Pura Cup: NSW v SA

[Maddogmike]

REB - I think you will find SA has a good record against NSW with their National players in the team.

[Rik E Boy]

44 Shields to 11 suggests otherwise.

regards,

REB

[mal]

NSW run out by Lehmann for 163 all out 304[after being 4/278]
Bailey on a hat trick in 2nd innings.
Well they found out how to get Phil NSW out, rest is history
Great declaration by Lehmann

P.JAQUES.... 163
SUNDRIES....014
OTHERS....... 127

TOTAL...........304

SA 2nd dig 2/30 Bollinger was on a hat trick as well.
Harris 9 Borgas 0 the 2 men out
That big hitting superstar Borgas played a chanceless innings until his dismissal.

REB stop your whinging at least New South Australia was left with New south Jaques.
And dont forget Elliott, Blewett, Manou, Booney and Cullen are not playing this time.

[rod_rooster]

REB stop your whinging at least New South Australia was left with New south Jaques.
And dont forget Elliott, Blewett, Manou, Booney and Cullen are not playing this time.

Blewett didn't get picked on form so i don't think you can include him. Why is Booney not in the side?

[blink]

SA 3/44 @ lunch Day 3

Cosgrove 9*
Ferguson 10*

Dougie Bollinger 3/32

9 wickets fell in the first session for just 70 runs! NSW (Jaques) is going to have a tough time saving this match!!

[Rik E Boy]

Never whinging during the Cricket season mally. I can still appreicate a good game of cricket if the team I happen to support loses the match, which I can't seem to do in football. Possibly becuase my footy team is a basket case but NSW and Australia have achieved plenty of success over the years. Perhaps the one exception was when Botham rolled us in 1981, that was pretty hard to take because we should have done a lot better in that series.

regards,

REB

[Brad]

SA 3/44 @ lunch Day 3

Cosgrove 9*
Ferguson 10*

Dougie Bollinger 3/32

9 wickets fell in the first session for just 70 runs! NSW (Jaques) is going to have a tough time saving this match!!

Game ON!

I reckon if the Blues knock us over cheaply they will beat us.

[Brad]

SA 5/125

[blink]

Things looking shakey now boys!! Redbacks up to their usual tricks

SA 6/136 lead by 231

Bailey 5*
Deitz 13*

Redbacks need another good innings from Deitz - probably around 70 or 80 odd for a lead of 300+

[RoosterMarty]

Young Cullen Bailey - will he become an allrounder for us? He seems very capable with the bat.

SA 6/157

Deitz 23
Bailey 15

[mal]

Things looking shakey now boys!! Redbacks up to their usual tricks

SA 6/136 lead by 231

Bailey 5*
Deitz 13*

Redbacks need another good innings from Deitz - probably around 70 or 80 odd for a lead of 300+

BLINK YOU must have a crystal ball, you keep being right all the time.

6/190
deitz 43
bailey 25
after being 6/129
we now have a lead of 285
this 61 partnership is very handy
we need 300+ lead in case New South Jaques fires against us AGAIN.

[Ecky]

8/197 Deitz out for 50.

When was the last time a SA wicket-keeper scored a hundred and a 50 in the same match? Spelly?

[MightyEagles]

It's been a while.

[heater31]

gone down the shitter now lads,


8/197

Dizzy 0*
Rofe 0*


Deitz 50
Bailey 25

[mal]

8/197 Deitz out for 50.

When was the last time a SA wicket-keeper scored a hundred and a 50 in the same match? Spelly?

I DIDNT KNOW SPELLY WAS A STATE WICKETKEEPER?

8/197 is a lead of 292
Anyones game hopefully Gillespie can give Rofe and Tait some support.
REB things are looking better for the """"blueys"""[what a bowler]

Now 9/198 dizzy out for a duck

Now all out 198 the Jellybacks have collapsed last 4 out for 7 runs.
Surprise surprise Macgill cleaned up the tailenders, took 4 wkts
Jaques I mean NSW need 293 to win.
Maybe SA by a whisker but we need Taity and Adcock to bowl well.

NSW 0/13 at stumps, Adcock came on after 3 overs.

[sydney-dog]

need a good first up spell by dizzy or tait in the morning, given that Jaques scored more then half of NSW runs in the first dig, if we can get his scalp early it's game on

[mal]

need a good first up spell by dizzy or tait in the morning, given that Jaques scored more then half of NSW runs in the first dig, if we can get his scalp early it's game on

9 overs before stumps
Tait 1 over
Bailey 4 overs
Adcock 4 overs

Who bowls first tomorrow morning ?
Surely the quicks have first shot this time.

[sydney-dog]

I am no cricket captain but I would think the quicks will get first use, they will only get one chance with a new ball

today 16 wickets fell for 238 runs so lets hope that pattern continues tomorrow

[heater31]

need a good first up spell by dizzy or tait in the morning, given that Jaques scored more then half of NSW runs in the first dig, if we can get his scalp early it's game on

9 overs before stumps
Tait 1 over
Bailey 4 overs
Adcock 4 overs

Who bowls first tomorrow morning ?
Surely the quicks have first shot this time.

there is only one reason why Adcock and Bailey bowled tonight, bad light only stopped Boof using the quicks

[stampy]

tait and dizzy to open up in the morning and young cullen bailey to finish them off