SAAFl Div 6 & 6R (2009)

[Browny25]

Nice one mate...

Good to see you put yourself in the team of the year aswell......

[keen observer]

pretty bored so ive decided to do a team of the year so far

FF Walton(bl) Bryant(wc) Dalby(clg)

HF J Bentley(CLG) Boothey(Para) Varnas (mp)

C Payne(BL) Sibbick (BL) Matthews (tr)

HB Holland(P) Guerin (TR) Wotton (H)

B Grgurovic(BL) L Bentley (CLG) Francisco (H)

R Vassali (WC) Corbett (L) Harvey (CLG)

Int Verbis (BL) L McDonnell (MP) Olsen(H)

Emergencys. Scrutton(CLG) Solly (BL) Scott (BL)

Wouldnt have thought grgurovic would be up there..he hasnt been in the Brahma Lodge best players once in the paper unless im mis reading them?

[Browny25]

I said this last year and i'll say it again.... the team of the year(s) are a joke!

The majority only see each team twice and then the rest is going by what is written in the budget (which are generally an extension of what the sunday mail reads) and half the time then best players in the sunday mail are 100% correct...

but whatever, it still makes interesting reading

[Lightning McQueen]

Wouldnt have thought grgurovic would be up there..he hasnt been in the Brahma Lodge best players once in the paper unless im mis reading them?

A smart coach doesn't put his "best" players in the paper.

[Groover]

Wouldnt have thought grgurovic would be up there..he hasnt been in the Brahma Lodge best players once in the paper unless im mis reading them?

A smart coach doesn't put his "best" players in the paper.

After spellcheck is used at the advertiser, Grgurovic changes to Payne for some reason

[Q.]

Wouldnt have thought grgurovic would be up there..he hasnt been in the Brahma Lodge best players once in the paper unless im mis reading them?

A smart coach doesn't put his "best" players in the paper.

[zedman]

Wouldnt have thought grgurovic would be up there..he hasnt been in the Brahma Lodge best players once in the paper unless im mis reading them?

A smart coach doesn't put his "best" players in the paper.

[Dogwatcher]

I said this last year and i'll say it again.... the team of the year(s) are a joke!

The majority only see each team twice and then the rest is going by what is written in the budget (which are generally an extension of what the sunday mail reads) and half the time then best players in the sunday mail are 100% correct...

How else are people supposed to judge it then? Not sure of the last time I saw any amateur league footy on the tv, so we can all catch more...

[Browny25]

Pretty simple, you dont have one!

No point sounding educated if your not.

[Lightning McQueen]

I said this last year and i'll say it again.... the team of the year(s) are a joke!

The majority only see each team twice and then the rest is going by what is written in the budget (which are generally an extension of what the sunday mail reads) and half the time then best players in the sunday mail are 100% correct...

How else are people supposed to judge it then? Not sure of the last time I saw any amateur league footy on the tv, so we can all catch more...

Get all of the coaches and captains to submit a possible team and the majority wins, browny's right, it's nothing short of a stab in the dark, good on them for trying though.

[Groover]

Very interesting to see there was no R.Mckee in either of the two teams posted. . Thought he'd been having a pretty good season, but after last games comments maybe coaches have left him out for diciplinary reasons

[Browny25]

I said this last year and i'll say it again.... the team of the year(s) are a joke!

The majority only see each team twice and then the rest is going by what is written in the budget (which are generally an extension of what the sunday mail reads) and half the time then best players in the sunday mail are 100% correct...

How else are people supposed to judge it then? Not sure of the last time I saw any amateur league footy on the tv, so we can all catch more...

Get all of the coaches and captains to submit a possible team and the majority wins, browny's right, it's nothing short of a stab in the dark, good on them for trying though.

You say things so much better than me!

People just like seeing their own names...

I hope i do get the water boy spot

[Q.]

My mail is the mascot for the Div 6 team will be a bear, a brown bear

[Browny25]

My mail is the mascot for the Div 6 team will be a bear, a brown bear

U couldnt help yourself!

[Groover]

I said this last year and i'll say it again.... the team of the year(s) are a joke!

The majority only see each team twice and then the rest is going by what is written in the budget (which are generally an extension of what the sunday mail reads) and half the time then best players in the sunday mail are 100% correct...

but whatever, it still makes interesting reading

I like teams of the year, I agree that they are never 100% correct as they are opinion based all the time, but its good to see who thinks what players are doing well during the year.
As a players its good to know that people from the outside looking in, or even the opposition think that your doing well enough to be listed in the best 21 for the season.

But yes usually very opinionated polls with alot of quality missing out every time.

[Lightning McQueen]

I said this last year and i'll say it again.... the team of the year(s) are a joke!

The majority only see each team twice and then the rest is going by what is written in the budget (which are generally an extension of what the sunday mail reads) and half the time then best players in the sunday mail are 100% correct...

but whatever, it still makes interesting reading

I like teams of the year, I agree that they are never 100% correct as they are opinion based all the time, but its good to see who thinks what players are doing well during the year.
As a players its good to know that people from the outside looking in, or even the opposition think that your doing well enough to be listed in the best 21 for the season.

But yes usually very opinionated polls with alot of quality missing out every time.

Coming from your league of last year it would have merit, good local paper coverage, everyone knows a fair bit about each other in them sort of leagues, when there's four new clubs in each division each year, generally you don't know a lot about your opponent until the 2nd time you play them.

[Browny25]

exactly! And Groover it is only their opinion from what they read in the paper.

[keen observer]

exactly! And Groover it is only their opinion from what they read in the paper.

So now coaches dont put ther best players in the paper..pardon my french but that is f...... bullshit.So why would Payne put his name in there just for fun.

[Footy Chick]

another 5 seconds of fame

It's also why everyone thinks S.Brown is such a good player

[morell]

For Mitchell Park its usually the team manager that puts in the best players for the paper.

It is always different though, the players that get best at the club (decided by the coach) are usually very different to the ones who get their names in the Sunday Mail.