Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

All discussions to do with the SANFL
The Apostle
League - Best 21
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:10 pm
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by The Apostle »

EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!! :shock:

I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game. :roll:


Or Glenelg...
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by spell_check »

The Apostle AK wrote:
EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!! :shock:

I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game. :roll:


Or Glenelg...


Ditto:

Last weeks review thread between Bays and Eagles:
stampy 4
am Bays 3
dedja 2
Pottsy 1
bayman 1
Dutchy 1

This thread up to this post:
dedja 6
am Bays 3
Dutchy 1

Conclusion: You are onto something here! :lol:
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26496
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1103 times
Been thanked: 2071 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by dedja »

Spelly, you must be more bored than Mickyj with the bye this week. :lol:

C'mon, I've been trying to get this thread back on track in most of my 6 posts! :shock:

Don't forget to add one more to the total for this thread. ;)
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by spell_check »

dedja wrote:Spelly, you must be more bored than Mickyj with the bye this week. :lol:

C'mon, I've been trying to get this thread back on track in most of my 6 posts! :shock:

Don't forget to add one more to the total for this thread. ;)


Yeah, not a lot to talk about here at the moment. ;)
The Apostle
League - Best 21
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:10 pm
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by The Apostle »

spell_check wrote:
The Apostle AK wrote:
EasyE wrote:Geez, nothing motivates Sturt supporters to post more than a Centrals loss!!! :shock:

I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game. :roll:


Or Glenelg...


Ditto:

Last weeks review thread between Bays and Eagles:
stampy 4
am Bays 3
dedja 2
Pottsy 1
bayman 1
Dutchy 1

This thread up to this post:
dedja 6
am Bays 3
Dutchy 1

Conclusion: You are onto something here! :lol:


:ymapplause: :ymapplause: :ymapplause:
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 7:52 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Hawthorn
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has thanked: 248 times
Been thanked: 39 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by zipzap »

spell_check wrote:
EasyE wrote:I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game. :roll:


Only one way to find that out! :P :lol:

Last weeks review:
csbowes 7
Jimmy 6
zipzap 3
CUTTERMAN 3
bluegirl2002 2
MST 2
therisingblues 2
smithy 1
phantom57 1
purch 1
Voice 1

This thread as of this post:
purch 6
CUTTERMAN 5
blues2002 2
Cambridge Clarrie 1

Conclusion: Too early to call, IMO. ;)


Love your work Spelly :)

(And this post doesn't count by the way!)
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
bayman
Coach
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:42 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Plympton
Location: home
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by bayman »

am Bays wrote:Based on a 5 sec video looked like a late charge, I'm assuming a 50 was paid that is all it should get. Didn't look like there was any contact to the head to make it look meore serious than late forcefull contact following a mark. IMO.


yes a 50 was paid, it was late & it was crude, i'd suggest he'll get 1 at most but if it was an afl game he'd get 4....this 'incident' actually fired central up a bit & they nearly pinched it...as for norwood why has it taken until the last minor round game to show heart & character because evey time central got close norwood answered where as in the past they would have crumbled....vlatko's mark was the best contested mark i've ever seen HIM take
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by spell_check »

zipzap wrote:
spell_check wrote:
EasyE wrote:I think we've already had more comments from the Sturt faithful on this match, than made the entire thread on last weekends game. :roll:


Only one way to find that out! :P :lol:

Last weeks review:
csbowes 7
Jimmy 6
zipzap 3
CUTTERMAN 3
bluegirl2002 2
MST 2
therisingblues 2
smithy 1
phantom57 1
purch 1
Voice 1

This thread as of this post:
purch 6
CUTTERMAN 5
blues2002 2
Cambridge Clarrie 1

Conclusion: Too early to call, IMO. ;)


Love your work Spelly :)

(And this post doesn't count by the way!)


Even if it did, it's still only halfway there. Unless you think there will be more input? ;)
stampy
Coach
Posts: 9170
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:51 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 394 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by stampy »

lets just say i am shocked at this result :D :D
Go The Tiges!!!
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by sjt »

See Dedja, another reason all games should be played at the same time, JAS has locked next weeks game thread. :?
User avatar
JAS
Coach
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 7:52 pm
Team: Norwood
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by JAS »

sjt wrote:See Dedja, another reason all games should be played at the same time, JAS has locked next weeks game thread. :?


A few more hours won't kill you...now stop whining and get back on topic

Regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
User avatar
purch
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:09 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Hawthorn
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by purch »

stampy wrote:lets just say i am shocked at this result :D :D


I'm not
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
User avatar
purch
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:09 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Hawthorn
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by purch »

Did I mention I wasn't shocked by this result?

Spelly how many is that now? ;)
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
User avatar
JAS
Coach
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 7:52 pm
Team: Norwood
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by JAS »

Behave...don't make me start sending people to bed early...I can just as easily lock this one too ;)

Regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by sjt »

JAS wrote:
sjt wrote:See Dedja, another reason all games should be played at the same time, JAS has locked next weeks game thread. :?


A few more hours won't kill you...now stop whining and get back on topic

Regards
JAS


:(( Norwood won. Time for a new topic %-(
Please lock it. I dare you ;)
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:29 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 169 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by Grahaml »

Pretty ordinary standard of game today. Dogs just not quite on top of the skills early and had trouble moving the ball around with the limited spaces of the ground. Really should have gotten over the top of them in the end, but Norwood were able to make our forward 50 so congested we couldn't find anyone in a decent spot to get a shot on goal. Not terribly impressed with Norwood, they just look like they lack depth. But we do have next week to look forward to now, and we really need to focus on the fact we beat Sturt last time we played and we have some firepower to come back into the side with Havelberg, Gowans, Griffin and Slade all on the outer. When and if those guys come back they'll give us a real lift.

Thought Nason looked ok. Nice goal to make up for his overzealous downfield free which really changed the game at that stage. Definitely needs a real haircut. Looks like one of those goons from the Maxtrix!

Walker really looks like his interest level changes during the games with Norwood. He looked totally uninterested early, then went onto the ball and got caught. Seemed to fire him up a bit, but Norwood need him to fire far too much for their liking, surely. Vlatko is a decent player and Rowe isn't too bad but I can't see them getting the job done as the focal points too often. Legs need to find a forward or next season might not be any better than this one was.

Despite not playing very well and losing the only great disappointment was Hayes' report. It looked ugly even before he made contact with the Norwood player. Hard to predict what the outcome of the hearing will be, but there will be a guilty plea IMHO as it was clearly a charge. Very late, hit very hard. Real shame with our big man depth being tested that our third tall defender will (IMHO) miss the next game, perhaps two. Especially when any cover from the reserves in the form of Havelberg would have gone forward ideally and may not come up for next week. Just not the sort of discipline we are used to seeing from the Centrals' boys, especially with finals in the air.
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 7:52 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Hawthorn
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has thanked: 248 times
Been thanked: 39 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by zipzap »

Grahaml wrote: Norwood were able to make our forward 50 so congested


Wow, that's almost a compliment!
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
csbowes
League - Best 21
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Alma
Been thanked: 77 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by csbowes »

Constance_Perm wrote:Not going to be an easy game next week for either team (and I reckon should be a beauty for neutrals), but I reckon the Dogs will react to their poor form today so your boys would need to be on song.

If Sturt are on song and Centrals don't match it, Sturt will win by 10 goals.

If Central are on song and Sturt don't match it, Central will win by 5-6 goals.

Neither side is any better or more of a favourite than the other, its a 50-50 prospect and anything less than their best will see the side duly punished. Both sides should be going into the game confident IMNSHO.
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:46 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by topsywaldron »

Grahaml wrote:Pretty ordinary standard of game today.


thought it was a ripper game myself, just a shame Centrals couldn't keep pace with the seventh best team in the comp.

Good luck next week though. :-j
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
csbowes
League - Best 21
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Alma
Been thanked: 77 times
Contact:

Re: Rd 23 Norwood v Central Game Reviews

Post by csbowes »

The Apostle AK wrote:I can't believe the amount of disrespect shown to Centrals in this thread :shock: :shock: :shock:...one shocker and everyones writing them off (Sturt and Norwood don't have shockers do they?)...you would of thought after the last 10 years that ppl on here would have shown Centrals more respect [-X...

The real football starts next weekend...

...and Norwood (after being predicted by a lot of punters at the start of this season to be a top 3 contender) won't be there...

Yeah but what makes me laugh is Centrals beat Sturt by a couple of goals and all of a sudden people think Sturt are mentally weak, in trouble, have question marks over them. Central get beat by a team that has performed poorly this season and for some reason those same criticisms aren't aired. Give me a break...

FWIW I don't think this game means sh*t and the loss by Sturt last week only proved the Dogs were slightly better on the day. Turn up half arsed next week and you're going down... that's for both Sturt and Central. Neither side can afford to take the other for granted, four quarters of solid football is going to be required to win.

Everyone knows the Dogs are top notch and will need a fair effort to beat...

... but I think its only fair to acknowledge Sturt are lethal if you let them do as they please.
Last edited by csbowes on Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 225 guests