by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:14 pm
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:50 pm
1 6 $16.327
5 6 $12.992
2 6 $11.614
6 7 $9.289
1 5 $6.159
1 2 $5.501
4 6 $4.825
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:06 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:08 pm
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:10 pm
3 2 4 6.51% $6.51
3 4 2 6.25% $6.25
3 2 6 5.27% $5.27
3 6 2 4.74% $4.74
3 4 6 4.56% $4.56
3 6 4 4.27% $4.27
3 2 5 3.46% $3.46
3 4 5 2.99% $2.99
2 3 4 2.86% $2.86
3 5 2 2.85% $2.85
4 3 2 2.71% $2.71
3 5 4 2.57% $2.57
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:11 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:race 11
3 looks top pick from the 6 and then the 4
ill be trying for the tri for units
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:13 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:14 pm
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:17 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:im now concerned you rated the 2
may have to look at first 4's now
bloody hell oaksy, now ive gotta invest more.......![]()
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:21 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:21 pm
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:23 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:26 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:31 pm
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:32 pm
Dutchy wrote:Working Horsham Oaks?
1 6 $10.137
6 1 $9.385
1 4 $8.214
4 1 $7.173
6 4 $6.159
4 6 $5.810
1 2 $4.366
1 5 $3.535
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:34 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it doesnt suck, its just quite a poor effort of form analyses, thats all.
mind you if i knew i could get $5 the exacta and $3.60 quinella i would have hammered that
by Oaksnaf » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:39 pm
Dutchy wrote:How do you blokes do your form?
I look at recent form, recent boxes, record at track & recent grade
With the 2 it had a solid overall record with 12 placings from 22 starts and 6 placings from 10 at the track, was down in grade from its last 2 starts and came into box 2 after drawing 866, on initial look its porm was very poor in its last 3 starts but after investigating further there were excuses
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:47 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:49 pm
Oaksnaf wrote:Dutchy wrote:How do you blokes do your form?
I look at recent form, recent boxes, record at track & recent grade
With the 2 it had a solid overall record with 12 placings from 22 starts and 6 placings from 10 at the track, was down in grade from its last 2 starts and came into box 2 after drawing 866, on initial look its porm was very poor in its last 3 starts but after investigating further there were excuses
Remember the best greyhound in the race doesn't always win.
Why?
Because it may not be the best suited greyhound in the race. You don't want a wide runner drawing box 1 as it doesn't get much chance to run off the track without getting hampered.
I try and picture the race from each dogs position and analyse them H2H based on Video analysis then Form analysis. Then key stats like career S/R. Track/Distance records. Box records and Expert Tipsters and ratings.
Each greyhound gets a comment for its video (if they have one). Then a comment for its Form. Then key stat points and then ratings/tips.
From there I can try and see which greyhounds are better suited. Which ones will lead. Which ones are strong.
It's easier to find the worst greyhound in the race than the best. So thats how I start. By doing the form backwards. Rating them from WORST TO BEST. I find it easier than BEST TO WORST.
It's a long long list. Each race is different and has different ways of being analysed. After a while you don't even realise what your doing, you just do it naturally.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |