by catchisthecry » Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:13 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:18 pm
by Mr66 » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:18 pm
by locky801 » Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:09 am
Mr66 wrote:900 charged in QLD,600 in NSW,200 in Victoria in a crackdown on drunken violence this weekend.
Sheesh!![]()
![]()
I made a great decision never to drink.
by catchisthecry » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:36 am
by the big bang » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:51 pm
catchisthecry wrote:Images of the attack on Fox Sports website. Absolutely sickening.
Big round house from behind..
Could have killed him. I hope the bloke gets locked up!
by cossi11 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:01 pm
the_big_bang wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Images of the attack on Fox Sports website. Absolutely sickening.
Big round house from behind..
Could have killed him. I hope the bloke gets locked up!
got a linky for that catchi?
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:08 pm
by HH3 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:20 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Be interesting to hear the story.
Why was it being filmed? What were the circumstances as it looked like there was a bit going on before he was hit?
by Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:42 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Be interesting to hear the story.
Why was it being filmed? What were the circumstances as it looked like there was a bit going on before he was hit?
by HH3 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:44 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Be interesting to hear the story.
Why was it being filmed? What were the circumstances as it looked like there was a bit going on before he was hit?
cc tv? The entire CBD of the Switch is on Candid camera.
regards,
REB
by redden whites » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:57 pm
hackham_hawk_3 wrote:
I think the reason it was being filmed was that pendleburys friends obviously know that if there was no evidence that scott wasnt causing trouble, his name would be dragged through the mud. probably quick thinking. As soon as an argument started they started filming, just in case something happened.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:00 pm
by HH3 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:03 pm
by redden whites » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:04 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:RW - I think he was indicating the camera went on when trouble started brewing. Possibly as a deterrent, or as evidence.
Not following him around all night.
by Voice » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:24 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:26 pm
redden whites wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:RW - I think he was indicating the camera went on when trouble started brewing. Possibly as a deterrent, or as evidence.
Not following him around all night.
My mate is about to get beaten to a pulp.....I will film it for evidence sake. give us a break
by HH3 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:18 pm
redden whites wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:RW - I think he was indicating the camera went on when trouble started brewing. Possibly as a deterrent, or as evidence.
Not following him around all night.
My mate is about to get beaten to a pulp.....I will film it for evidence sake. give us a break
by the big bang » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:19 pm
cossi11 wrote:the_big_bang wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Images of the attack on Fox Sports website. Absolutely sickening.
Big round house from behind..
Could have killed him. I hope the bloke gets locked up!
got a linky for that catchi?
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/video/0 ... 57,00.html
by AFLflyer » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:34 pm
the_big_bang wrote:cossi11 wrote:the_big_bang wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Images of the attack on Fox Sports website. Absolutely sickening.
Big round house from behind..
Could have killed him. I hope the bloke gets locked up!
got a linky for that catchi?
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/video/0 ... 57,00.html
yeh, i found it, but either the clip or my computer is being retarded. is it working for everyone else?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |