by finn » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:51 pm
by Footy Chick » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:53 pm
finn wrote:nah, we'd just go shirts and skins
by BenchedEagle » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:32 pm
finn wrote:nah, we'd just go shirts and skins
by BenchedEagle » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:40 pm
by Mr Butterworth » Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:10 pm
by Executive Member » Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:20 pm
Mr Butterworth wrote:Surely most of the teams that were in C5 last year would be in there again?
by BenchedEagle » Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:57 pm
Executive Member wrote:Mr Butterworth wrote:Surely most of the teams that were in C5 last year would be in there again?
8 Div 5 sides have nominated a C Grade - if they all get up then most of the sides that played C5 will go down to a C6 comp if they are not a Div 5 side
by Executive Member » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:05 pm
duncs wrote:Executive Member wrote:Mr Butterworth wrote:Surely most of the teams that were in C5 last year would be in there again?
8 Div 5 sides have nominated a C Grade - if they all get up then most of the sides that played C5 will go down to a C6 comp if they are not a Div 5 side
Whats the 8th side that i havent included on poll? Havens?
by BenchedEagle » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:40 pm
Executive Member wrote:duncs wrote:Executive Member wrote:Mr Butterworth wrote:Surely most of the teams that were in C5 last year would be in there again?
8 Div 5 sides have nominated a C Grade - if they all get up then most of the sides that played C5 will go down to a C6 comp if they are not a Div 5 side
Whats the 8th side that i havent included on poll? Havens?
North Haven
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:58 pm
by Executive Member » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:59 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:PAOC
by TEX07 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:38 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm
by Pag » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:03 pm
by Executive Member » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:04 am
Footy Chick wrote:because there are enough div 5 C grade teams to make a viable competition.
ie: you'll screw up the triple header thing
by Footy Chick » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:30 am
Executive Member wrote:Footy Chick wrote:because there are enough div 5 C grade teams to make a viable competition.
ie: you'll screw up the triple header thing
you will be busy when you play The Lodge as you will probably be strapping both sides
by baggy » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:23 pm
duncs wrote:Thought id better get the 2010 thread started.
So can any clubs confirm they will enter a C grade in 2010?
Elizabeth are in, with some great older players committed to having a great year.
The clubs pretty confident on having a really strong side in C5.
Also looking for as many triple headers as possible
by Executive Member » Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:54 am
baggy wrote:duncs wrote:Thought id better get the 2010 thread started.
So can any clubs confirm they will enter a C grade in 2010?
Elizabeth are in, with some great older players committed to having a great year.
The clubs pretty confident on having a really strong side in C5.
Also looking for as many triple headers as possible
You will have to add Golden Grove ,Trinity os or Wingfield royals to C5 list you could put Golden grove in C3 & C4 being the stronger club with numbers if they get in C5 they would be favourites for the flag away.
by BenchedEagle » Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:27 pm
No we wont, they will play C grade in their corresponding division!baggy wrote:You will have to add Golden Grove ,Trinity os or Wingfield royals to C5 list you could put Golden grove in C3 & C4 being the stronger club with numbers if they get in C5 they would be favourites for the flag away.
by finn » Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:57 am
duncs wrote:No we wont, they will play C grade in their corresponding division!baggy wrote:You will have to add Golden Grove ,Trinity os or Wingfield royals to C5 list you could put Golden grove in C3 & C4 being the stronger club with numbers if they get in C5 they would be favourites for the flag away.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |