therefore have all of their resources to use, and (ii) getting paid to do a job
A cursory glance at your own website would show you the facts. Maybe getting rid of your volunteers was not the smartest move................
Jimmy, "you took the words right out of my mouth, it must have been 'cause you didn't know what to write" I think that's how the song goes or something along those lines.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |