Ecky wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:hmm young Ecky logged on.. cant be long now until we get a comeback from the exec
Your phantom gradings are not correct.
hahaha i didnt expect them to be, just bored and anxoius LOL!!
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:30 pm
Ecky wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:hmm young Ecky logged on.. cant be long now until we get a comeback from the exec
Your phantom gradings are not correct.
by Ecky » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:10 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Ecky » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:32 pm
While there were a number of teams who would have preferred to have more one-day matches, the determining factors in arriving at the 7/3 mix were:-
1. There is a dedicated one-day grade to cater for those players who prefer this format.
2. The overwhelming majority wanted to play opposition teams an equal number of times,
and playing the 6/6 mix as we did last season results in playing some teams twice and
other teams three times.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:33 pm
Ecky wrote:I'm not sure why everyone seems so anxious about the gradings
Last year they were only announced on Sep 18th, and I think the year before they were only announced at the Delegates meeting on Sep 24th.They were emailed around to each club's representatives last Thursday, so I thought the details would have filtered down to most people by now
They are now listed on our website (ccca.sa.cricket.com.au) along with all the fixtures.
So let the exec bashing begin!There is no way we can please everyone!
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:40 pm
by spintwin » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:50 pm
Ecky wrote:Just some comments from me:
Rose Park are unlucky to be relegated to Div 2, but with 7 teams nominating for Div 1, the fairest solution is to promote the Div 2 premiers, and relegate the wooden spooners.
The hardest thing to decide was the split between one-day and two-day games. The reasoning for the 7-3 split, as given by our President is:While there were a number of teams who would have preferred to have more one-day matches, the determining factors in arriving at the 7/3 mix were:-
1. There is a dedicated one-day grade to cater for those players who prefer this format.
2. The overwhelming majority wanted to play opposition teams an equal number of times,
and playing the 6/6 mix as we did last season results in playing some teams twice and
other teams three times.
A 5/5 split is the only way to satisfy both requests, but that means that we only play a maximum of 15 weeks in the season, which isn't enough.
Also, with the likelihood of some weeks being rained/heated out, there is a strong possibility that we will play more than 3 one-day games anyway.
As usual, all comments are welcome and will be taken on board by the exec.
by spintwin » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:55 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Gradings i think look really good and even on paper...
Good to see Enfield back to 4 sides again this season, and also Ross Smith back in the comp.
A bit disappointed to see Wolves only playing one day games though.
And welcome and good luck to North Pines
I hope Morialta have made the correct choice nominating for div 1 after the exodus of players, i know a handfull of players from the B grade arent comfortable with moving up... time will tell..
by Ecky » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:05 pm
spintwin wrote: Maybe more teams next year will nominate for the one day comp it will weaken the comp i believe.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:20 pm
spintwin wrote:I think it is a joke that we are moving back to less one day games.Now the program means you playe some teams in one day matches but not all.I am sure this was not what most teams said on the survey. I may be wrong
by auto » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:27 pm
by auto » Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:32 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:32 am
automaticwicky wrote:Nice to see you're spreading the love phantom and not just saving it all for pidge...
by bloodybouncer » Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:18 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:automaticwicky wrote:Nice to see you're spreading the love phantom and not just saving it all for pidge...
Speaking of Pidge... heard a rumor he tried to duck a ball from BB and got bowled middle stump..![]()
![]()
Also if my mail is accurate im predicting Pidge to play more for 'Roys than prospect this season and Tommy Kennison to get the call up to the redbacks
by auto » Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:41 am
by bloodybouncer » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:06 pm
automaticwicky wrote:BB's bowling again....about time. Heard the Kennison led redbacks are to be sponsored by farmers union and pre season to include drinking 2 litres of luke warm iced coffee every day.
by bloodybouncer » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:07 pm
automaticwicky wrote:BB's bowling again....about time. Heard the Kennison led redbacks are to be sponsored by farmers union and pre season to include drinking 2 litres of luke warm iced coffee every day.
by spintwin » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:41 pm
by Goat Herder » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:38 pm
by carey » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:18 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Hey Carey, whats with the Pirates nickname???
Also are we starting matches at 12 o'clock this year?
by Ecky » Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:18 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Hey Carey, whats with the Pirates nickname???
Also are we starting matches at 12 o'clock this year?
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |