2007 Rumours - Who is going where?

[PortAdelaideProud]

Controversial question PAP. Has there been any suggestion that this is on the cards, or have you brought it up as ity would be a good fit for both De Luca and the Port Magpies?

I've been told that the Magpies have been looking at Deluca for quite awhile. But your right, Deluca to Port would be a good fit for both parties involved. Deluca will be the leading ruckman for the greatest club in history, and will actually have a chance to develope into the ruckman that the Power will need once Lade and Brogan retire.

How would it be a good fit for Sturt?

In saying both parties, I mean Fabian Deluca and the Port Adelaide Magpies. If Fabian wants to transfer to Port Adelaide, there is nothing Sturt can do about it (as far as I'm aware).

Besides, how is Fabian supposed to develope into an AFL quality ruckman while being stuck in th Sturt reserves side?

[CENTURION]

Borlace to Centrals.

[Dogwatcher]

Had heard that.
Been talked about previously hasn't it?

[Sam_goUUUdogs]

yeah a few times, hopefully its true this time but i doubt it.

[CENTURION]

i think we made it up about 3 years ago.

[JK]

Controversial question PAP. Has there been any suggestion that this is on the cards, or have you brought it up as ity would be a good fit for both De Luca and the Port Magpies?

I've been told that the Magpies have been looking at Deluca for quite awhile. But your right, Deluca to Port would be a good fit for both parties involved. Deluca will be the leading ruckman for the greatest club in history, and will actually have a chance to develope into the ruckman that the Power will need once Lade and Brogan retire.

How would it be a good fit for Sturt?

In saying both parties, I mean Fabian Deluca and the Port Adelaide Magpies. If Fabian wants to transfer to Port Adelaide, there is nothing Sturt can do about it (as far as I'm aware).

Besides, how is Fabian supposed to develope into an AFL quality ruckman while being stuck in th Sturt reserves side?

He played League for Sturt this year when we played them, and played very well ... I can't see how Port can just take him if Sturt have met the requirements in playing him?

[PortAdelaideProud]

I don't think it's a matter of Port just taking him, I think it's Deluca wanting to go to Port.

[Dogwatcher]

of course it is.

[eaglehaslanded]

Centrals - Leaving
Scoullar - Retired
McCabe - Retired
Wilson - Carlton
Currie - ???
Graham - ???
Steinberner - ???

Centrals - Coming
Barnaby French - ???
Luke Jehrico -???

You can add to this the names of James & Chris Gowans heading back home to victoria.

[eaglehaslanded]

Other moves I've recently heard of is Vincenzo Rugolo to Port Magpies and Daniel Hargraves to Eagles.

[Wedgie]

and Daniel Hargraves to Eagles.

Crikey, that'd be the funniest one I've heard yet.
I'm sure the Ken Farmer medalist Passador would be quite happy to give Hargs the full forward spot and drop down to reserves to compete with Travis Oakley!

[Aerie]

and Daniel Hargraves to Eagles.

Crikey, that'd be the funniest one I've heard yet.
I'm sure the Ken Farmer medalist Passador would be quite happy to give Hargs the full forward spot and drop down to reserves to compete with Travis Oakley!

Passador wouldn't be worried, but our team mascot would be nervice as this is the only way I could see Hargraves fitting in at the Eagles.

[Wedgie]

I think we can safely say that that one's a furphy.

Might have had better legs a few years ago when Hargs was offered more money than what he was receiving at North to go elsewhere.

[CENTURION]

Wot about Gatto to Eastern Park? It came from someone who spends a LOT of time at that club!

[giffo]

Centrals - Leaving
Scoullar - Retired
McCabe - Retired
Wilson - Carlton
Currie - ???
Graham - ???
Steinberner - ???

Centrals - Coming
Barnaby French - ???
Luke Jehrico -???

You can add to this the names of James & Chris Gowans heading back home to victoria.

Sorrry EHl & all you others, at this stage the twins are staying.

[Spiritof64]

We're still the same club, we're just forced to have the PAMFC banner because there cannot be 2 PAFC's.

But to us Port supporters:

2 teams
1 club
1 history

1 club?

1.Port Adelaide Football Club inc. - 1 legal entity with an number of incorporation going back to 18 hundred and something. Changed it's name in November 1997 to Port Adelaide Magpies FC inc. with same number of incorporation (to allow the Power to call itself PAFC) so still same legal entity and the club with all the history.
2. Port Adelaide Football Club (AFL) Pty Ltd (with board split between PAFC inc and SANFL) created at ASIC on 29/03/97. Different legal entity. Changed it's name to Port Adelaide Football Club Pty Ltd in November 1997 to takeover the "good will" of the previous club. Still not the original club.


1 history?
The original club was sold down the river by people claiming to be Port Adelaide people to create a bastard child with the SANFL. To say "so and so" was a Port Adelaide FC Pty Ltd legend is like saying Doc Baldock is an AFL legend.
The original swampies got done like the Spartans at Thermopalae.

[eaglehaslanded]

and Daniel Hargraves to Eagles.

Crikey, that'd be the funniest one I've heard yet.
I'm sure the Ken Farmer medalist Passador would be quite happy to give Hargs the full forward spot and drop down to reserves to compete with Travis Oakley!

I know it's out there, but it's something I heard on the weekend. I don't know that it will happen but you just never know.

[eaglehaslanded]

Centrals - Leaving
Scoullar - Retired
McCabe - Retired
Wilson - Carlton
Currie - ???
Graham - ???
Steinberner - ???

Centrals - Coming
Barnaby French - ???
Luke Jehrico -???

You can add to this the names of James & Chris Gowans heading back home to victoria.

Sorrry EHl & all you others, at this stage the twins are staying.

Again just something I heard along the grapevine. Then again that's been the talk in last few off seasons.

[Booney]

We're still the same club, we're just forced to have the PAMFC banner because there cannot be 2 PAFC's.

But to us Port supporters:

2 teams
1 club
1 history

1 club?

1.Port Adelaide Football Club inc. - 1 legal entity with an number of incorporation going back to 18 hundred and something. Changed it's name in November 1997 to Port Adelaide Magpies FC inc. with same number of incorporation (to allow the Power to call itself PAFC) so still same legal entity and the club with all the history.
2. Port Adelaide Football Club (AFL) Pty Ltd (with board split between PAFC inc and SANFL) created at ASIC on 29/03/97. Different legal entity. Changed it's name to Port Adelaide Football Club Pty Ltd in November 1997 to takeover the "good will" of the previous club. Still not the original club.


1 history?
The original club was sold down the river by people claiming to be Port Adelaide people to create a bastard child with the SANFL. To say "so and so" was a Port Adelaide FC Pty Ltd legend is like saying Doc Baldock is an AFL legend.
The original swampies got done like the Spartans at Thermopalae.

Numbers,dates,"entities" and so on dont mean farg all to the people that know and love Port Adelaide.Your statistical and legal crap has little or no influence on the passion Port fans feel.You show no ability to take feelings and heritage into account.

I for one have spent much time researching the above that you have mentioned and the statements I have made above reflect the thoughts and feelings I hold.

[Wedgie]

Numbers dont mean farg all to the people that know and love Port Adelaide.

Only because they can't add up!