by S Demon » Sat May 30, 2009 6:55 pm
by Trinity Girl » Sat May 30, 2009 10:09 pm
scottroo wrote:clg over lockleys by 3 goals. both sides had plenty out,but any win is a good win at lockleys
by unknown source » Sun May 31, 2009 4:29 am
by carey » Sun May 31, 2009 3:28 pm
Trinity Girl wrote:scottroo wrote:clg over lockleys by 3 goals. both sides had plenty out,but any win is a good win at lockleys
Interesting...... SAAFL reads clg 11.13.79 - Lockleys 8.20.68. When i went to school 79 - 68 = 11. Unless the rules changed in footy over the weekend??? but doesnt 3 goals = 18 points.
Correct score doesnt really matter tho right pfft 11/18 end of the day i guess clg were just way too good for Lockleys![]()
by Trinity Girl » Sun May 31, 2009 4:44 pm
carey wrote:Trinity Girl wrote:scottroo wrote:clg over lockleys by 3 goals. both sides had plenty out,but any win is a good win at lockleys
Interesting...... SAAFL reads clg 11.13.79 - Lockleys 8.20.68. When i went to school 79 - 68 = 11. Unless the rules changed in footy over the weekend??? but doesnt 3 goals = 18 points.
Correct score doesnt really matter tho right pfft 11/18 end of the day i guess clg were just way too good for Lockleys![]()
well 2 more goals and they still would've lost 3 more and they would've won so i guess scottroo is right t/g!
by mypaddock » Sun May 31, 2009 4:52 pm
unknown source wrote:okay WC were great to start with but im going to be honest there are feral and rely on a knob head to win them the ball. i.e number 12.. he and a few others just wanted to mouth off when they were down in the last quarter.. there best player is there ruckman but when you make him ruck all day he is going to break down like he did.. and we jumped on top.. stubbie was a stand out but had no help from the watchers next to him.. W C deserve to be 3rd but thats it.. and when stubba celebrates a goal 6 goals down whats gong on?? does he play for himself or the hawks?? if he is a team player he looked like an idiot.. as for the ferals on the side line they would not know team work if it smashed them in the face, very ugly and stupid comments... as for the club man that said that he hopes we go undeafeted this year in our change room even tho we got to play west croydon again thankyou.. wake up WC !!!!!!
by gothebombers » Sun May 31, 2009 5:10 pm
didnt teach you to spell since your knit pickingTrinity Girl wrote:carey wrote:Trinity Girl wrote:scottroo wrote:clg over lockleys by 3 goals. both sides had plenty out,but any win is a good win at lockleys
Interesting...... SAAFL reads clg 11.13.79 - Lockleys 8.20.68. When i went to school 79 - 68 = 11. Unless the rules changed in footy over the weekend??? but doesnt 3 goals = 18 points.
Correct score doesnt really matter tho right pfft 11/18 end of the day i guess clg were just way too good for Lockleys![]()
well 2 more goals and they still would've lost 3 more and they would've won so i guess scottroo is right t/g!
Maybe i got taught different maths at school to the both of u??? But if Lockleys scored 2 more goals why would thay have lost?? Wouldnt that have made the score Lockleys 80 clg 79.
Sorry Carey your post makes no senceto me????
by Trinity » Sun May 31, 2009 5:12 pm
by Trinity Girl » Sun May 31, 2009 5:47 pm
gothebombers wrote:didnt teach you to spell since your knit pickingTrinity Girl wrote:carey wrote:Trinity Girl wrote:Interesting...... SAAFL reads clg 11.13.79 - Lockleys 8.20.68. When i went to school 79 - 68 = 11. Unless the rules changed in footy over the weekend??? but doesnt 3 goals = 18 points.
Correct score doesnt really matter tho right pfft 11/18 end of the day i guess clg were just way too good for Lockleys![]()
well 2 more goals and they still would've lost 3 more and they would've won so i guess scottroo is right t/g!
Maybe i got taught different maths at school to the both of u??? But if Lockleys scored 2 more goals why would they have lost?? Wouldnt that have made the score Lockleys 80 clg 79.
Sorry Carey your post makes no senseto me????
by carey » Sun May 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Trinity wrote:Great day out for the TOS boys yesterday - A's 177 point winners - B's 90 point winners - C's 115 point winners![]()
by Bluedemon » Sun May 31, 2009 6:48 pm
by axe_38 » Sun May 31, 2009 6:52 pm
by scottroo » Sun May 31, 2009 7:48 pm
by gothebombers » Sun May 31, 2009 8:09 pm
unknown source wrote:okay WC were great to start with but im going to be honest there are feral and rely on a knob head to win them the ball. i.e number 12.. he and a few others just wanted to mouth off when they were down in the last quarter.. there best player is there ruckman but when you make him ruck all day he is going to break down like he did.. and we jumped on top.. stubbie was a stand out but had no help from the watchers next to him.. W C deserve to be 3rd but thats it.. and when stubba celebrates a goal 6 goals down whats gong on?? does he play for himself or the hawks?? if he is a team player he looked like an idiot.. as for the ferals on the side line they would not know team work if it smashed them in the face, very ugly and stupid comments... as for the club man that said that he hopes we go undeafeted this year in our change room even tho we got to play west croydon again thankyou.. wake up WC !!!!!!
by Footy Chick » Sun May 31, 2009 8:36 pm
by FLYING DUTCHMAN 18 » Sun May 31, 2009 11:48 pm
by Stroker » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:09 am
unknown source wrote:okay WC were great to start with but im going to be honest there are feral and rely on a knob head to win them the ball. i.e number 12.. he and a few others just wanted to mouth off when they were down in the last quarter.. there best player is there ruckman but when you make him ruck all day he is going to break down like he did.. and we jumped on top.. stubbie was a stand out but had no help from the watchers next to him.. W C deserve to be 3rd but thats it.. and when stubba celebrates a goal 6 goals down whats gong on?? does he play for himself or the hawks?? if he is a team player he looked like an idiot.. as for the ferals on the side line they would not know team work if it smashed them in the face, very ugly and stupid comments... as for the club man that said that he hopes we go undeafeted this year in our change room even tho we got to play west croydon again thankyou.. wake up WC !!!!!!
by human blanket #3 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:59 am
by dodgingandweaving » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:58 am
kookas wrote:not a good day out for glenung, 0.4 for both teams kicked in the 1 day, they wont be beat central united next week, could be a season without a win.
by Browny25 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:09 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |