BL&G u17 and a half favourites

[Footy Boots]

the bit were freeling go wrong is they dont give the ball to the forwards they have. and they only have the 1 perminent forward the rest of the team dont no how to play around him. it is a constant rotating forward line that is hurting them big time. hopfully they find some consistantsy up there and they can learn how to use schmidt better.FB is Schmidt your lovechild or what ??

nah he is a good mate and a top bloke. could be good if he is used rite.

and the topic is about the freeling forward line and he is a part of that.

i have a biast opinion tho.

[Dizzee Rascal]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

[jakovasaurus]

the bit were freeling go wrong is they dont give the ball to the forwards they have. and they only have the 1 perminent forward the rest of the team dont no how to play around him. it is a constant rotating forward line that is hurting them big time. hopfully they find some consistantsy up there and they can learn how to use schmidt better.FB is Schmidt your lovechild or what ??

must either be the big lad himself or his mum, FB sure is quick to come to the schmidts defence

[footy head]

i think barossa playing a full strength side could take it to freeling
freelings forwardline is to short, slow and a bit on the large side thats wear they need to improve.
ote="Dizzee Rascal"]In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on![/quote]

[Footy Boots]

the bit were freeling go wrong is they dont give the ball to the forwards they have. and they only have the 1 perminent forward the rest of the team dont no how to play around him. it is a constant rotating forward line that is hurting them big time. hopfully they find some consistantsy up there and they can learn how to use schmidt better.FB is Schmidt your lovechild or what ??

must either be the big lad himself or his mum, FB sure is quick to come to the schmidts defence

so wait im not allowed to adress any problems with him anymore. even when the topic involes him?

whats rong with thinking a player is good. i do remember sum1 talking about u alot jakovasourus

[Ablett]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

[footy head]

jakovasaurous is a hero

the bit were freeling go wrong is they dont give the ball to the forwards they have. and they only have the 1 perminent forward the rest of the team dont no how to play around him. it is a constant rotating forward line that is hurting them big time. hopfully they find some consistantsy up there and they can learn how to use schmidt better.FB is Schmidt your lovechild or what ??

must either be the big lad himself or his mum, FB sure is quick to come to the schmidts defence

so wait im not allowed to adress any problems with him anymore. even when the topic involes him?

whats rong with thinking a player is good. i do remember sum1 talking about u alot jakovasourus

[Footy Boots]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

but when we beat top 4 sides like barossa south by 5-6 goal+ not good enuf. hell we even kept south goaless till the last quarter.

[Dizzee Rascal]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

Yep definitely. It's like I mentioned before, Freeling aren't putting away the sides they should put away and it's obvious when you look at their percentage.

[Dizzee Rascal]

the bit were freeling go wrong is they dont give the ball to the forwards they have. and they only have the 1 perminent forward the rest of the team dont no how to play around him. it is a constant rotating forward line that is hurting them big time. hopfully they find some consistantsy up there and they can learn how to use schmidt better.FB is Schmidt your lovechild or what ??

must either be the big lad himself or his mum, FB sure is quick to come to the schmidts defence

so wait im not allowed to adress any problems with him anymore. even when the topic involes him?

whats rong with thinking a player is good. i do remember sum1 talking about u alot jakovasourus

You just got very defensive when it was suggested that you might be the Big Schmidt himself there FB!

[Dizzee Rascal]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

but when we beat top 4 sides like barossa south by 5-6 goal+ not good enuf. hell we even kept south goaless till the last quarter.

South were at 25% strength in round 1. I could see them knocking you off FB.

[Ablett]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

but when we beat top 4 sides like barossa south by 5-6 goal+ not good enuf. hell we even kept south goaless till the last quarter.

lol well wait till you play south next time and barossa you only beat by 4 goals... if your a gwd side you don't sink down to an opponents level and if you're a top two side you should be doing a lot better than beating Willaston, Tanunda, and Ango by more than 2 goals...

[Dizzee Rascal]

In the end though I think there's daylight between Gawler Central and Freeling and then more daylight between Freeling and the rest of the comp.
The difference between GC and Freo comes down to structure and discipline IMO. GC are an extremely well drilled side whereas Freeling can sometimes look like they're in disarray with skill errors and players running forward of the ball.

FB you might as well say 'we' instead of 'they' when talking about Freeling from now on!

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

but when we beat top 4 sides like barossa south by 5-6 goal+ not good enuf. hell we even kept south goaless till the last quarter.

lol well wait till you play south next time and barossa you only beat by 4 goals... if your a gwd side you don't sink down to an opponents level and if you're a top two side you should be doing a lot better than beating Willaston, Tanunda, and Ango by more than 2 goals...

Correct. To get to GC's level you have to be destroying the bottom sides and winning comfortably over the mid table sides. Well actually GC have been obliterating the mid table sides and haven't even played Tanunda & Kapunda yet but still.

[Ablett]

oh there is definitely daylight between the top two sides... talking about Freeling's forward line, i had a look back at all past weeks and the fact is that Freeling haven't been able to kick a decent score against the lesser sides (apart from kapunda)... their biggest score has been 10 goals... and in this day and age that isn't gwd enough... not really against a top 4 (or this year a top 2 or 3) side...

but when we beat top 4 sides like barossa south by 5-6 goal+ not good enuf. hell we even kept south goaless till the last quarter.

lol well wait till you play south next time and barossa you only beat by 4 goals... if your a gwd side you don't sink down to an opponents level and if you're a top two side you should be doing a lot better than beating Willaston, Tanunda, and Ango by more than 2 goals...

Correct. To get to GC's level you have to be destroying the bottom sides and winning comfortably over the mid table sides. Well actually GC have been obliterating the mid table sides and haven't even played Tanunda & Kapunda yet but still.

my point exactly... and really when you look at the results GC have been obliterating everyone...

[Dizzee Rascal]

Quick poll. How many of you think a leading forward is more dangerous than a stationary 'bomb it long to me' forward???

I am in favour of a leading forward.

[couch coach]

oh barossa what a team cos they bet ango wat a achievement how did u go the week before against gc?

and freeling play well in the games that count like when they versed barossa

the tanunda freeling game was a ripper. dont no what people were saying when tanunda were called bad. agars back helps and ferrets run from the midfield. ninehouse rucking was good. but the leggies showing that what ever come at them there ready for. even if it takes a quarter to get started

A quarter can make a team lose a game. So Freeling better fix that.

Barrosa played a great game, Ango didn't know what hit them. I would say that the top 4 team's for the finals are the one's that are there now. But I would say Barossa could go higher.
I was wrong about Barossa winning by 5-7 goals, more like 11 goals.

Don't get me wrong I think Barossa are a better side than team's think. They are well behind Gawler Central. All team are well behind them. Gawler Central are a very well trained and have a very good midfield. Any team has to step up (a big step up) to get to their level. I am looking forward to the next time Barossa play Freeling. I would even go to putting money on the dogs. Freeling are getting a bit to big headed from what I see. I have seen them play a few games and they do not play a full game and think that 3 quaters are enough to get through. Gawler Central know you play 4 quaters that is the differents between 1st & the rest.

[Footy Boots]

bit silly saying that freeling arnt a top 2 team when they have beaten every1 beside gawler C and have been the closest to them yet. a win is a win no matter by how much. and i think u will find that our percentage is is second in the comp dizze. and we also have the 3rd higest score under barossa who belted a undermaned kapunda team by 27 goals.

[Ablett]

bit silly saying that freeling arnt a top 2 team when they have beaten every1 beside gawler C and have been the closest to them yet. a win is a win no matter by how much. and i think u will find that our percentage is is second in the comp dizze. and we also have the 3rd higest score under barossa who belted a undermaned kapunda team by 27 goals.

mate where the hell do you get your info from... and your percentage, well barossa's is only like .15% less than yours so yeah it is the 2nd highest but still... and mate you have like the 6th or 7th highest score (unless the papers and the internet have it wrong)...

[Footy Boots]

bit silly saying that freeling arnt a top 2 team when they have beaten every1 beside gawler C and have been the closest to them yet. a win is a win no matter by how much. and i think u will find that our percentage is is second in the comp dizze. and we also have the 3rd higest score under barossa who belted a undermaned kapunda team by 27 goals.

mate where the hell do you get your info from... and your percentage, well barossa's is only like .15% less than yours so yeah it is the 2nd highest but still... and mate you have like the 6th or 7th highest score (unless the papers and the internet have it wrong)...

http://football-online.com.au/league/le ... p?league=2

[Dizzee Rascal]

bit silly saying that freeling arnt a top 2 team when they have beaten every1 beside gawler C and have been the closest to them yet. a win is a win no matter by how much. and i think u will find that our percentage is is second in the comp dizze. and we also have the 3rd higest score under barossa who belted a undermaned kapunda team by 27 goals.

What I was referring to with your % FB is that when you've only had the one loss you're % should be a lot higher. It's because you don't smash the teams you should smash. For example, Tanunda! You also should have knocked Kapunda by 120+.