


 
 
                
                 
                
                
 by carey » Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:06 pm
by carey » Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:06 pm 
 by threestars » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:38 am
by threestars » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:38 am 
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by Pag » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:56 am
by Pag » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:56 am 
 by Jimmy_041 » Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:15 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:15 pm 
 by Lazarus » Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:36 am
by Lazarus » Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:36 am 
 by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:52 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:52 pm 
Lazarus wrote:I hear PAOC may be looking a bit different this year.
 by aceman » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:31 pm
by aceman » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:31 pm 
Jimmy_041 wrote:Lazarus wrote:I hear PAOC may be looking a bit different this year.
 
   But then again, the name might say it all!
 But then again, the name might say it all! 

 
 
                
                 by Lazarus » Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:04 pm
by Lazarus » Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:04 pm 
Jimmy_041 wrote:Lazarus wrote:I hear PAOC may be looking a bit different this year.
Nor sure we're doing anything for the rest of the year Shr..
 by teaoby » Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:55 pm
by teaoby » Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:55 pm 
Lazarus wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Lazarus wrote:I hear PAOC may be looking a bit different this year.
Nor sure we're doing anything for the rest of the year Shr..
Congratulations Pedantic Prince.
Just like the financial year, the football year doesn't end in December and start in January. This year means 2010 as it says in the thread title.
How many ring ins next year?
 by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:29 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:29 pm 
Lazarus wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Lazarus wrote:I hear PAOC may be looking a bit different this year.
Nor sure we're doing anything for the rest of the year Shr..
Congratulations Pedantic Prince.
Just like the financial year, the football year doesn't end in December and start in January. This year means 2010 as it says in the thread title.
How many ring ins next year?
 by TIRED TIGER » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:13 pm
by TIRED TIGER » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:13 pm 
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:17 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:17 pm 
 by X Runna » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:10 pm
by X Runna » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:10 pm 
seeing as there were only 4 non PAC blokes in the GF team cant really chuck that title around to us, but from all accounts the club is making a massive push to get old sholars back to the club that are playing else where. we along with every other club would be stupid not to make every effort too!
and yea im sure that includes certain brothers that left at the end of last year. but again we should gain 10-15 first year lads straight from school which imo made our club this year with 5 of theses lads playing in the A's GF team and 9 playing A's during the year.
 by piccachu » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:18 pm
by piccachu » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:18 pm 
 by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:27 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:27 pm 
X Runna wrote:
seeing as there were only 4 non PAC blokes in the GF team cant really chuck that title around to us, but from all accounts the club is making a massive push to get old sholars back to the club that are playing else where. we along with every other club would be stupid not to make every effort too!
and yea im sure that includes certain brothers that left at the end of last year. but again we should gain 10-15 first year lads straight from school which imo made our club this year with 5 of theses lads playing in the A's GF team and 9 playing A's during the year.
What was that?
As a college student, learn to spell and use some kind of grammar so the average pleb can understand it
 by threestars » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:05 pm
by threestars » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:05 pm 
piccachu wrote:IMO seaton, smosh and para hills are going to be the sides to beat.
portland mitcham iggies paoc and scotch will be the danger sides.
kilburn to struggle again and cbc find it hard after coming uo
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by Lazarus » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:24 pm
by Lazarus » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:24 pm 
 by aceman » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:26 pm
by aceman » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:26 pm 
X Runna wrote:
seeing as there were only 4 non PAC blokes in the GF team cant really chuck that title around to us, but from all accounts the club is making a massive push to get old sholars back to the club that are playing else where. we along with every other club would be stupid not to make every effort too!
and yea im sure that includes certain brothers that left at the end of last year. but again we should gain 10-15 first year lads straight from school which imo made our club this year with 5 of theses lads playing in the A's GF team and 9 playing A's during the year.
What was that?
As a college student, learn to spell and use some kind of grammar so the average pleb can understand it
 Blame Jimmy, it's all his fault!
  Blame Jimmy, it's all his fault!  

 
 
                
                 by RHM  17 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:17 pm
by RHM  17 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:17 pm 
Lazarus wrote:Some crappy facilities this year in div 3. PAOC, Woody South, Seaton, SMOSH and Para Hills are amongst the worst in the SAAFL.
Hopefully PAOC have filled in the holes that made a game 45 mins late last time we played at Park 9.
 Football
 Football  Other Footy Leagues
 Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League
 Adelaide Footy League
	
	
                                                        Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |
                                                        

