automaticwicky wrote:Some of them suck. Why oh why do they travel 3 abreast on an 80k zone? Thats just asking for trouble.
if they were lance or robbie woudnt be as big a problem
cause those blokes probably rde close to 50-60km an hour?!
by Iron Fist » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:45 am
automaticwicky wrote:Some of them suck. Why oh why do they travel 3 abreast on an 80k zone? Thats just asking for trouble.
by Barto » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:29 am
by Barto » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:32 am
RoosterMarty wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:The law supports cyclists using an entire lane as road users (as I've always understood it), so I've never had a problem with them doing so.
However, my pet hate with some cyclists is that they are all very vociferous about their right to use the road in such a manner, yet when at stoplights they won't remain in position as the cars have to do, they will inside ride single file along the inside, thus taking off from the lights in pole position and making the cars have to dawdle behind them again.
That is if they stop at the lights, quite often I will see cyclists ride straight through a red light as if they think that is one particular rule they don't have to obey.
by JK » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:49 am
fish wrote:I am always amazed by how much scrutiny and negative press is heaped onto cyclists when it is clear that errant motorists are clearly the biggest and most prolific danger on the roads. On my short drive today I was tailgated twice (while doing 50 in a 50 zone), saw several cars speeding and one driver texting (or dialling) on their mobile while making a right hand turn across traffic. Surely this behaviour deserves more disdain than the odd cyclist who runs a red light only when they know the road is clear.
by westozfalcon » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:13 pm
Interceptor wrote:Bikes tend to be the 4WDs of the footpaths as well.
I often go for a run where I currently live and have often encountered cyclists who insist on making their way through in a care-free fashion, despite the walkways being quite busy with tourists/locals and a 15 km/h signed limit.
Everyone needs to keep a eye on what's going on, but there's a "couldn't give a crap" attitude by some cyclists as well.
by zipzap » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:18 pm
by The Yetti » Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:11 pm
by Psyber » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:38 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:04 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Thiele » Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:15 pm
by Psyber » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:58 am
Seems appropriate for the Lycra set - all such should be treated thus, with constant surveillance..Thiele wrote:The Cyclist that i saw today were in a bunch and had police at the front and at the back.
by Pseudo » Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:45 am
Thiele wrote:The Cyclist that i saw today were in a bunch and had police at the front and at the back.
by dedja » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:00 am
by tipper » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:08 am
by dedja » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:11 am
tipper wrote:i just find it funny that whenever this topic comes up (and i am in no way implying anything about the good posters of this site) that both "sides" of the arguement (cars and bikes) admit that there are individuals within both groups that do the wrong\stupid\dangerous thing, and yet "i always do the right thing\obey traffic signals\give cyclists room etc. no one is willing to admit that they run the red on their bike, or cut cyclists off in their car. it is obviously only the car drivers and bike riders that dont comment on the net that are doing the wrong thingis the key to good manners on the road an internet connection??
by Psyber » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:12 am
by dedja » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:16 am
Psyber wrote:But I do think ignoring red lights is more common among cyclists...
by Psyber » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:26 am
Fair point - it's even more common among pedestrians!dedja wrote:Yes it is because it's easier to do ... just like pedestrians.Psyber wrote:But I do think ignoring red lights is more common among cyclists...
by Cambridge Clarrie » Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:09 pm
Wedgie wrote:If they wear lycra and they're not pushing for the Olympics they're complete tools. Some of the people riding bikes out of necessity are the better riders and use similar road sense to what I did as a kid.
I love it when I drive to work everyday when there's a safe bicycle land built away from the road but they continue to use the road, usually taking up a whole lane and complain at any buses who go close to them trying to get around these peanuts. (Anzac Hwy onto West Tce)
As a kid and a teenager I rode a bike everywhere and I showed more respect for others and common sense than any of these lycra crad peanuts ever do, I'd ride virtually in the gutter if on a main road, if I approached a park car I'd look behind me and see what was coming and sometimes slow down to wait for traffic to go past, I'd use bicycle lanes if they were there, I'd use alternate routes to main roads if no significant delays would be incurred, I'd abide by traffic lights and whenever I rode with mates I'd ride either behind them or in front of them so motorists could share the lane with us comfortably.
by fish » Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:56 pm
dedja wrote:Psyber wrote:But I do think ignoring red lights is more common among cyclists...
Yes it is because it's easier to do ... just like pedestrians.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |